"so-called"???
I'm happy to debate what I do or do not do - minus the insults.
I assure you that if my repertorizing technique was as shoddy as you
imply, I would not have healthy cats after the vet calls them incurable.
...and whatever else will help the case to achieve returned health,
based on good knowledge and a reasoned appraoch added to a simillimum.
It has often occurred in the past that we saw an effect we liked
before we understood why we saw it. Hippocrates saw the effect of likes
curing likes too, but did he understand what he was looking at? Do we?
Whether we do or not, it does not change that is happens.
And with respect - whether you agree with what I do or not - the
results are restored health in more cases than with simillimum alone,
for a statistically significant number of cats.
I add everything I know how that helps - to the simillimum - to restore
health. If doing a rain dance would restore health to the cats I'd be
rain-dancing too
Nope.
I do not do guesswork, and it is inappropriate to suggest it.
Hahnemann did not either - he did meticulous experiments always based on
what he learned before - that's not guesswork either.
I use the same principle.
So any criticism on your list of objections is indeed "possible" but
that does NOT make it likely and it does NOT make it guesswork.
It seems that if it is something new and added to what Hahnemann did -
then you do not want to accept that addition - and feel that a
simillimum will either cure or the case is "incurable". That's your
prerogative.
That also seems to be where we differ.
I am an optimist and wish to cure the "incurable"
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."