Shaking in the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms

[F. Shaddel]

Shaking in the foundation of Hahnemann's theory of Miasms:
http://drinlove.blogspot.com/
Regards
Shaddel

[muthu kumar]

Hi Shaddel-

Many of our remedies are multi-miasmatic even from Hahnemann's time.
Think about Lycopodium for example,

Tuberculine miasm itself seems to be composed of elements of 2
miasms...

So I do not understand what it is being implied or discussed here...
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "F. Shaddel" wrote:

[Luise Kunkle]

Hi H.,
The way I understood Shaddel he said that Hahnemann himself did not
talk about remedies being multi-miasmatic. This to my knowledge is
true at least for the CD.

Did he say differently any other place?

This was later. Hahnemann did not talk about Tuberculinism as a miasm
- he definitely listed Tuberculosis under Psora.

To Hahnemann the miasms were Psora, Sycosis and Syphilis. Everything
else originates from other homeopaths. So did the idea of remedies
being multi-miasmatic.

At least is what I think I know - does anyone else know differently?

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

[muthu kumar]

In the link this was the question:

Remedies can be anti-multimiasmatic- the approach that we have seen
advocated is to attack the dominant one -

I was just responding to that information in the link.
-------------------------------
N: I have a question: do you believe in a remedy can be anti-
multimiasmatic?

My answer( shaddel): No

---------------------------
Personally as I have repeatedly said, I do not set much store by
miasms in my practice.

Now a days people have different meanings for miasms - each writer /
master believes what a miasm is, what diseases come under it and how
to interpret it. It is interesting to watch that play out in
different writings.

I would like to see someone who is totally free of chronic miasms in
my ( or any one else's) practice.

Has any one seen such a creature?

My assumption is any one who comes for treatment is chronic
miasmatic. Only question is what is active and what is presenting...

Well at least that is how I deal with it?
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Luise Kunkle wrote:
time.
not
miasm
Everything
differently?
here...