ruling agains mandatory flu vaccine

[Tanya Marquette]

while not yet signed, as i gather from this article, it seems the district federal court in
new jersey has ruled against the mandatory vaccination of people. following is the
report with link to original complaint
U.S. JUDGE RULES AGAINST CUMPULSORY VACCINATION / COURT DOCUMENT

30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law: US Court issues an
injunction to stop it and to hold the the government and drug companies
responsible for reactions. A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory
vaccinations has been issued in the United States District Court of New
Jersey. This comes after a federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was
filed in that court by Tim Vawter, pro seattorney, on July 31st with the
federal government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary
Injunction, it will stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any
state to take flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state
or local government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person
who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional
rights. Vawters filings included a Complaint, and several pages of
evidentiary Exhibits. Vawters legal papers have been written not only for
filing in federal court, but additionally so they can be looked at by
activists around the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own
countries to help stop forced vaccinations. Vawter believes that as the
truth of the dangers of flu vaccines continues to become known, banning the
forced use of them will eventually succeed on a worldwide basis. He cautions
people to avoid fear and keep themselves focused on the task of blocking
forced vaccination. Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory
vaccinations in the U.S. The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary
Injunction and read the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary
Injunction that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount
of negligence with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of
the flu vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence
submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of the
flu vaccines. The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from
forcing any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against
that person s free will and free choice. The government will not allow any
state or local government, or any party, to force any person to be required
to take any influenza vaccination against that person?.?s free will and free
choice. U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of the
Constitution In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal
government has engaged in gross
negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that are proven to be
dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The vaccines scheduled for
use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals including thimerosal mercury,
which have been proven to cause autism in children with lowered immune
systems, and other dangerous and toxic ingredients. The federal government
has stated it will force these flu vaccines onto the American public against
their will, under a document signed by Health and Human Services Secretary
Kathleen Sebelius. He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn
billions of dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of
millions advertising a Phase 6 Pandemic that the evidence shows does not
really exist. The federal government has not required the
World Health Organization (WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There
has been no collection of facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being
questioned, hearings being held, or lie detector tests being given when
preposterous statements have been made. The WHO declared a massive Phase 6
Influenza Pandemic, even though only a few hundred people worldwide had so
far died of this swine flu virus, and when far more people die each year of
regular flu. Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show that
the federal government so poorly trained its employees that they eagerly
agreed with the unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to
the contrary. Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the
Constitution by allowing the government to enter homes and force people to
be vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for
vaccination. It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional rights by
depriving people of liberty without due process of law. Vawter charged that
the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by failing to
properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed medical
professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have caused serious
damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal mercury is being used
in the new flu vaccines being prepared. The government has failed to
investigate profiteering.. Billions of dollars in vaccine sales can cause
organizations to falsify threats so as to cause unwarranted public hysteria
leading to forced vaccinations. The government is guilty of gross negligence
because its employees failed to properly investigate the release of a case
of live swine flu virus. One of the main companies the government deals
with, Baxter Vaccines, was apparently involved in the transporting of live
bird flu virus that was released on a public train earlier this year. A lab
technician with the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had
traveled to Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with
the H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their container
allowed pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train was
pulling into a station. The highly reputable UK newspaper the Telegraph
reported on July 2nd that flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused
twenty-one of them to die. Vawter charged there is a preponderance of
evidence to show that government will not provide people being vaccinated
with a list of the vaccine ingredients and possible negative side effects
before they are vaccinated. Most of the public will not know this flu
vaccine contains thimerosal mercury. Vawter submitted an Order to force the
government to publish vaccine ingredients and side effects, and to give this
information to everyone who takes a flu vaccine, and do so at least 3 days
prior to their vaccination. A denial of this order would violate Plaintiff s
rights to demand the government obey the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution by requiring it to engage in freedom of speech. The First
Amendment not only allows a citizen to have freedom of speech himself, but
it allows a citizen to demand his government engage in freedom of speech
when it is promoting the use of such as these vaccinations to the public.
The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he
receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the
court system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which
grants the right to sue to recover for damages. Vawter submitted an Order to
deem unconstitutional any proclamation, rule or similar law that forbids
people from suing for damages resulting from the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.
Robert O. Young, Ph.D., D.Sc. Founder of THE NEW BIOLOGY Creator of the
SCIENCE OF ALKALINE LIVING for Health.
>
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-335421? ... s%2Flatest
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-335421?ref=feeds/latest >
*********************** COURT DOCUMENTS:

VAWTER v FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - Complaint & Related Documents - 1
READ/PRINT/DOWNLOAD DOCUMENT AT:

ated-Documents-1