Miasms was LM dinamisations

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Miasms was LM dinamisations

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

What is sad is that MOST homeopaths have an incorrect understanding of the true meaning of miasms.
I would encourage all colleagues to read Dr Shahrdar's writing on Miasms.

http://www.repertoriumvirosum.com/about.htm
Unfortunately http://www.minutus.org is not functioning. When it is, it will be well worth reading the 11 article appearing.
Rgds

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of geo
Sent: 12 April 2012 15:46
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re LM dinamisations
Yes, Shannon. Now that I am re-studying miasms I must admit that I was ignorant on the subject.

Thanks for reminding me.

Here is a link to an abreviated “take” upon the matter. As an intro it should be usefull
http://chestofbooks.com/health/homeopat ... eases.html

-geo-
From: geo

Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:42 AM

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re LM dinamisations
Hi Shannon. Now that you ask - I want to avoid being a hypocrite (towards myself) – and say that in

fact I studied this aspect quite a long time ago and am assuming to know. Maybe I should go over it again.

Could you recapitulate why a deep and serious assessment of the TOTALITY of the symptoms, including

the period of time and modality involved in each symptom, would not automatically “detect” miasmas?

I mean, as symptoms that are there for a long time should, out of good sense, be regarded as chronic

and dealt with with the corresponding chronic orientated procedures..... well...would not such attitude

deal with the so-called miasmas also?

-geo-
From: Shannon Nelson

Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:21 AM

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re LM dinamisations
Are you familiar with the process through which Hahnemann came to his theory of miasms, and also with what is the difference between "miasmatic" prescribing and "regular"?
I think if there is a serius suspition of miasma each one should be dealt with separately.

That..... if you really feel it is important to be concerned with miasmas.

In fact, choosing the apropriate remedy according to the totality of the symptoms should deal with

the miasmas also.

-geo-
From: Shannon Nelson

Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:24 AM

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re LM dinamisations
Interesting observations, Susan--thanks for sharing.

I'm curious about the combination of anti-psoric main rx plus anti-sycotic (or per Will Taylor, anti-tubercular) nosode. Do you have comments or thoughts about the mismatch in miasm? Just curious!
Shannon
The LM and 200C potency coexist. I tried switching to an LM Medh instead of LM antipsoric which I was going to do for a period of time but&nb sp;the LM Medh immediately cancelled the LM antispsoric action and I began to decline quickly. Resuming the LM antispsoric daily then repeating the Medh 200C in liquid is now working ve ry well
________________________________

avast! Antivirus : Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 120412-0, 12/04/2012
Tested on: 12/04/2012 07:38:36
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2012 AVAST Software.
________________________________

avast! Antivirus : Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 120412-0, 12/04/2012
Tested on: 12/04/2012 10:21:30
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2012 AVAST Software.
________________________________

avast! Antivirus : Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 120412-0, 12/04/2012
Tested on: 12/04/2012 10:45:32
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2012 AVAST Software.


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”