Miasm - was standard of cure

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Miasm - was standard of cure

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Dear Hart
Please read Hn's writings on the meaning of miasm and then report back. For this exercise, please ignore all other 'definitions' of miasm.
Best regards

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hart Matthews
Sent: 13 July 2011 13:47
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] standard of cure
Hi all,

I, too, would like to applaud Didi for her thorough casetaking and resourceful prescribing (as well as for her organization's work). But when I finished reading her post, I was also surprised at the use of the terms "cure" and "miasm" in the subject line.

Leaving aside entirely the idea of a pertussis miasm (as opposed to a disease layer), I agree with John that it would be good to apply a rigorous standard of cure when publishing our cases..

So, what do the people on this list think is a reasonable amount of time without relapse to claim a cured case? At a recent talk in the U.S., Massimo Mangialavori proposed a disease-free period of 4-5 years.

For an infant, perhaps a shorter time would be reasonable?

Regards,
Hart Matthews
Durham, North Carolina


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”