Attacking others vs. straightforward discussion

[Charlotte Gilruth]

Dave Hartley wrote:

"Lisa seems to feel that it is appropriate to redefine rubrics in repertory
without the slightest regard for their relationship to materia medica, then
proceed to Rx on what exists in her imagination alone.

I submit that Lisa basically has practically no knowledge of homeopathy, and
has been learning this perverse "method" for about 2 years, and really ought
to be encouraged to learn basics of homeopathy and to cease making ignorant
statements (or recommendations on cases) until she can do so in a manner
which is RATIONALLY consistent with homeopathy.

It seems like Lisa has Fear of a little Hard Work in learning the basics,
and Desire for Shortcut to Pedestal from which to Pontificate."
Dear Dave,
I object to this unnecessary rudeness. This is not the appropriate way to
make your points. Why not explain what does WORK for you rather than
attacking others? You say you are only wanting to talk about homeopathy,
but your language and tone definitely steps over the line into personal
attack. Be honest!
Sincerely,
Charlotte Gilruth

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]