Dear Shannon
Thanks for comment. My position is that they are different with Hahnemann's theory. Which one is correct, only the success in practice and clinical benchmarkings could answer. I just sent a complete comment in this regard to minutus in replying soroush's comment. Please refer to the same
Regards
Shaddel
Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
Shaking the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms
-
F. Shaddel
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 6:33 pm
-
Dr Nader Moradi
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2001 10:00 pm
Re: Shaking the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms
Dear Dr. Shaddel,
My questions are in the blue color and spread in your email.
My questions are in the blue color and spread in your email.
-
Dr Nader Moradi
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2001 10:00 pm
Re: Shaking the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms
As Dr. Shaddel had sent me privately and as there are more questions to be discussed therefore I thought it is better to discuss each questions separately and in the group.
Regarding Multimiasmatic remedies Dr. Shaddel said according to Hahenamann "there is no muti-antimiasmatic remedy".
I asked: What about Nit-ac?. It is both in Sycosis and Psora.
Dr. Shaddel answered:
Good point but it is an old and solved question. If you have a quick look on Chronic Disease of Hahnemann, you will find that Hahnemann has clearly mentioned your answer:
" First, then, concerning sycosis, as being that miasma which has produced by far the fewest chronic diseases, and has only been dominant from time to time. This figwart-disease, which in later times, especially during the French war, in the years 1809-1814, was so widely spread, but which has since showed itself more and more rarely, was treated almost always, in an inefficient and injurious manner, internally with mercury, because it was considered homogeneous with the venereal chancre-disease; but the excrescences on the genitals were treated by Allopathic physicians always in the most violent external way by cauterizing, burning and cutting, or by ligatures.
These excrescences usually first manifest themselves on the genitals, and appear usually, but not always, attended with a sort of gonorrhoea* (Please Note to the meaning of attended)
... In such a case frequently secondary gonorrhoeas remain, which can only be cured by an anti-psoric treatment."
Now my question is:
First: what you have mentioned in above sentence:... In such a case frequently secondary gonorrhoeas remain, which can only be cured by an anti-psoric treatment." is about Common gonorrhea not Sycotic gonorrhea.
Second:
Hahnemann in Sycosis section of CD continues: ....The gonorrhoea dependent on the fig-wart-miasma, as well as the above-mentioned excrescences (i. e., the whole sycosis), are cured most surely and most thoroughly through the internal use of Thuja, * which, in this case, is Homeopathic, in a dose of a few pillets as large as poppy seeds, moistened with the dilution potentized to the decillionth + degree, and when these have exhausted their action after fifteen, twenty, thirty, forty days, alternating with just as small a dose of nitric acid, diluted to the decillionth degree, which must be allowed to act as long a time, in order to remove the gonorrhoea and the excrescences; i. e., the whole sycosis. It is not necessary to use any external application, except in the most inveterate and difficult cases, when the larger fig-warts may be moistened every day with the mild, pure juice pressed from the green leaves of Thuja, mixed with an equal quantity of alcohol.....
Therefore why Hahnemann recommends Nit-Acid for Sycotic gonorrhea? Does this type of Gonorrhea belong to Sycosis? if yes then Nit-ac is in both Sycosis and Psora if not then what is it? is it separate chronic miasm? or is a acute or intercurrent disease or other thing else?
Kind Regards,
Nader
Regarding Multimiasmatic remedies Dr. Shaddel said according to Hahenamann "there is no muti-antimiasmatic remedy".
I asked: What about Nit-ac?. It is both in Sycosis and Psora.
Dr. Shaddel answered:
Good point but it is an old and solved question. If you have a quick look on Chronic Disease of Hahnemann, you will find that Hahnemann has clearly mentioned your answer:
" First, then, concerning sycosis, as being that miasma which has produced by far the fewest chronic diseases, and has only been dominant from time to time. This figwart-disease, which in later times, especially during the French war, in the years 1809-1814, was so widely spread, but which has since showed itself more and more rarely, was treated almost always, in an inefficient and injurious manner, internally with mercury, because it was considered homogeneous with the venereal chancre-disease; but the excrescences on the genitals were treated by Allopathic physicians always in the most violent external way by cauterizing, burning and cutting, or by ligatures.
These excrescences usually first manifest themselves on the genitals, and appear usually, but not always, attended with a sort of gonorrhoea* (Please Note to the meaning of attended)
... In such a case frequently secondary gonorrhoeas remain, which can only be cured by an anti-psoric treatment."
Now my question is:
First: what you have mentioned in above sentence:... In such a case frequently secondary gonorrhoeas remain, which can only be cured by an anti-psoric treatment." is about Common gonorrhea not Sycotic gonorrhea.
Second:
Hahnemann in Sycosis section of CD continues: ....The gonorrhoea dependent on the fig-wart-miasma, as well as the above-mentioned excrescences (i. e., the whole sycosis), are cured most surely and most thoroughly through the internal use of Thuja, * which, in this case, is Homeopathic, in a dose of a few pillets as large as poppy seeds, moistened with the dilution potentized to the decillionth + degree, and when these have exhausted their action after fifteen, twenty, thirty, forty days, alternating with just as small a dose of nitric acid, diluted to the decillionth degree, which must be allowed to act as long a time, in order to remove the gonorrhoea and the excrescences; i. e., the whole sycosis. It is not necessary to use any external application, except in the most inveterate and difficult cases, when the larger fig-warts may be moistened every day with the mild, pure juice pressed from the green leaves of Thuja, mixed with an equal quantity of alcohol.....
Therefore why Hahnemann recommends Nit-Acid for Sycotic gonorrhea? Does this type of Gonorrhea belong to Sycosis? if yes then Nit-ac is in both Sycosis and Psora if not then what is it? is it separate chronic miasm? or is a acute or intercurrent disease or other thing else?
Kind Regards,
Nader
-
F. Shaddel
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 6:33 pm
Re: Shaking the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms
Dear Nader
Hi, As Minutus is not for two sided discussions, perhaps it is better that I forward my complete response to you so other people also will be able to follow the discussion if interested.
Regards
Shaddel
Dear Nader
Thanks for your questions. Please find your answers in dark red. I sent it to you directly but if you are sure about correctness of your IMOs, forward it to Minutus
Kind Regards
Shaddel
Dr Nader Moradi wrote:
Dear Dr. Shaddel,
My questions are in the blue color and spread in your email.
Hi, As Minutus is not for two sided discussions, perhaps it is better that I forward my complete response to you so other people also will be able to follow the discussion if interested.
Regards
Shaddel
Dear Nader
Thanks for your questions. Please find your answers in dark red. I sent it to you directly but if you are sure about correctness of your IMOs, forward it to Minutus
Kind Regards
Shaddel
Dr Nader Moradi wrote:
Dear Dr. Shaddel,
My questions are in the blue color and spread in your email.