Killing the Goose - interesting article on homoeopathy today

[Vera Resnick]

I really recommend reading the following article on the state of homoeopathy today.

http://www.homoeopathyinfo.com/?p=1781

Vera
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick IHM DHom Med (Lic)
Homoeopath
054-4640736
e-mail: vera.homeopath@gmail.com

[Christine Wyndham-Thomas]

That's a fantastic article and who can argue with it. It's so true. Too many people want things easy, and homoeopathy is definitely not that.
Christine Wyndham-Thomas
www.homoeopathyclassical.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vera Resnick >
Date: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Killing the Goose - interesting article on homoeopathy today
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
I really recommend reading the following article on the state of homoeopathy today.

http://www.homoeopathyinfo.com/?p=1781

Vera
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick IHM DHom Med (Lic)
Homoeopath
054-4640736
e-mail: vera.homeopath@gmail.com

[Tanya Marquette]

Okay, just read the article and was not in agreement with the author.
I have studied a number of methodologies, including my original training
in Hahnemannian homeopathy; ie, classical. What I gained out of my trainings
as a whole is that everyone brings their own personality into the case taking
process. We all have our own ways of making sense of information with some
people trying to project their’s out into the profession in some formalized way.
Further, some people relate more on an energetic level to the world around them
while others relate on a more concrete level. The author seems to be one of the
latter types. What he seems to miss is that everyone of the people who he
criticizes uses classical provings to validate their remedy choice. What I see
them doing that is different is how they organize the data from the patient.
Even Hahnemann had to apply subjective interpretation as to what were the
primary symptoms or the core of the case. Healing is always more art than
science and requires levels of understandings that guide us to making choices
in reportizing of the case. Many people today seem interested in Sankaran’s
Sensation Method and the reason is the very same reason why the author of
this article liked going back to a early Hahnemann case taking methods: how
the patient’s information is organized to lead one to a remedy selection.
Sankaran has devised a method of interpreting/organizing the patient data
so that chosing a remedy seems more formalized with better results. Yes,
there are other aspects of Sankaran’s method which seem too different from
Hahnemann but the end result is always going back to the MM and checking
on the remedy provings to ensure they fit the case.
If the author has found a method of relating to the patient within the context
of his style of relating to the world, then he has been able to improve his success
as a practitioner. What he has not done, is learn that we, as practitioners, have
our individual differences that all affect how we receive the case and organize
the data of the patient.
What I can agree on with him, is that the training of people in case taking is not
adequate enough leaving practitioners or students groping a somewhat. And this
is true for every method of case taking that I have seen.
tanya
From: Vera Resnick
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:27 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Killing the Goose - interesting article on homoeopathy today

I really recommend reading the following article on the state of homoeopathy today.

http://www.homoeopathyinfo.com/?p=1781

Vera
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick IHM DHom Med (Lic)
Homoeopath
054-4640736
e-mail: vera.homeopath@gmail.com

[R]

Great article. Every homeopath should read and consider it.

I see a place for speculative methods and little known remedies, but only after everything conventional has failed. There are still uncharted waters, but today we are jumping into them before exhausting what's known; many homeopaths dont know what's known!

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Vera Resnick wrote: