Its the totality of the _disease_ (mental, physical & emotional) symptoms that are considered for proper acute (and chronic) homeopathic treatment. You wouldnt _necessarily_ consider the miasm, birth trauma, color preferences, hand gestures or other irrelevant cr*p when doing an acute! And yet it would not necessarily be considered local treatment. Local treatment is defined by whether as a result of the treatment new symptoms develop (e.g. side-effects) as opposed to a return of old symptoms (ie. curative response).
Roger
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, tikva wrote:
Local treatments
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Local treatments
That is a new definition of the concept of "local".
As far as I understand, in the field of therapy, it means a treatment that is focused on the place, organ or system that is now presenting with symptoms, without taking into consideration the "irrelevant cr*p" you so elegantly describe...
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com
As far as I understand, in the field of therapy, it means a treatment that is focused on the place, organ or system that is now presenting with symptoms, without taking into consideration the "irrelevant cr*p" you so elegantly describe...

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Local treatments
Not new unless you consider the Organon to be new, as I read it.
Roger
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote:
Roger
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote: