gunter's case

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Joy Lucas
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

gunter's case

Post by Joy Lucas »

Dear Gunter, I missed your original post re: your case, but may I ask the
following questions.

When you say "has problems to represent his boundary to somebody because he
don't like to misdoing something to somebody" - do you mean this to be...
like we say in English 'a doormat - he lets people walk all over him, he
can't say no to people in case he hurts their feelings?

Also am I right in this impression of this person? - he is closed
emotionally but friendly, he presents an image of himself in public but at
home/in private he is different? Is he covering up something? He has no time
for friends - because he chooses to work. Is this shyness which prevents him
socialising or his workload? Is he being selfish/self centred? What are the
"little things" which bother him at home? What do you mean when you say that
he can't see if somebody is underlaying in competitive situations or if
somebody suffers. Do you mean he can't stand suffering in others, neither
does he like competitiveness?

Finally, which acute Rx has he responded well to in the past.

Sorry for all the questions - hope you can add further information

Best wishes, Joy Lucas
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


Joy Lucas
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: gunter's case

Post by Joy Lucas »

Dear Gunter,

Thank you for all the extra information. I agree with Rochelle (I think it
was) who said Lycopodium. Timid, apprehensive, conscientious about little
things (trifles as the reps say), dictators at home but servile at work is
almost classic, sleepy through the day and sleepless at night, dreams of
fights. They have lots of nasal problems and the respiratory aspect is
usually pneumonia and there can be lung cancer. It is included in the
sympathetic rubric but....this seems very strong in your client and so it
has a bit of a question mark over it for me. When you bring in the multiple
allergies and the so called 'stringent' childhood I would also be
considering Carcinosin. Hope this helps, good luck.

Best wishes, Joy Lucas.

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


Gunter Paul
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2001 10:00 pm

Re: gunter's case

Post by Gunter Paul »

Dear Rochelle, Dear Joy

thanks for your qick answer.
Do you agree in prescribing potencies in this order:
30C
200C
1000C
depending on disappearance of body and then mental symptoms.
This is a recommendation of a homeophatic workingroup in Berlin, what i had
readed recently.

Sorry again for my poor english and thanks for your helpful statements.

Best regards
Gunter


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: gunter's case

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Of course you have to wait until the action of the first remedy has ran its
course before repeating.

You don't turn the start key in car with the engine running do you?

Same here!!

Rgds
Soroush


Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: gunter's case

Post by Rochelle »

I often prescribe like this 30C night 200C morning and 1M next night. I do
this with the instructions that if any of them cause a change then phone me
and don;t take the others. I prescribe this way especially for Carc. as I
feel it prevents the aggravations I was seeing from prescribing just one of
the potencies in a split dose.
Regards, Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: gunter's case

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Can you justify this mode of prescribing please.

I am yet to find any one who can give good reasons based on proper
homoeopathic philosophy that this is a correct mode of prescribing. May be
you can?

Rgds
Soroush


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”