Viruses are not what they tell us: was Michael Douglas - HPV Caused My Oral Cancer AND Miasmatic Theory

[yerewan]

Thank you for clarifying this.

will : )

[Irene de Villiers]

Sheri,

The problem is that the thymus is damaged by so many different drugs and chemicals. You'd need to find an individual to autopsy who avoided not just vaccines and steroid drugs or chemotherapy drugs and several other drugs, but food supplements with magnesium stearate, exposure to butyl cellosolve (as found in common things like Windex) and other solvents, preservatives, flame retardants in our furniture and walls, and a huge number of other common chemicals which are known to damage the thymus. So where would one find an individual who did NOT get any thymus damaging exposure these days, so as to have a chance to look at a supposedly normal thymus at death?

The problem is that modern life involves a lot of chemicals, nobody has ever bothered to ensure they are not harmful before using them, and avoiding exposure even if one tries, is close to impossible.

So far the only examples I know of that have a normal thymus at death,. are cats whose entire life has been minus drugs and chemicals, and cows who are grown for food and not exposed to chemicals outdoors.

The 1907 textbook of medicine by Osler, did not think there was a shrunken thymus with age, and that was before we were quite so loaded with chemicals in life as we are now. One can't KNOW at this point what the true thymus would look like without chemicals bombarded at it throughout life, or even if the 1907 textbook is good enough to go by. They made mistakes back then as well. For example this same authority on medicine for the time, states that "allergies are a neurosis of women".

So, PROVING that a healthy thymus would not shrink, is difficult if not impossible. The few examples I know of, without chemical exposure, however DO show a full size thymus at autopsy, that being at least evidence for thymus shrinkage due to chemicals not nature.

Another clue in my view, is the rate of chronic disease since man started living in what amounts to a chemical fume cupboard. The thymus is the organ to resist chronic disease, and clearly by adulthood it is too shrunken to do so, and that's when MOST people get chronic diseases, though (another clue) the age for onset of chronic disease is getting younger and younger - as we add more thymus damaging chemicals.......

So, to turn the tables, how would one prove that it is not the chemicals we live with, that "shrink" the thymus?
Individually those chemicals are KNOWN to do thymus damage. Why would it not also be cumulative?
Medical texts (these days), both human and veterinary, state that the thymus shrinks with age, but.... is it really age that shrinks it? Or have they just assumed that in this chemical laden world, (in the same way they documented and taught that allergies are a neurosis of women in 1907)?

Namaste,
Irene

REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

[Angela McGuire]

Irene,

I was referring to where T cells mature which is in the in doctrine system. RBCs mature in the blood system.

Angie

Sent from my iPad

[Angela McGuire]

I realize that the thymus is part of the endocrine system

Sent from my iPad

[Irene de Villiers]

T-cells mature in the thymus, the T is for Thymus:-)
Your school seems to teach that the thymus is primarily endocrine, mine does not.
Does not matter as long as we know what the thymus does for a living
The rest is semantics.

Yes, and it takes about 2 weeks. I am constantly up against that limitation in my work with FIP research.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."