Lightening

[radha rani]

Have you also checked with electrictas( stmospheric and static) and the patient need to avoid bath from the water boiled with electricity like geysers etc. Also shouldn't we think of opium for the shock occured and stunned them ? A single dose of Opium 1M and few doses of electrictas should prove
Adding to that a blind approach is star of bethlehem in Bach Flower therepy.

Jean Doherty wrote:
________________________________

Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.

[radha rani]

Phosporus we give only when the patient has the fear of thunderstorms and lightenings, You have Rhododendron too, But in this case the issue is from a sudden shock, accident.
Aconite was well administrated already. Following would be Opium for further mind symptoms, and however , if the field of lightening and electricity has influence, we need to think of electrictas (atmospheric and static) .In addition star of Bethlehem from Bach flower should do wonders.

I have administrated the star of Bethlehem to many in shock cases resulting in best results.

Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
________________________________

Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.

[Shannon Nelson]

A small point of disagreement...
I've read/been told over and over that one must not rule out a remedy
based on *absence* of any symptom(s)--we choose on the basis of that
*is* there, not based on what is not.

My personal experience to that end is my own very good run of several
years with phos as a "constitutional" remedy--but loved thunderstorms
rather than fearing them. (I do not think phos was my "perfect
simillimum", yet it was very serviceable, and that's quite good enough
for an acute situation.)

But I definitely agree that it's not necessarily the remedy needed for
this case; one would look at the overall case... And I quite agree
that "lightning" might not have been the defining issue of the case,
either!
Best wishes,
Shannon

[radha rani]

I agree with the Robert & shannon's opinion and i respect the deep care towards the perfection in selection of a drug. Like any medicine should be selected based on " what is" rather " what is not" may not fit for a criteria for selection of a drug as a whole. I pressume this because there are medicines that we need to rule out on " what is not" and we also have medicines to rule out on " what is" and the choice may vary depending upon the bipolarity of a drug.

For example ....we have a bryonia picture almost same in many of the materia medica's and every expert of homeo knows that least movement aggrevates the symptoms and the patient never wants to move. But the secondary stage of Bryonia we have is misguiding and wondering.It absolutely misguides the doctor or observer to be RhusTox. Because patient can not stay still and wants to move here and there like in arnica and rhustox. Movement amelerates. But we seldom see such secondary stages of bryonia. Also one has to pass the 1st stage and then reach the second stage only known to the doctor in continuity from the first stage. If the patient approaches a New homeo doctor he would go for arnica or rhustox . In this case should we consider " what is " or " what is not " ?

You have same thing in Ignatia too. You have the same thing in Hypericum too.In few cases we take for what is and in few cases we consider for what is not for ruling out. We does this because if we could see the totality as dynamic or static we would be knowing what is to be ruled out is or isnot.

This is just my opinion.
In phosphorus what shannon has said may be true.

thank you.

radharani.

Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
________________________________

The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.

________________________________

Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.

[Jean Doherty]

Thankfully they have been taking Rescue Remedy which contains Star of Bethlehem. Thank you for your interest. Jean

[radha rani]

its in bulk

radha rani wrote:
________________________________

________________________________
________________________________

We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.

________________________________

Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.