Hahnemannian Homoeopathy (1)

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Ardavan Shahrdar
Moderator
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2000 10:00 pm

Hahnemannian Homoeopathy (1)

Post by Ardavan Shahrdar »

Dear List,

I am going to send a series of short statements
regarding my beliefs about Hahnemannian homoeopathy.
In other words I am expressing my own definition of
'Hahnemannian homoeopathy'; different homoeopaths may
have different definitions of a single term. I am
sending these posts to learn from all your comments
and discussions and hope that these will be a good
trigger for formation of new ideas and approaching to
clear definitions of terms. Without clear definitions
discussions always end in quarrels.

The subject of the posts will be 'Hahnemannian
Homoeopathy'.

Sincerely,

Ardavan Shahrdar, MD

Visit http://www.minutus.com my website on
Hahnemannian homoeopathy.
=====
Dr Ardavan Shahrdar
www.minutus.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Ardavan Shahrdar
Moderator
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2000 10:00 pm

Re: Hahnemannian Homoeopathy (1)

Post by Ardavan Shahrdar »

'Hahnemannian homoeopathy means moving in the
scientific direction that Hahnemann stepped in and not
stopping at Hahnemann's period. He himself never
stopped.'

Sincerely,

Ardavan Shahrdar, MD

Visit http://www.minutus.com my website on
Hahnemannian homoeopathy.

=====
Dr Ardavan Shahrdar
www.minutus.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: Hahnemannian Homoeopathy (1)

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Per chance last night I was reading Margaret Tyler on Verat.

She was quite upset that Hughes had removed some sx observed by Hahnemann
and that it was not possible to gauge what damage may have been done to our
Materia Medica by such action.

What sets Hn apart is his power of observation. Has anyone improved on his
Sepia sx?

It is true that Hn never stopped experimenting.
The point about experimentation is that you know what you are doing and you
make some controlled changes to evaluate the results to achieve a perfect
state.
A cook continues to make alterations to his recipe to achieve the perfect
taste. That is a little different from a trainee chef deciding that
omelettes should be made without breaking the eggs!

There have been many points that have been tried and tested and reported by
Hn in his Organon and Chronic Diseases. My point of view is that before we
embark on finding a new road to cure our patients, let us first FULLY
understand what the master has said and done and appreciate the outcomes and
then make a decision to consider to deviate from his instructions.
(This means asking questions from those homeopaths who are more experienced
than ourselves.)

On this basis I need to ask why some teachers are reluctant to learn and
teach about the LM remedies and the patient management that these remedies
require. Why are some on a whim prepared to give multiple doses within a
short time/ (e.g tonight, tomorrow morning and tomorrow night [Same potency
or 30, 200, 1m])?

Or give the same remedy every day for a month?

Why some college even teach poly-pharmacy? (and in the process suppress the
pt's sx and make it very hard, if not impossible, to achieve a cure?

Indeed why is that VERY few homeopaths have read the Organon and the Chronic
Diseases with understanding?
(It is like someone claiming to be a Christian but never having read the
Bible or a Muslim but never having read the Quran).

So how do we fight this blatant ignorance while the ignorant thinks that he
has mastered the Art and is willing to teach it?

There is another point to be considered that the health of the population is
sliding down all the time and each generation is in a worst state of health
than the previous. We have various contaminations in our food, water and
air, there are many drugs that make us ill, there is a wide spread misuse of
antibiotics and other drugs and chemicals like aspartame and of course not
forgetting the effects of vaccination.

Some of these situations call for experimentation. e.g. Dr Smit from Holland
reports that in cases of 'never been well since vaccination' he has achieved
better cure results by giving the vaccine remedy after the vaccination (e.g.
MMR 30C remedy after MMR vaccine) rather than giving the constitutional
remedy. He then waits and follows by the constitutional remedy.
This may need to be tried by others and confirmed.

So in conclusion to the question Should we experiment?, my reply is yes we
should experiment, but this should be done by masters rather than novices
trying to make a name for themselves as one sees during various conferences
around the world.

Regards
Go forth and HEAL.
Soroush


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”