Tom Daschle's voting record on Health Care
http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Tom_D ... h_Care.htm
an article that addresses Daschle's Health Reform
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 7522.story
excerpt from
The Health Care Blog
http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_he ... sa--1.html
Lynn
------------------------------------
At 08:20 AM 12/20/2008, you wrote:
Imagine Peace
Tom Daschle's Health Reform views
-
Tanya Marquette
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Re: Tom Daschle's Health Reform views
thanks lyn n for these links.
daschle scares me. he is being touted as having a progressive
view on health, but there is nothing progressive in his platform.
in reading his platform and the other 2 links all i could hear was that there are
47 million people without health care insurance and that means they are not
spending much money on allopathic care! i see nothing in his platform that
supports holistic protocols, vitamins, freedom of health choice, vaccine choice,
etc, etc, etc.
while talking about canadian drugs, he is still supporting selling drugs.
while talking about an independent medical board, all i can see is another fda
with decision-making powers that avoid a public discussion
while promoting universal medicare coverage, it is still mandatory coverage
which means people being forced to buy what they do not want
while talking about broad based coverage, he promotes a MINIMAL health
care platform which supports the Codex with its genocidal implications and
ongoing health disasters.
while talking all this pro-drug platform, he doesn't mention the insurance companies
while talking about examining 'what works,' he implies a rigid formulaic system of
medical delivery--individual difference be damned.
while promoting his system, he seems more concerned about minimizing the ability
of people to sue the medical industry for damage if they follow the formula.
and what was that vote about supporting human cloning!!!!!
tom daschle is not a progressive. he may be a doer and he may be correct in his
criticism of good ol' hilary as trying to appease all and pleasing none, but that says
nothing about what he will produce. i wouldn't fall for any of this. he needs to be
included in a heavy lobbying effort to meet our holistic needs. without this inclusion,
we will have nothing but a tighter system that protects the medical industry while
pretending to have provided health care.
tanya
daschle scares me. he is being touted as having a progressive
view on health, but there is nothing progressive in his platform.
in reading his platform and the other 2 links all i could hear was that there are
47 million people without health care insurance and that means they are not
spending much money on allopathic care! i see nothing in his platform that
supports holistic protocols, vitamins, freedom of health choice, vaccine choice,
etc, etc, etc.
while talking about canadian drugs, he is still supporting selling drugs.
while talking about an independent medical board, all i can see is another fda
with decision-making powers that avoid a public discussion
while promoting universal medicare coverage, it is still mandatory coverage
which means people being forced to buy what they do not want
while talking about broad based coverage, he promotes a MINIMAL health
care platform which supports the Codex with its genocidal implications and
ongoing health disasters.
while talking all this pro-drug platform, he doesn't mention the insurance companies
while talking about examining 'what works,' he implies a rigid formulaic system of
medical delivery--individual difference be damned.
while promoting his system, he seems more concerned about minimizing the ability
of people to sue the medical industry for damage if they follow the formula.
and what was that vote about supporting human cloning!!!!!
tom daschle is not a progressive. he may be a doer and he may be correct in his
criticism of good ol' hilary as trying to appease all and pleasing none, but that says
nothing about what he will produce. i wouldn't fall for any of this. he needs to be
included in a heavy lobbying effort to meet our holistic needs. without this inclusion,
we will have nothing but a tighter system that protects the medical industry while
pretending to have provided health care.
tanya