Another combos phenom

[ForumGal]

Dear all,
I just hafta share this.
I carry "heart" rems with me at all times (I had slash/burn/poison in the late 80s, which has just been shown again to damage the heart: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 163944.htm).
The rems I carry are cactus grande, arnica, aconite, gloninum (palative), and crotalus hor, and they're all in a little wallet in my pocket. So I'm walking around today and I feel a pain in the heart region. So I stand still, take out the wallet . . . and hold it to my thymus area, i.e., muscle test the whole batch. I lean decidedly forward, which means I need at least one of those rems. So i take out each tube, muscle test it, and come up with arnica, take it, feel better.
The deal is, the whole wallet tested yes, even though only one rem tested yes individually (and worked). This "evidently" says something about combos -- that the several rems contained in a combo may include among them the one needed, and the others don't seem to interfere with that indication.
?

Best,
Margaret in Boston
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com

[muthu kumar]

Looks like I would need some of those heart remedies- Aconite - Fear
and anxiety about homeopathy's future-

This is not just blind leading the blind - it is someone blind, deaf
and mute leading the blind....

When there is all this discussion whether combos work or not - you
claim to bring in evidence from muscle testing / dowsing etc.

Treating one confusion with another confusion - following Similia
similibus?

Muscle testing or otherwise - I have seen in practice that there is
remedy interference if not in bottles at least if you take them into
your body - for example if you had taken all the 5 there might have
been interference from one to the other- and the question is why
take just 5 and why not 15? Why leave out Iberis, Crategus,
Spigelia, Naja, Lobelia etc?

Combos work - not denying it - many times we do not get clarity; we
cannot individualize where individualization is needed, follow-up is
difficult etc...

It is like using an axe for doing tonsillectomy when you have a
surgeon's precision knife...there may be a place for it - like
during French revolution - but still we should try for precision
first -

Question to all of the muscle testers out there-

Why not muscle test in Root Chakra ( Muladhara) area instead of
Thymus area? What is so grand about Thymus?
-- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, ForumGal@... wrote:
slash/burn/poison in
heart:
gloninum
in my pocket. So
So I stand
i.e., muscle
need at least one
up with
one rem
something about
among them the one
indication.

[Shannon Nelson]

Welll, I would say "maybe"...
One of the things I've found a bit tricky with muscle testing, is that
if you don't ask the right question, you don't get the right answer.
So in that situation, I'd have wanted to specify--"Is this entire group
as a unit helpful now?" and "Is it one among the group that's helpful?"
And maybe even, "Would a combo remedy made of all of these remedies be
effective for me now?" And, "Would it be fully as effective as ...?"
) That's my thoughts...
Shannon

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

No Margaret - all it did was to indicate something in that pack was suitable to you.
You can do it with large packs and the same result would be obtained - would you then take 40 remedies at once?

Regards

Soroush

[Luise Kunkle]

Hi Margaret,

This is an excellent deduction.

If you are dedicated enough to make a guinea pig out of yourself you
should next time this happens take all the remedies together and see
whether they help (at all/somewhat but not as well as the single
remedy...)

This would really be meaningful research, don't you think?

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========