Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Richard Nash- Shannon
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:51 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Richard Nash- Shannon »

Hello Shannon,
Just as an aside, sound, lengthy follow-up is a new thing for Scholten. In his earlier books there was a lot less of it. I was happy to see that he was persuaded to properly write up the cases in a format that should be equal in value to our evil counterparts.....the allopaths!

Best regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Shannon & Bob Nelson wrote:


Richard Nash- Shannon
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:51 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Richard Nash- Shannon »

Hello Dale,
Yes I agree that perhaps it's best to save your sanity. But I will add that while the case was being read and analysed/reviewed, I did a full trituration of the inside of my cheek with my teeth grinding away in anger/disgust.

Best regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dale Moss" wrote:


Luise Kunkle
Posts: 1180
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Luise Kunkle »

Hi Richard
As far as Scholten etc. are concerned, such peer review - when it does
occur - is at least not damned.

Peer review of "classical masters" is considered blasphemy!

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========


Vera Resnick
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Vera Resnick »

In some circles, to say anything negative about Scholten or Sankaran puts you truly beyond the pale (I think that's where my homeopathic home is!). And when you talk about the Organon, you can see people's eyes glazing over. So peer review of the modern gurus is not as straightforward as it may seem...

Vera


Paul Booyse
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Paul Booyse »

Hello Dale,
Ok, but how did the patient do?
regards,
Paul


Richard Nash- Shannon
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:51 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Richard Nash- Shannon »

Hello Paul,
As there are never follow-ups available, if so rarely, then we never get to know.
On a related note, Dr Luc DeSchepper in his seminars is always doing live cases that everyone works on then has them back again so that these sorts of questions are answered.

Best regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Booyse" wrote:


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Shannon Nelson »

"Never follow-ups"? What circumstance are you talking about? Many
seminars and many books *do* give follow-ups, including e.g. Scholten's
Lanthanides book (great follow-up evaluation), all of Mangialavore's,
and many others. I agree that when follow-up is lacking, it's a severe
lack!
Shannon


Dale Moss
Posts: 1544
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???

Post by Dale Moss »

Not well. It was the wrong remedy. As I recall, the patient dropped out of treatment.
Peace,
Dale


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”