AIDS, was (SMON) Something else thought to be contagious - found to be poisoning

[healthinfo6]

Sheri,
Maybe because I live in NYC, I personally know, know of and can verify many people who are HIV+, some went onto AIDS because they did not take HIV drugs, some of those have already died, others are taking drugs and are doing well. Most I know got HIV+ from UNprotected vaginal or anal sex with someone who was HIV+ who either did not disclose their status OR they had UNprotected sex regardless.
In 1995 a friend from college died from AIDS, before there were HIV drugs or Duesberg hypotheses, had contracted pneumonia, an AIDS related condition, the year before which is how they found out they were HIV+ and already lost enough T-cells to develop pneumonia. A slow death eventually with dementia, another AIDS related condition. Other than being gay and working as an engineer for IBM, does not fit what you are describing.
If the HIV drug cocktail was available in 1995, this person may still be alive.
Another friend was diagnosed as HIV+ maybe 6 years ago. At the time their T cells were normal and decided not to take any drugs against MD advice. Well, ended up in hospital with Karposi's Sarcoma, an AIDS related condition, a cancer, on legs along with lowered T cells around 75. Now recovered, on HIV drugs, still has leg issues, scarred and enlarged, and there are also issues with active, inactive KS, etc. T cells took 2+ years to get back to low normal level. This person isn't a drug addict but a lawyer and professor. If they had taken HIV drugs initially, they could have avoided this.

So while you may want to believe Duesberg, Roberts, Null, scientific facts and actual user experience shows otherwise.
There are also all the people who died before there were HIV drugs, from AIDS complications. One was my high school english professor. You don't see this much anymore because the HIV drugs have made it a "manageable chronic" condition vs. death sentence.
The "koolaid" article I posted in last message accurately describes what happens when you become HIV infected and also explains why many can go for years undetectable and have no AIDS symptoms. Depends basically on how long your immune system can keep up with the HIV virus replicating. It also describes T-cells/CD-4 cells which levels represents your immune system status. You develop AIDS related conditions when they drop to a low level. It takes a long time to raise the levels once they've dropped. This goes back to your genetics and how strong an immune system you have, which is where homeopathy can help if used correctly, at minimum on a constitutional level.
It would be unethical, if not criminal, to tell someone with a positive HIV infection to ignore that status and not monitor their T cell levels which is what the theories you are promoting are saying to do. Once the T cells drop low enough, the conditions begin and it takes alot of work and time to get them back up along with whatever illness might occur when this happens. There are well established levels when HIV drugs need to begin to avoid complications.
Do we have homeopathic remedies that increase T cells fast enough to avoid death?
This is not koolaid, voodoo or quack science but reality, which so far is evading your fantasy.
Susan