Dear Michel
I have found Dr Schroyen's team very receptive to any suggestions or positive when an error is pointed out to them.
If you find any errors or any suggestions, please take the time to drop them a line.
An Aerts is a good contact. An.Aerts@archibel.com
Rgds
Soroush
________________________________
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yaheiouy@yahoo.fr
Sent: 12 September 2008 17:57
To: Christine Gillen
Cc: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE : Fw: Fw: [Minutus] Fw: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Hi Chris,
I have not enough time to follow all the contributions
to the minutus but I read here and there things you wrote
and I thougt: Ouah, this girl understands something on
Bönninghausen's combination method ! ; if one excepts the small group of German experts of the Bönninghausens Gemeinschaft. I also came across the name of G.Dimiitriadis and his translation of the TTB.
Are you aware that he got his knolwedge from staying in Germany
by these experts? Although the translation of Dimitriadis
is the best up to now I do not like the layout of his book; there is no better layout than that of Bönninghausen's 1846 original. See in it especialy the cross references and you will understand a lot.
As to the "mistakes" in the radar translation I must confess the latter is not actually so bad after browsing rapidly it anew. But I do not use it cause I found out a much better, cheaper and simpler program which integrates in adidtion the local sides (back left, right; throat left, right, etc) which prove to be of paramount
importance, and the end of life additions of Bönninghausen himself collected by his own son.
I cannot understand and believe the way the radar team integrates
the additions from the original German sources: either they are neglectful or or incompetent Synthesis 10 is a real mess and it goes more and more badly. When I hear F.Schroyens doing conferences promoting his repetory around the world, being warmly acclaimed I almost restrain myself from laughing; this guy is not aware of the poor state of his Synthesis. Please Mr Scroyens renew the team!
Further information in the next episode...
P.S. This post is written on a mobile so be indulgent for the typing
Michel Ramillon
Christine Gillen wrote:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 6:56 AM
RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Soroush,
I used to report errors in the past on the Archibel's forum and this is exact that they are receptive. I had also contact with An Aerts. But when using Synthesis I found about one error every day... The task was too big... I cannot take time reporting them, explaining sometimes why it is an error. There is also probably a different point of view between them and I on how the repertory should be organized. I found that the translator of the german sources into english working for the Complete with Roger van Z. has a much better understanding of the meaning of german rubrics from old sources. At present I use most of the time the complete 2008 in english within the very elegant and esthetic ISIS program by Miccant Ltd in England when I feel a need for a larger repertory than the TTB. But many many times the TTB gives the correct remedy whereas the Complete with its too many additions from all and every sources let you tangled many a time with much checking in the MMs being required. Moreover the TTB program that I use includes the polarities, a facility of foremost importance not yet developped in big repertories. Apparently the program developing companies are not aware of its being essential.
Regards,
Michel.
From: finrod@finrod.co.uk
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:20 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Michel
I have found Dr Schroyen's team very receptive to any suggestions or positive when an error is pointed out to them.
If you find any errors or any suggestions, please take the time to drop them a line.
An Aerts is a good contact. An.Aerts@archibel.com
Rgds
Soroush
________________________________
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yaheiouy@yahoo.fr
Sent: 12 September 2008 17:57
To: Christine Gillen
Cc: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE : Fw: Fw: [Minutus] Fw: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Hi Chris,
I have not enough time to follow all the contributions
to the minutus but I read here and there things you wrote
and I thougt: Ouah, this girl understands something on
Bönninghausen's combination method ! ; if one excepts the small group of German experts of the Bönninghausens Gemeinschaft. I also came across the name of G.Dimiitriadis and his translation of the TTB.
Are you aware that he got his knolwedge from staying in Germany
by these experts? Although the translation of Dimitriadis
is the best up to now I do not like the layout of his book; there is no better layout than that of Bönninghausen's 1846 original. See in it especialy the cross references and you will understand a lot.
As to the "mistakes" in the radar translation I must confess the latter is not actually so bad after browsing rapidly it anew. But I do not use it cause I found out a much better, cheaper and simpler program which integrates in adidtion the local sides (back left, right; throat left, right, etc) which prove to be of paramount
importance, and the end of life additions of Bönninghausen himself collected by his own son.
I cannot understand and believe the way the radar team integrates
the additions from the original German sources: either they are neglectful or or incompetent Synthesis 10 is a real mess and it goes more and more badly. When I hear F.Schroyens doing conferences promoting his repetory around the world, being warmly acclaimed I almost restrain myself from laughing; this guy is not aware of the poor state of his Synthesis. Please Mr Scroyens renew the team!
Further information in the next episode...
P.S. This post is written on a mobile so be indulgent for the typing
Michel Ramillon
Christine Gillen wrote:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 6:56 AM
I used to report errors in the past on the Archibel's forum and this is exact that they are receptive. I had also contact with An Aerts. But when using Synthesis I found about one error every day... The task was too big... I cannot take time reporting them, explaining sometimes why it is an error. There is also probably a different point of view between them and I on how the repertory should be organized. I found that the translator of the german sources into english working for the Complete with Roger van Z. has a much better understanding of the meaning of german rubrics from old sources. At present I use most of the time the complete 2008 in english within the very elegant and esthetic ISIS program by Miccant Ltd in England when I feel a need for a larger repertory than the TTB. But many many times the TTB gives the correct remedy whereas the Complete with its too many additions from all and every sources let you tangled many a time with much checking in the MMs being required. Moreover the TTB program that I use includes the polarities, a facility of foremost importance not yet developped in big repertories. Apparently the program developing companies are not aware of its being essential.
Regards,
Michel.
From: finrod@finrod.co.uk
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:20 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Michel
I have found Dr Schroyen's team very receptive to any suggestions or positive when an error is pointed out to them.
If you find any errors or any suggestions, please take the time to drop them a line.
An Aerts is a good contact. An.Aerts@archibel.com
Rgds
Soroush
________________________________
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yaheiouy@yahoo.fr
Sent: 12 September 2008 17:57
To: Christine Gillen
Cc: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE : Fw: Fw: [Minutus] Fw: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Hi Chris,
I have not enough time to follow all the contributions
to the minutus but I read here and there things you wrote
and I thougt: Ouah, this girl understands something on
Bönninghausen's combination method ! ; if one excepts the small group of German experts of the Bönninghausens Gemeinschaft. I also came across the name of G.Dimiitriadis and his translation of the TTB.
Are you aware that he got his knolwedge from staying in Germany
by these experts? Although the translation of Dimitriadis
is the best up to now I do not like the layout of his book; there is no better layout than that of Bönninghausen's 1846 original. See in it especialy the cross references and you will understand a lot.
As to the "mistakes" in the radar translation I must confess the latter is not actually so bad after browsing rapidly it anew. But I do not use it cause I found out a much better, cheaper and simpler program which integrates in adidtion the local sides (back left, right; throat left, right, etc) which prove to be of paramount
importance, and the end of life additions of Bönninghausen himself collected by his own son.
I cannot understand and believe the way the radar team integrates
the additions from the original German sources: either they are neglectful or or incompetent Synthesis 10 is a real mess and it goes more and more badly. When I hear F.Schroyens doing conferences promoting his repetory around the world, being warmly acclaimed I almost restrain myself from laughing; this guy is not aware of the poor state of his Synthesis. Please Mr Scroyens renew the team!
Further information in the next episode...
P.S. This post is written on a mobile so be indulgent for the typing
Michel Ramillon
Christine Gillen wrote:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 6:56 AM
Re: RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Michel
Would it be possible for you to show us here, a few of the errors you have found? I would like to check them as well.
Also, when you mention the errors, are you referring to the TTB view itself?
What is your view on the Boenninghausen module in Radar as far as accuracy?
I use RU and Complete as well as Synthesis, and have that even though there may be differences in rubric names and maybe some omissions here and there, it is of no consequence in the general scheme of things as all n=eeds to be verified in MM anyway.
Robyn
--------------------------
Dear Soroush,
I used to report errors in the past on the Archibel's forum and this is exact that they are receptive. I had also contact with An Aerts. But when using Synthesis I found about one error every day... The task was too big... I cannot take time reporting them, explaining sometimes why it is an error. There is also probably a different point of view between them and I on how the repertory should be organized. I found that the translator of the german sources into english working for the Complete with Roger van Z. has a much better understanding of the meaning of german rubrics from old sources. At present I use most of the time the complete 2008 in english within the very elegant and esthetic ISIS program by Miccant Ltd in England when I feel a need for a larger repertory than the TTB. But many many times the TTB gives the correct remedy whereas the Complete with its too many
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:20 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Michel
I have found Dr Schroyen's team very receptive to any suggestions or positive when an error is pointed out to them.
If you find any errors or any suggestions, please take the time to drop them a line.
An Aerts is a good contact. An.Aerts@archibel.com
Rgds
Soroush
________________________________
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yaheiouy@yahoo.fr
Sent: 12 September 2008 17:57
To: Christine Gillen
Cc: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE : Fw: Fw: [Minutus] Fw: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Hi Chris,
I have not enough time to follow all the contributions
to the minutus but I read here and there things you wrote
and I thougt: Ouah, this girl understands something on
Bönninghausen's combination method ! ; if one excepts the small group of German experts of the Bönninghausens Gemeinschaft. I also came across the name of G.Dimiitriadis and his translation of the TTB.
Are you aware that he got his knolwedge from staying in Germany
by these experts? Although the translation of Dimitriadis
is the best up to now I do not like the layout of his book; there is no better layout than that of Bönninghausen's 1846 original. See in it especialy the cross references and you will understand a lot.
As to the "mistakes" in the radar translation I must confess the latter is not actually so bad after browsing rapidly it anew. But I do not use it cause I found out a much better, cheaper and simpler program which integrates in adidtion the local sides (back left, right; throat left, right, etc) which prove to be of paramount
importance, and the end of life additions of Bönninghausen himself collected by his own son.
I cannot understand and believe the way the radar team integrates
the additions from the original German sources: either they are neglectful or or incompetent Synthesis 10 is a real mess and it goes more and more badly. When I hear F.Schroyens doing conferences promoting his repetory around the world, being warmly acclaimed I almost restrain myself from laughing; this guy is not aware of the poor state of his Synthesis. Please Mr Scroyens renew the team!
Further information in the next episode...
P.S. This post is written on a mobile so be indulgent for the typing
Michel Ramillon
Christine Gillen wrote:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 6:56 AM
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1669 - Release Date: 12/09/2008 2:18 PM
Would it be possible for you to show us here, a few of the errors you have found? I would like to check them as well.
Also, when you mention the errors, are you referring to the TTB view itself?
What is your view on the Boenninghausen module in Radar as far as accuracy?
I use RU and Complete as well as Synthesis, and have that even though there may be differences in rubric names and maybe some omissions here and there, it is of no consequence in the general scheme of things as all n=eeds to be verified in MM anyway.
Robyn
--------------------------
Dear Soroush,
I used to report errors in the past on the Archibel's forum and this is exact that they are receptive. I had also contact with An Aerts. But when using Synthesis I found about one error every day... The task was too big... I cannot take time reporting them, explaining sometimes why it is an error. There is also probably a different point of view between them and I on how the repertory should be organized. I found that the translator of the german sources into english working for the Complete with Roger van Z. has a much better understanding of the meaning of german rubrics from old sources. At present I use most of the time the complete 2008 in english within the very elegant and esthetic ISIS program by Miccant Ltd in England when I feel a need for a larger repertory than the TTB. But many many times the TTB gives the correct remedy whereas the Complete with its too many
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:20 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] RADAR Was: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Dear Michel
I have found Dr Schroyen's team very receptive to any suggestions or positive when an error is pointed out to them.
If you find any errors or any suggestions, please take the time to drop them a line.
An Aerts is a good contact. An.Aerts@archibel.com
Rgds
Soroush
________________________________
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of yaheiouy@yahoo.fr
Sent: 12 September 2008 17:57
To: Christine Gillen
Cc: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE : Fw: Fw: [Minutus] Fw: How to learn the Boenninghausen repertory and method
Hi Chris,
I have not enough time to follow all the contributions
to the minutus but I read here and there things you wrote
and I thougt: Ouah, this girl understands something on
Bönninghausen's combination method ! ; if one excepts the small group of German experts of the Bönninghausens Gemeinschaft. I also came across the name of G.Dimiitriadis and his translation of the TTB.
Are you aware that he got his knolwedge from staying in Germany
by these experts? Although the translation of Dimitriadis
is the best up to now I do not like the layout of his book; there is no better layout than that of Bönninghausen's 1846 original. See in it especialy the cross references and you will understand a lot.
As to the "mistakes" in the radar translation I must confess the latter is not actually so bad after browsing rapidly it anew. But I do not use it cause I found out a much better, cheaper and simpler program which integrates in adidtion the local sides (back left, right; throat left, right, etc) which prove to be of paramount
importance, and the end of life additions of Bönninghausen himself collected by his own son.
I cannot understand and believe the way the radar team integrates
the additions from the original German sources: either they are neglectful or or incompetent Synthesis 10 is a real mess and it goes more and more badly. When I hear F.Schroyens doing conferences promoting his repetory around the world, being warmly acclaimed I almost restrain myself from laughing; this guy is not aware of the poor state of his Synthesis. Please Mr Scroyens renew the team!
Further information in the next episode...
P.S. This post is written on a mobile so be indulgent for the typing
Michel Ramillon
Christine Gillen wrote:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/12/2008 6:56 AM
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1669 - Release Date: 12/09/2008 2:18 PM