Pottyopathy, homoeopathy, and why one is not the other[Was:For John Harvey]

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Tanya Marquette
Posts: 5602
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm

Pottyopathy, homoeopathy, and why one is not the other[Was:For John Harvey]

Post by Tanya Marquette »

yes, sx are sx. but the combination of sx and the depth to which
they take root i think can be a particular problem. i have to
wonder how hahnemann would respond today. he was such an experiementer,
trying new and different styles of working. so, while i agree that
there are core elements that make homeopathy, homeopathy, i still
think there is room for some development without making the sytstem
something else.
tanya


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Pottyopathy, homoeopathy, and why one is not the other[Was:For John Harvey]

Post by Shannon Nelson »

On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Tanya Marquette wrote:
Yup, and 6 editions worth sez that Hahnemann did too.
:-)


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”