Those who are contemplating moving to Facebook be aware that you will encounter very
radical views. For example C. Nambiar says:
LifeForce Homeopathy 9:36am Oct 22
If we understand that homeopathy is a science and not religion; we will have more matured view-point about Hahnemann. No stream of science worships the founder to limit the growth of that stream. Modern medicine has grown beyond Hippocrates, for instance; and many more examples.
All homeopaths are 'followers' of Hahnemann. Should we follow his 'mistakes' and 'limitations' also, to be 'true hahnemannians'? Or, should we believe that "our master is the greatest scientist of all times, and he is beyond all mistakes and limitations"?
Read my writings - http://www.smashwords.com/books/search? ... eff+Tikari
web site - http://www.jeffspage.com
FaceBook for Homeopathy
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: FaceBook for Homeopathy
Hahnmeann was not without errors and of course had a limited resources.
Had he been alive today I always wonder what other discoveries he would have made.
However, the results of his careful experiments are there for us to see. If you think that there were flaws in his experiments, by all means repeat them.
Why not reprove Ars and see if you can add to his list of symptoms.
Hn did make errors based on his limited scientific knowledge.
To find out the details of these, please read Dr Shahrdar's essays on
http://www.minutus.org/library/article_ ... n+Shahrdar
We will have a good discussion about PSORA when we get to it in our discussion of Organon.
But when it comes to the basis of 'symptom similarity' or the use of single remedy, then he was ABSOLUTELY spot-on.
Regards
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jtikari
Sent: 23 October 2011 03:23
To: Mintus Group
Subject: [Minutus] FaceBook for Homeopathy
Those who are contemplating moving to Facebook be aware that you will encounter very
radical views. For example C. Nambiar says:
LifeForce Homeopathy
9:36am Oct 22
If we understand that homeopathy is a science and not religion; we will have more matured view-point about Hahnemann. No stream of science worships the founder to limit the growth of that stream. Modern medicine has grown beyond Hippocrates, for instance; and many more examples.
All homeopaths are 'followers' of Hahnemann. Should we follow his 'mistakes' and 'limitations' also, to be 'true hahnemannians'? Or, should we believe that "our master is the greatest scientist of all times, and he is beyond all mistakes and limitations"?
Read my writings - http://www.smashwords.com/books/search? ... eff+Tikari
web site - http://www.jeffspage.com
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1831 / Virus Database: 2092/4568 - Release Date: 10/22/11
Had he been alive today I always wonder what other discoveries he would have made.
However, the results of his careful experiments are there for us to see. If you think that there were flaws in his experiments, by all means repeat them.
Why not reprove Ars and see if you can add to his list of symptoms.
Hn did make errors based on his limited scientific knowledge.
To find out the details of these, please read Dr Shahrdar's essays on
http://www.minutus.org/library/article_ ... n+Shahrdar
We will have a good discussion about PSORA when we get to it in our discussion of Organon.
But when it comes to the basis of 'symptom similarity' or the use of single remedy, then he was ABSOLUTELY spot-on.
Regards
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jtikari
Sent: 23 October 2011 03:23
To: Mintus Group
Subject: [Minutus] FaceBook for Homeopathy
Those who are contemplating moving to Facebook be aware that you will encounter very
radical views. For example C. Nambiar says:
LifeForce Homeopathy
9:36am Oct 22
If we understand that homeopathy is a science and not religion; we will have more matured view-point about Hahnemann. No stream of science worships the founder to limit the growth of that stream. Modern medicine has grown beyond Hippocrates, for instance; and many more examples.
All homeopaths are 'followers' of Hahnemann. Should we follow his 'mistakes' and 'limitations' also, to be 'true hahnemannians'? Or, should we believe that "our master is the greatest scientist of all times, and he is beyond all mistakes and limitations"?
Read my writings - http://www.smashwords.com/books/search? ... eff+Tikari
web site - http://www.jeffspage.com
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1831 / Virus Database: 2092/4568 - Release Date: 10/22/11
Re: FaceBook for Homeopathy
There are radical views shown all the time when it comes to Hahnemann and Homeopathy, but you have to look behind the view that is being expressed to perceive the reasons for it. If we look at one subject: the use of LM potencies, we know that these were used effectively by Hahnemann, and are being used effectively today by many homeopaths around the world, and yet I have seen across the years posts by people saying that Hahnemann didn't know what he was doing at that stage in his life, that LM's are unusable and that new potencies are needed. Also views expressed that LM's are just not needed as C's are adequate and that there is no point in using them. Why would people express these views when they plainly are useable and can be more effective in managing chronic disease than the C potencies? There can be multiple reasons:
Laziness in not wanting to put in the effort to understand the use of a different range of potencies.
Ego that stops one from acknowledging that they are failing to understand the correct application of this potency range, and stops one from asking advice from colleagues.
An inability to understand, but a fear of asking due to not wanting to appear less able than those around them.
Always look beyond the radical view and ask what others within homeopathy are achieving with the tools at hand. A wise man asks for help from those with more experience and acknowledges his own limitations.
Kerry
LifeForce Homeopathy 9:36am Oct 22
If we understand that homeopathy is a science and not religion; we will have more matured view-point about Hahnemann. No stream of science worships the founder to limit the growth of that stream. Modern medicine has grown beyond Hippocrates, for instance; and many more examples.
Laziness in not wanting to put in the effort to understand the use of a different range of potencies.
Ego that stops one from acknowledging that they are failing to understand the correct application of this potency range, and stops one from asking advice from colleagues.
An inability to understand, but a fear of asking due to not wanting to appear less able than those around them.
Always look beyond the radical view and ask what others within homeopathy are achieving with the tools at hand. A wise man asks for help from those with more experience and acknowledges his own limitations.
Kerry
LifeForce Homeopathy 9:36am Oct 22
If we understand that homeopathy is a science and not religion; we will have more matured view-point about Hahnemann. No stream of science worships the founder to limit the growth of that stream. Modern medicine has grown beyond Hippocrates, for instance; and many more examples.