Role of Peruvian bark Aph 26

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Dear John
Please re-read your posts eg - 11 August - I rcvd it at 00:58 where in place of answering simply you write 3 pages trying to analyse what the qn means!
So as to ease the question of whether ONLY homeopathy can cure (as per Hn's definition of cure) please explain what you understand by this statement from Aph 26
"This depends on the following homœopathic law of nature which was sometimes, indeed, vaguely surmised but not hitherto fully recognized, and to which is due every real cure that has ever taken place:"
Best wishes
Soroush

________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Harvey
Sent: 19 August 2009 12:49
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Role of Peruvian bark
Hi, Soroush --

I do hope that we can return to the subject of your interpretation of Hahnemann's meaning in § 26 and how you arrived at it; and I fear that this is merely another endless sidetrack. But if you'd be kind enough to tell me exactly what you'd like me to explain (perhaps an entire paragraph or a time and date), I'll do my best.

Thanks --

John
2009/8/19 >
________________________________
--
------------------------------------------------------------------

"The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled."

— Plutarch