Scientific - ( Past Lives ??)Again?!?

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
natrumur
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Scientific - ( Past Lives ??)Again?!?

Post by natrumur »

In actual practice all of the information is accumulated. If we do or
do not use the past life comments and if they are not germaine to the
largest symptom, they are not ignored, just put aside for future
reference. If I used everything someone told me, Herings stool will
have a hundred legs.
My practitioner instinct must be employed at all times to determine
the gravity of the statements (symptoms) and rubric-ed as per my
experience.
A client informed me that any time she took a homeopathic rx she
immediately had a mini past life review. (?) While I am interested, I
am not swayed by this, only record it to fit it into their puzzle
when applicable. If her initial complaint was insomnia and night
terrors, past life information may be useful, whether I believe in
them or not. If she is sitting their kissing an imaginary friend and
urinating on herself, I will also use the past life information but
in a different way. It doesn't matter whether I believe or not,
instinct is more logical in homeopathy than a science mind for a
succesful outcome of the healing process.
--- In minutus@y..., "Natasha" wrote:
is not "scientific". Homeopathy can be proven and it has been proven
in many different ways. It is only a myth that Homeopathy "cannot be
proven scientifically". Rather it is merely a position of the
Allopathic world that Homeopathy cannot be proved.
causation of specific range of new symptoms in a group of healthy
people or the absence of symptoms in a group of sick people with
similiar diseases? When "science" refuses to accept it, they only
display their own ignorance of natural laws and principles, for many
(well educated) people have investigated and accepted Homeopathy as a
science. Therefore, the judgement that Homeopathy is not scientific,
while perhaps commonly held, is not a true statement is merely a
opinion.
But because it is in keeping with natural law, it is consistant and
reliable. Just as while we cannot truly understand the universe, we
have re-discovered the natural laws and so we can calculate, rely,
and predict many things accurately based on natural laws.
equaling "electromagnetic energy -- which never gets destroyed, it
only transmutes" is not true. The body counteracts the action of the
remedy. We can also antidote remedies, so the energy is not
transmuted and it is not indestructable. Nothing in the living world
is indestructible.
but why incorporate it with Homeopathy? And, why attack homeopathy?
Does homeopathy not already have enough foes? I have my opinions on
past life experiences and reincarnation but I have only shared them
off list, I have no interest in promoting this topic on a Homeopathy
list.
reincarnation is
based on
including the
function. I do
rigidity.
the realm


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”