Local treatments

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Roger Barr
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Local treatments

Post by Roger Barr »

On this newslist I so frequently see local treatments for so many conditions, such as dental problems for example. As we all know Hahnemann warns over and over against local treatments because they cause suppression. He only recommends light palliation where necessary.

I recently realized what I think is good evidence of the problematic nature of local treatments. Over the last couple years I have taken several 10 day residential Vipassana meditation courses (www.dhamma.org) where I lived isolated from outside influences. On many of these courses I would get dental abscesses during or shortly thereafter. One of which caused me to eventually lose a tooth.

Until recently I didnt make the correlation. I have bleeding gums and with so few distractions I was brushing my teeth compulsively, 3 times per day and continued to do so after the course ended for a time. This would cause the bleeding in the gums to reduce or be eliminated. BUT since that was a local treatment the problem moved more to the interior and I developed abscesses, is my guess. After I stopped brushing so compulsively the bleeding would resume and the abscess would resolve.

Now this is nothing that I could prove but with Hahnemann warning so vociferously against local treatments, I think it is worth considering.

I wouldn't advocate not brushing frequently but one has to pursue interior (ie homeopathic) treatment, to really effect a cure and not just suppress the problem leading to long term more serious problems. And one has to consider what type of topical/local treatment one is using - how medicinal it is (e.g. essential oils, drugs, herbs, etc.) Even allopathic docs have even found correlation between dental inflammations and heart disease.

Lets spend more time discussing homeopathy on this list and less time discussing local treatments, what say you?

Roger


Dale Moss
Posts: 1544
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Local treatments

Post by Dale Moss »

Hi, Roger
Nice to hear from you! (We took Paul's three-year course together.) Amen to what you're saying. Let's spend more time discussing homeopathy, period.
Peace,
Dale


Tanya Marquette
Posts: 5602
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by Tanya Marquette »

It is true that even with acutes, the problem may stem from something constitutional.
However, Dental pain usually requires some immediate acute as the pain can be so controlling in our lives.
I relate to the bleeding gums as I struggle with this—and for many years.
Nutrition is as, or more important than topical brushing. Vit C and Mag have an almost immediate
effect. Eating dark greens also has an immediate impact as within 1 day.
There are some people who think and claim we can rebuild our teeth with proper nutrition. This
implies to me that homeopathy could also strengthen the tooth and its supporting structures.
t
From: DALE MOSS
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 12:58 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Local treatments

Hi, Roger
Nice to hear from you! (We took Paul's three-year course together.) Amen to what you're saying. Let's spend more time discussing homeopathy, period.
Peace,
Dale


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

So why do wee need and use local, topical, symptomatic or pathological treatments?

Try to remember the last time you suffered from one of those "ailments"....how nicely and almost completely obscure and distort anything else was...how you could not really focus on any other question or concern but the actual suffering; and as practitioners we have all met those patients; they need relief before going deeper and I feel it is our duty to provide it in a safe and fast as well as effective manner.

That is only when dealing with situations like pain and discomfort, wherever they are located.

It is even more important when dealing with more serious situations like heart failure, respiratory distress and other conditions where any mistake can mean a death sentence. Many colleagues have said and will still say "well send them to the emergency room".........sorry, that is a professional cop-out when the patient is not acute and has walked in with symptoms but not (yet?) needing an ambulance. Any health professional, no matter what his/her technique is, should be able and willing to deal with those cases as long as they are not life-threatening and in need of an intensive hospital setting.

Stabilise the patient first, deal with the presenting situation, then go deeper.
Read the case histories of the masters, look how big the pathological rubrics are in Kent's repertories and tell me we should not take care of pneumonia, angina pectoris, liver insufficiency, etc,.....

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com


Roger Barr
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Local treatments

Post by Roger Barr »

Who said anything about not treating these things? Urgent, emergency (ie. severe acutes) can all be treated homeopathically. And if that fails one can find many allopathic, herbal, TCM, whatever treatments elsewhere. Lets discuss homeopathy here.

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote:


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

Who said we should NOT treat those urgent cases with homeopathy? Maybe my sentence was poorly constructed in English grammar, but my point is that the masters DID treat all those situations WITH homeopathy....but when you read their cases, the way they treated was to focus on the actual, acute, clinical situation (diarrhea, pneumonia, sore throat, etc,....) without involving more general issues, M/E, miasms, etc,....

And that is the whole focus of local, topical, symptomatic or pathological treatment.

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com


Tanya Marquette
Posts: 5602
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by Tanya Marquette »

I have come across quite a number of practitoners who don’t/won’t treat acutes.
It is not that homeopathy cannot treat them, but they present a level of pressure
that people won’t take on. That is different than the question of whether homeopathy
should/could treat acutes.
t
From: Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:19 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Local treatments

Who said we should NOT treat those urgent cases with homeopathy? Maybe my sentence was poorly constructed in English grammar, but my point is that the masters DID treat all those situations WITH homeopathy....but when you read their cases, the way they treated was to focus on the actual, acute, clinical situation (diarrhea, pneumonia, sore throat, etc,....) without involving more general issues, M/E, miasms, etc,....

And that is the whole focus of local, topical, symptomatic or pathological treatment.

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com


Gisela Ahrendt
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by Gisela Ahrendt »

Good morning
I love acutes - I am very successful with them - but I think you have to be a little brave to be able to do it and have a great memory :)
Gisela Di Carlo,Di.Vet Hom
Come to the edge and I teach you to fly!
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: tamarque@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 05:32:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Local treatments
I have come across quite a number of practitoners who don’t/won’t treat acutes.
It is not that homeopathy cannot treat them, but they present a level of pressure
that people won’t take on. That is different than the question of whether homeopathy
should/could treat acutes.
t
From: Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 8:19 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Local treatments

Who said we should NOT treat those urgent cases with homeopathy? Maybe my sentence was poorly constructed in English grammar, but my point is that the masters DID treat all those situations WITH homeopathy....but when you read their cases, the way they treated was to focus on the actual, acute, clinical situation (diarrhea, pneumonia, sore throat, etc,....) without involving more general issues, M/E, miasms, etc,....

And that is the whole focus of local, topical, symptomatic or pathological treatment.

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com


tikva
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:00 pm

Re: Local treatments

Post by tikva »

TOTALITY people. TOTALITY of symptoms.

Tikva Sasson


Roger Barr
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:00 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Local treatments

Post by Roger Barr »

Its the totality of the _disease_ (mental, physical & emotional) symptoms that are considered for proper acute (and chronic) homeopathic treatment. You wouldnt _necessarily_ consider the miasm, birth trauma, color preferences, hand gestures or other irrelevant cr*p when doing an acute! And yet it would not necessarily be considered local treatment. Local treatment is defined by whether as a result of the treatment new symptoms develop (e.g. side-effects) as opposed to a return of old symptoms (ie. curative response).

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, tikva wrote:


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”