provings???

[muthu kumar]

Thanks John - Yes I am back - have been hopping in and out and mostly confining myself to suggesting remedies for problem cases ( which is what I like to do mostly) and some fairly innocuous philosophy in practice type of questions-
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, John Harvey wrote:

[John Harvey]

Well, all of this discussion, without rare exception, will be familiar to you. Home, sweet home, eh?

John
2009/7/2 hahnemannian2002 >

[muthu kumar]

Well you probably read the Chaos theory stuff posted by Dale and responded to by Jean and myself...

This is the Cyclical pattern in all the chaos...every 6 months - 1 year these questions about 1) Definition of homeopathy and 2) Water dosing vs Dry Dosing 3) Single vs Combination 4) 4th edition vs 6th edition 5)What is a miasm 6) Is Sankaran a Shaman or Sham or Reincarnated Hahnemann

do the rounds.

Since I have already posted and reposted about all of these, I am really not interested that much in the same old , same old...
Let us say this snake has already caught its tail in the mouth - so is not going to do that kind of circular chasing again..
-- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, John Harvey wrote:

[John Harvey]

No, I haven't, yet; I have noticed that it keeps coming up, though I haven't always had the energy and time to invest in what seems to be a cause, shall we say, of limited potential.
2009/7/2 hahnemannian2002 >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."

— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)