Hahnemann is a natural diamond was Subject: Homeopathic Immunisation: interviews with Dr Isaac Golden

[healthinfo6]

Dr. Joe,
In a previous response to my mention of following Hahnemann's Advanced Methods and using his miasmatic theory to prescribe nosodes, as intercurrents with antipsoric remedies, in long term treatment of inherited chronic diseases as Hahnemann wrote in Chronic Diseases, you wrote:
If homeopaths do not know when to use nososdes or "constitutions" or "miasms" in proper individual sequence, that is their own personal limitation and has nothing to do with the practice of following the needs of each patient, not following blind protocols.
There, and elsewhere, you basically are saying you don't follow Hahnemann's Advanced Methods, viewing them as a protocol, if I read you correctly. I don''t consider what Hahnneman wrote a protocol but a method where you have to determine when to give the various nosodes and antipsorics.
Yet, you find the HP protocol important and consider it Real science versus dogma. Guess where I sit!
Dogma is a belief that can't be doubted.
I have no doubt that Hahnemann is correct as I've been experiencing most of what he has written about, both positive and negative.
Thus Hahnemann IS dogma!
Currently I've progressed to Tub-K LM6 after a couple of weeks on LM18 of my antipsoric constitutional.
Possibly because one of my current inherited diseases, diabetes, has become most active and worsening, not surprising given my age, mid 50's, I'm finding I can't get enough Tub or aggravate yet. From 1-3 teaspoons per day, each 1/2, 1 teaspoon feels good, alleviating something of diabetes, keeping bipolar in check among other improvements. Like a sponge, I'm absorbing it and will try taking even more often. This is what I need now. This is what comes from following Hahnemann's dogma not a protocol.
Nosodes feel like a time machine, taking you back in steps before miasmatic disease progression began.
Yes, I know Hahnemann's Advanced Methods can be boring for those who have become accustomed to expect fast results where homeopathy can bring quick cures and relief. For example, a fibromyalgia case on your website. Considered a chronic disease, once you figured out that your patient's rape was the cause, you treated and the fibromyalgia disappeared. Thus, an example of a cause and effect chronic disease, not a genetically inherited miasmatic one. At times, I too become impatient thinking gee, there HAS to be another remedy all my 10+ homeopaths may have missed that will cure me NOW! While there are a couple of antipsorics that I will try, basically as intercurrents to the current one and nosode as that's part of the method, the vital force needs a break, a change in treating true chronic disease just as a gym workout needs to be varied for muscles to get larger and stronger, they need a recovery period before continuing on.
Hahnemann and his Advanced Methods can be compared to diamonds. A natural pure diamond is pure carbon, one element, formed under high pressure and temperature over very long time periods, possibly billions of years. Synthetic diamonds are made in a lab in 4 days mostly in Florida. A similimum is like a diamond, one remedy. A diamond may have some impurities and finding a similimum may necessitate using other remedies to get there. A natural diamond is highly desired and valued. Synthetic diamonds are not but avoid some of the moral issues and controversy of how natural diamonds are mined in places like Africa and Liberia. Hahnemann was and still is controversial as is how his "dogma" is interpreted and practiced. Even the most classical of homeopaths can vary practice through their interpretation. Thus, homeopathy can also be likened to religious dogma as it evokes a fervor and zealousness to those who have experienced any part of its glory and instills a faith in it that constant study will lead to even better results and miracles. Similar to a religious person who becomes more spiritual and enlightened through a lengthy process of study, meditation and reflection.
We should strive to become natural pure diamond classical homeopaths vs. synthetic ones looking to fast track quick, at times, questionable cures in order to appease allopaths, scientists, a rushed society and our own impatience.
Hahnemann became a natural diamond during his lifetime by spending the time and enduring the harsh heat and pressure from outside forces he was exposed to. He didn't shrink, wither and wane from controversy or throw in the towel from his own missteps but continued his own evolution and hardening through experimentation, reflection, observation, discovery. He wasn't a synthetic diamond perfectly formed quickly in his early years but polished out the flaws over time to become a 6 star diamond by the time he wrote Organon 6tth edition.
Excellent optical and mechanical properties, notably unparalleled hardness and durability, make diamond the most popular gemstone.
This is why Hahnemann and classical homeopathy need to be highly valued and treasured, created like a natural diamond they share its most desired unique properties.
Hopefully I will experience a natural diamond cure one day by keeping up the remedy pressure over time vs. just another ordinary synthetic diamond made through time saving techniques and protocols. Even if I don't, I have faith that I have chosen the right path and chose the correct dogma to follow.
Susan

[Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD]

HP is NOT a blind protocol, it is adapted to the perceived needs and desires of the patient and parents, but it APPEARS as if it was because it is limited to a few pathologies and a few remedies.

Isaac himself recommended to modify his method and not to follow it strictly (protocol) simply because the way he designed it was as a "carbon copy" of the official vaccination schedule in Australia, so that the 2 methods could be compared.

My only protocol and dogma is to have none.

And...every diamond is different, physically and optically, that is how they can be identified by good gemologists.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com

[healthinfo6]

Dr. Joe,
You are a "diamond in the rough"!
Susan

[Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD]

Thanks!
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com