malignant tumer in brain

[gbhaskaram]

Female 55 years

sudden shivering right side. since 2 months she was facing problem to write.

tested MRI SCAN was one and found a tumor and removed by neurosurgeon. sent for biopsy. found a scar in lungs and liver too. confirmed malignancy in brain lungs and liver.
this happened on march 17th. Doctors declared that she may not survive more than 2 months and if chemo and radiation were administered it may prolong upto 6 months.

contacted D P BENERRJEES TELE MEDECINE CENTER AND STARTED USING HOME TREATMENT AND 75 DAYS PASSED SINCE SHE STARTED.
They gave thuja 200 and conium 200 part from some other medicines.

SHE IMPROVED FO THE FIRST MONTH AND THEN GOT FITS INITIALLY WITH 20 DAYS INTERVAL AND NOW IT IS A BIT FREQUENTLY.

SHE WAS TAKEN FOR MRI SCAN AND WAS TOLD THAT THERE WAS GROWTH IN BRAIN AND MAY NO SURVIVE FOR MANY DAYS.

Now can anyone suggest the rigt medicines for her.
Suppose CARCINOOCIN IS ADMINSTERED DOES IT CONTAIN THE GROWTH. IF SO WHAT IS THE POTENCY AND FREQUENCY OF THE MEICINE.

WITH CARCINOCIN WOULD YOU SUGGEST ANY ANTI MALIGNANT MEDICINES.

PLEASE HELP.

[Elham Mohajer]

Dear ghaskaran,
Just because someone has cancer it does not mean Carcinocin is indicated. Each remedy has a key or rather a group of symptoms that you ill find repeated in patient after patient. If the key is not there the medicine is not indicated. In a case of Carcinocin the patient should be extremely orderly an fastidious, sensitive and offended easily. Artistic and music loving. They may have fear of high places. They have strong cravings specially for chocolate. But they also like sweets, salt, and cold drinks.
If you find these symptoms in the patient you are justified to givr Carcinocin.
In cancer cases the method of giving medicine is also important. One way is to start with 30 and keep going higher by one potency every time improvement stops. Another methos which I have found useful in some cases is giving 30 potency and dissolving it in one spoon of water the first day, then two spoons of water the second day so on and so forth. Till there is a perceptible improvement after which you can increase the gap.
Best regards
Elham

[Tanya Marquette]

look at ramakrishanan's protocol.
and look at her diet--try the Budwig diet, based on cottage cheese and
flax oil. you can find info online. diet is very restrictive of all chemicals
and dyes, etc. mainly raw, organic vegetables and the cottage cheese.
this woman is in bad shape and extreme measures need to be followed.
tanya

[comdyne2002]

Try a magnetic brain box. Strong north pole (south seeking surface) has been successfully utilized in eradicating brain tumors (others as well).

The magnetic energy displaces hydrogen and attracts oxygen which is detrimental to anaerobic activity which includes the yeast/fungal forms of all cancers. Cancer is a metabolic environmentally stimulated disorder. It has nothing to do with the DNA/RNA make up of cells, genes or any other such nonsense. It is the body fluid pH that determines which diseases, including cancer, will grow.

http://www.alternativehealth.co.nz/cancer/magnetic.htm

It is interesting to note that when I was associated with an alternative clinic, a patient with prostate cancer purchased one of our super magnets which he would sit upon sporadically as it caused some occasional discomfort. Over time his examinations indicated that the tumor was shrinking. He called one day in a panic and insisted that we overnight him another magnet. When we inquired as to his reason he stated that he was bleeding severely having attempted to dislodge from beneath his cat and had given up his attack now realizing that the cat wasn't about to give it up. He called us back awhile later and cancelled his order after shooting the cat. Carmi Hazen

[John Harvey]

Dear Bhaskaram,
Concerning what homoeopathy is, there are many peculiar ideas floating around. I have read on this very list, for instance, and in a context suggestion relevance to homoeopathy, the assertion that a diagnosis of cancer is sufficient reason to prescribe urine from a black cow, as it "is useful to rectify" it.
But the basis of homoeopathy is not medicinal recommendations by one's colleagues on the basis of past successes. That practice is called allopathy, a word Hahnemann coined to encapsulate ignorance of any known relationship between the patient's symptoms and the medicine's effects in deranging health. Homoeopathy's basis is simple, testable, exacting, and certain: a knowledge of the symptoms a substance is capable of causing (not those it has cured), the symptoms being known as its pathogenetic symptoms, and their collection together being known as the medicine's pathogenesis; a knowledge of the character of the patient's symptoms (rather than knowledge of the name of her suffering); assessment of the similarity of the former to the latter; and painstaking comparison of this degree of similarity with the degree of similarity that other substances have in their pathogenetic symptoms to those of the patient. The use to which all this knowledge is put is the selection of the substance able to mimic most closely the symptoms of the patient's disease (a term I use in its broadest sense).
That is a homoeopathic prescription.
The case you have asked for help with contains no symptoms to speak of. If such a case record is the basis of the treatments you say the patient has been given with Thuja and Conium, then you cannot expect improvement through the mechanism of any homoeopathic relationship, as the record conains no basis upon which to prescribe homoeopathically. Only careful, detailed taking of the patient's case will provide her homoeopath with such a basis.
Moreover, unless you know how the patient's earlier medicines were prescribed, it is impossible to say whether either was able to act unimpeded either by the other or by its repetition in unchanged potency. If the two medicines acted on the patient simultaneously -- which would be difficult to avoid in such long-acting medicines prescribed in a period of a month -- then the prescription of the two was at least injudicious (though, as I note in my final paragraph below, there may exceptionally be good reason for it). First, the combination of effects of the two medicines is unknown -- and without knowledge of what a medicine causes, its homoeopathic prescription is impossible -- making prescription of the combination a blind one. Second, the synergy of medicinal effects of the two is not only unknown but simply unknowable. As Hahnemann has discussed in the Organon and I have discussed in mathematical detail on this list, uncertainties in the combined medicinal effects of two or more medicines are inherent in the instability of those effects; and those uncertainties obviate all possibility of a stable pathogenesis of the combination and therefore all possibility of knowledge of such a pathogenesis, the basis of all homoeopathic prescription.
Your notion of using Carcinosin may be based either on its name or on its reputation. Neither basis for prescription is any part of the practice of homoeopathy. Unless you know a reasonable range of symptoms that this particular Carcinosin -- as there are many variants of Carcinosin from different sources -- has caused (not cured, but caused), then it is impossible to prescribe it homoeopathically.
If you are not interested in homoeopathic prescription but in recommendations for medicines that may act against cancer, then a request for knowledge of "anti malignant medicines" will produce many appropriately hearsay suggestions. But from your discussion of the patient's treatment to date, you seem interested to prescribe or to assist in prescribing homoeopathically. If that is the case, then you need to understand these basic but crucial points: that homoeopathy cannot be practised without sure knowledge of the pathogenesis (the sum of known pathogenetic symptoms) of each candidate medicine and a careful comparison of each with the patient's symptoms.
That -- not any recommendation of anti-malignant medicines -- is your starting point in prescribing homoeopathically.
As a side note, let me add what may now be evident from the above: that homoeopathy has no medicines it can employ as antimalignants -- any more than it has antiphlogistics, anticatarrhals, stomachics, or astringents -- and that this is so simply because it does not seek to use a medicine's primary effects but only to invoke the organism's reaction to those effects. Thus, although an astringent medicine may be employed in homoeopathy partly on the basis of its astringent properties, it cannot be employed because the patient is exuding some liquid, as would be an enantiopathic prescription's basis; it can be employed for its astringent effects only because the patient's state already includes one of those astringent effects (as well as many others of the medicine's known effects), such as dryness of mucous membranes. Just so, if a medicine is employed in homoeopathy partly on the basis of its effects in cancer, that basis cannot be knowledge of its previous removal of tumours but only its known ability to cause or exacerbate tumour formation.
All the best with the patient. I'd strongly recommend that you take her out of the hands of anybody who has prescribed two long-acting remedies such as Thuja and Conium either together or in quick succession without good reason -- such as his realisation that the first medicine prescribed was the wrong one and that the second was a better choice.
Kindest regards,
John Harvey

[Shannon Nelson]

".... nothing to do with" seems a bit strongly put.
Do you disagree that genes are part of what determines our forms and functions?
Do you feel that genes have *anything* to do with *any* disease?
(Please note I said "part of"...)

[comdyne2002]

Genes play only a minor role in most disease conditions. Certain weaknesses in genetic lines that pass from one generation to another are possible but life style has a much greater influence. Cancer, however, has no hereditary genes. Take for instance the new rave about the BRAC 1/2 gene. A positive correlation has been established between cancer and this gene so scientists are quick to conclude that there is a genetic link. Perhaps there is but what they fail to say is that it is the radiation from the mammograms to which this gene is susceptible and it is of that radiation damage that almost guarantees that cancer will follow after exposure to the mammography machine. There is no safe level of ionizing radiation, all exposures, no matter how small, damage cells. Think about that the next time they want to screen you at the airport!

Far too many successful cancer cures have been developed over the years that have been truculently suppressed by the medical profession so that they can continue their most profitable scam, ie., cancer treatment. All of the successful treatments of this so-called disease saw it as a simple metabolic disorder. Low body temperature and chronic constipation coupled with a local injury was the magic combination that induced cancer. By correcting the diet and establishing intestinal homeostasis, the cancer went away. Time after time this has been the case. As it turns out the two most effective cancer protocols that work most of the time are the Gerson and the Budwig diets. I know several people who were told to clean up their affairs and visit their undertaker that are thriving today without any signs of cancer. One of them had pancreatic cancer diagnosed over 4 years ago!

Scientists must keep their game going to remain employed. They chase the inner workings of cellular biology and ignore the environment which induces the disease. In fact all disease is caused by the same mechanism which is hypoxia (cellular starvation for oxygen) at the cellular level. See Nobel Prize - Physiology 1931.

Lets say your prize pet fish showed signs of illness and had tumors forming on its body. The typical cancer nerd would excise the tumors and irradiate the poor creature knowing full well that it will die anyway. The alternative practitioner would simply change the water in the tank. Cancer is a metabolic disorder. Tumors form as a protection mechanism to prevent rotting tissue from spreading. The worst thing one could do it to puncture it via biopsy or worse, cut it out. The cancer will always return and when it does it will arrive in the most hostile of states having been angered by its prior molestation.

The best thing one can do when diagnosed with cancer in America is to see your travel agent. Carmi Hazen
------------------------------------------------------------------------"nothing to do with" seems a bit strongly put.

Do you disagree that genes are part of what determines our forms and functions?
Do you feel that genes have *anything* to do with *any* disease?
(Please note I said "part of"...)

[Tanya Marquette]

Saw the film Under Our Skin about Lyme disease.
While focusing totally on allopathic medicine, it did reveal the
control by special interests in how standards of treatment are decided.
There were some pretty sad stories about doctors losing their license
for acheiving cure with chronic lyme disease. One 78 yr old md was
taken to court in a case that dragged on 5 yrs as of the filming. It
was clearly apparent that all his patients turned out to testify and demand
the end to this witchhunt. That is probably why the case dragged on.
The sadest story was of this doctor who did his own private research
on lyme and why it couldn't be located in the body. He came up with
a microscope image of the spirichete coalescing into a mass covered
with a biofilm. The sad part was that he developed alzheimers and had
no memory of any of his research. The implication was that he had
contracted lyme and it took him down. That or it was simply a very
despondent ending.
Of course their protocol was horrific in my book: they used high dose,
very long term antibiotics.
Tim Bolen has an interesting site: Tim Bolen Report where he has an
article on the attack on holistic healing, or even new thinking in allopathy.
He traces the attacks by the status quo forces since 1996 (I think that
was the date). That was about the time that it was stated that
slightly more than 50% of health care visits were to holistic practitioners
and the income from these visits were about equal to that of allopaths.
He then begins to outline the organized attack on holistic healers and
nutritional treatment, ending with the development of the quackbusters.
There truly are many protocols that have worked successfully with cancer
that are hounded into the ground.
tanya

[Tanya Marquette]

I am more of the opinion that genes have very minimal impact on our general health.
They may give us potential predispositions, but not necessarily the disease.
And then we need to remember the impact of epigenetics which alter our gene expressions.
There is more and more information emerging that validates the impact of envirnonment on
our genes. And now we have the added onslaught of GMOs and other toxic chemicals which
do affect our genes/DNA.
Pretty horrific thinking about what the current BP oil debacle will be doing.
tanya

[Tanya Marquette]

carmi,
flooding the body with oxygen and turning the ph to alkaline is really old protocol.
there are many ways to do this. some people use oxygen drops or highly oxygenated
water. nutrition does this. the budwig diet would do this, too. but these magnets might
also work. i know many people use magnets for healing and like them. i only tried
them once without any benefit. i couple homeopathy with low level laser that stimulates
the production of ATP.
but thanks for sending this link. all good information to keep in mind.
tanya