Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Roger B
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Roger B »

It would appear at first glance that Ayurveda and homeopathy are at odds. I eat cold food to balance a hot personality. [Trust me on that one.] I don't eat hot food to balance a hot personality. [You don't want to be around when I do that.]

But Ayurveda uses non-diluted non-potentized (What is the one word for the dilution and the banging?] "medicine". If food is diluted-potentized, then one wouldn't get very much to eat; Ayurveda must necessarily be allopathic. And it is certainly possible to even make at home homeopathic remedies for foods that are counter indicated by ayurveda. I am extremely sensitive to curry and other hot foods, and I could very well make a homeopathic medicine out of my wife's curry, and I will.

So, there is no basic conflict between homeopathy and Ayurveda after all.
Roger Bird


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Dilution + Banging (succession) = POTENTISATION
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger B
Sent: 09 July 2013 22:55
To: Homeopathy minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
It would appear at first glance that Ayurveda and homeopathy are at odds. I eat cold food to balance a hot personality. [Trust me on that one.] I don't eat hot food to balance a hot personality. [You don't want to be around when I do that.]

But Ayurveda uses non-diluted non-potentized (What is the one word for the dilution and the banging?] "medicine". If food is diluted-potentized, then one wouldn't get very much to eat; Ayurveda must necessarily be allopathic. And it is certainly possible to even make at home homeopathic remedies for foods that are counter indicated by ayurveda. I am extremely sensitive to curry and other hot foods, and I could very well make a homeopathic medicine out of my wife's curry, and I will.

So, there is no basic conflict between homeopathy and Ayurveda after all.
Roger Bird


Roger B
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Roger B »

Thank you. Much easier. I thought that banging part was the "potentisation".

Roger
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: finrod@finrod.co.uk
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:32:24 +0100
Subject: RE: [Minutus] Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
Dilution + Banging (succession) = POTENTISATION
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger B
Sent: 09 July 2013 22:55
To: Homeopathy minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
It would appear at first glance that Ayurveda and homeopathy are at odds. I eat cold food to balance a hot personality. [Trust me on that one.] I don't eat hot food to balance a hot personality. [You don't want to be around when I do that.]

But Ayurveda uses non-diluted non-potentized (What is the one word for the dilution and the banging?] "medicine". If food is diluted-potentized, then one wouldn't get very much to eat; Ayurveda must necessarily be allopathic. And it is certainly possible to even make at home homeopathic remedies for foods that are counter indicated by ayurveda. I am extremely sensitive to curry and other hot foods, and I could very well make a homeopathic medicine out of my wife's curry, and I will.

So, there is no basic conflict between homeopathy and Ayurveda after all.
Roger Bird


szokia
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 5:21 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by szokia »

Succussion - not Succession. Succession is when a king dies and his successor claims the throne. Succussion is a form of violent shaking - in this case, banging on a book or your palm.

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Roger B wrote:


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Sorry for the spelling error!
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of finrod@finrod.co.uk
Sent: 10 July 2013 19:32
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Minutus] Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
Dilution + Banging (succession) = POTENTISATION
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger B
Sent: 09 July 2013 22:55
To: Homeopathy minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
It would appear at first glance that Ayurveda and homeopathy are at odds. I eat cold food to balance a hot personality. [Trust me on that one.] I don't eat hot food to balance a hot personality. [You don't want to be around when I do that.]

But Ayurveda uses non-diluted non-potentized (What is the one word for the dilution and the banging?] "medicine". If food is diluted-potentized, then one wouldn't get very much to eat; Ayurveda must necessarily be allopathic. And it is certainly possible to even make at home homeopathic remedies for foods that are counter indicated by ayurveda. I am extremely sensitive to curry and other hot foods, and I could very well make a homeopathic medicine out of my wife's curry, and I will.

So, there is no basic conflict between homeopathy and Ayurveda after all.
Roger Bird


szokia
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 5:21 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by szokia »

You are forgiven! :)

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, wrote:


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

To err is human! J
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of szokia
Sent: 10 July 2013 20:12
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
You are forgiven! :)

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , > wrote:


Roger B
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Roger B »

If, however, and his successor is very unpopular with his ministers, they might succussion the successor mightily, and they might be so successful at it that the successor may be unable to ascend to the throne.

Roger
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: falconti@together.net
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 18:57:19 +0000
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Succussion - not Succession. Succession is when a king dies and his successor claims the throne. Succussion is a form of violent shaking - in this case, banging on a book or your palm.

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , Roger B wrote:


Roger Barr
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Roger Barr »

Wondering what you meant by "no basic conflict betwn homeo & Ayurveda."

Mixing treatments of any kind is always a conflict. In homeopathy it obscures the success or failure of the remedy. Could lead to someone continuing to take a remedy that isnt really working causing a proving or interfering with the action a remedy that could work.

Roger


Roger B
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy

Post by Roger B »

I see.

I didn't think about that. But, after doing the homeopathic remedy and giving an appropriate amount of time, one could and probably should go back to eating in a way that was ayurvedically indicated. The problem with that is that one's ayurvedic "profile" would have changed and it could take quite a while to figure out the new profile.

Roger
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: rrandor@canhealyourself.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:35:04 +0000
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Ayurveda vs. homeopathy
Wondering what you meant by "no basic conflict betwn homeo & Ayurveda."

Mixing treatments of any kind is always a conflict. In homeopathy it obscures the success or failure of the remedy. Could lead to someone continuing to take a remedy that isnt really working causing a proving or interfering with the action a remedy that could work.

Roger


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”