Explaining Homeopathy

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Explaining Homeopathy

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Greetings!
I always tell them the story of how Hn was translating an article about the powers of Chin extract of and went on to find out what happens when one take the bark extract to Peruvians took when they were suffering from Malaria!
Simples! Etch.
Rgds

Soroush
________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vera Resnick
Sent: 19 October 2011 14:29
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Mintus
In terms of explaining homoeopathy to children, I find it much easier to explain to non-homoeopaths, regular people who just follow the logic of Hahnemann's findings and ask very relevant questions. As soon as people have been through some training, they are prejudiced with use of certain words and expressions which cloud the issue, quoting teachers rather than just clear-headedly following the logic.
The law of similars works in an "if-you-do-this-you-get-that" kind of way. This is the basis - polypharmacy doesn't harness the law of similars, therefore lacks certainty. And yet I just watched two clips showing busy active homoeopaths explaining homoeopathy without mentioning the law of similars once. It's not a religious law - it's a practical basis for the medical therapeutic. If this becomes irrelevant then the whole basis and raison-d'etre of homoeopathy is undermined - and this is what has happened.
Vera
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick IHM DHom Med (Lic)
Homoeopath
054-4640736
e-mail: vera.homeopath@gmail.com
Jeff, if you've read anything accurate (try Hahnemann) about what homoeopathy is and have comprehended it, you'll know that what some have (misguidedly, in my opinion) termed "classical homoeopathy" refers simply to homoeopathy anyway. All the styles arrogating to themselves descriptions as "non-classical" styles of homoepathy ineluctably turn out to be styles of allopathy dressed in homoeopathic clothing. They're usually some brand of polypharmacy (which, as you know, is inherently allopathic, since it is impossible to practise upon a homoeopathic basis, having no possible basis in pathogenetic trials).
Homoeopathy's basis in a knowledge of primary effects is not that hard to understand. I've explained it to children who got it immediately. In the task of distinguishing the number one (as in a single, simple medicine) from higher numbers, dedicated polypharmacists have more trouble than does any three-year-old I've ever met.
Cheers --
John
ATTENTION PLEASE:

The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
Where may I ask, does the above notice say that Mintus is for 'classical' homeopathy?

And what is 'Classical' homeopathy?
Jeff
--

"Today, Georgia didn't just kill Troy Davis, they killed the faith and confidence that many Georgians, Americans and Troy Davis supporters worldwide used to have in our criminal justice system."
—Laura Moye, Director, Death Penalty Abolition Campaign, Amnesty International U.S.A.
size=1 width="100%" noshade color="#a0a0a0" align=center>

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 2092/3984 - Release Date: 10/30/11


John Harvey
Posts: 1331
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: Explaining Homeopathy

Post by John Harvey »

Yes, I find the historical approach the most straightforward too. It's easier, I think, for most people to relate to a narrative of why Hahnemann did the research he did and what arose from it over time than to relate to a collection of findings in isolation.

Cheers!

John
--
Investigation, not presumption, is the cornerstone of science. So investigate!


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”