Scientific medicine, was: Ancient Wisdom and Acute diseases- the Paradox - To Luise

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
dimitri rolf
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:00 pm

Scientific medicine, was: Ancient Wisdom and Acute diseases- the Paradox - To Luise

Post by dimitri rolf »

Hello Luise,
i loved the way you put your email in order ( Dimitri: blah blah, Luise: Blah blah ) so i will use it now.

Luise:
Give me some examples where he did, i. e. where he did accept
something coming from someone else.

Dimitri:
you wrote:
"Hahnemann, of course, was not a really true scientist.
He refused to
To me this phrase means that Hahn. would reject everything until he found out himself that the other opinion is correct. Isnt it? Thats why i say that: " It didnt seem right to him and he rejected it! and he
Luise:
Take the matter of double remedies. He agreed to v. Boenninghausen
that they might be useful and was going to include something in his 5th
Organon. But then he didn't. Why? Because he had found out that they
were not good? No! Because news of his plans to do so had leaked and
his arch-enemy Griessenich had heard about it - and G was "smirking" -
and Sam could not allow that (This is what he wrote to v.
Boenninghausen, I have read the letter) -- Mark of a true scientist by
your definition??
Dimitri:
I dont see anything Non-scientific here. I see someone trying to protect his work (using a wrong way though...). On the contrary, i see someone accepring someone else' s theories and opinions.
Your saying that he agreed to Boenninghausen also contradics this phrase of yours: "was not based on
his not accepting but on his not listening and considering their views
before rececting them.".
Luise:
Most scientist outside of big pharma and regular medicine - those that
have nothing to do with them - consider homeopathy quackery.

I dont know about you, but i cannot call them scientists. At the end of the day, a person who has never tried chocolate in his life, should not say that he doesnt like chocolate. :-)
I will visit Stuttgard. As i see on the German map, cologn is relatively close. How many km distance between Cologn and Stuttgard?
Who knows, maybe i could come and visit you! Maybe even consult you as a patient!! Depends on what you charge. :-D

I want to buy a mini cooper (the old style), and Germany is much cheaper.
I live in North west Greece, in the greek part of macedonia.

Regards,
Dimitri
Hi Dimitri,
the reason is probably spelled YAHOO:-)

your first 3-4 posts can be seen (the titles of the emails), but the cotent cannot be read... and it has nothing to do with the character decoding cause i tried it and , of course it has nothing to do with me trying to avoid answering.

Dimitri:

He refused to

Luise:

You misread or misinterpreted something. My calling him "not a true
scientist (by your definition, with which I agree)" was not based on
his not accepting but on his not listening and considering their views
before rececting them.

Dimitri:
BUT, he

Luise:

Give me some examples where he did, i. e. where he did accept
something coming from someone else.

Take the matter of double remedies. He agreed to v. Boenninghausen
that they might be useful and was going to include something in his 5th
Organon. But then he didn't. Why? Because he had found out that they
were not good? No! Because news of his plans to do so had leaked and
his arch-enemy Griessenich had heard about it - and G was "smirking" -
and Sam could not allow that (This is what he wrote to v.
Boenninghausen, I have read the letter) -- Mark of a true scientist by
your definition??

Dimitri:
Luise:

No of course not. It is necessary if we want to improve.

Dimitri:

Science has already given

Luise:

No, not really. Some scientists have voiced that hypothisis and some
agree to the possibility. No more.

Dimitri:

Its narrow mind people and big

Luise:

Most scientist outside of big pharma and regular medicine - those that
have nothing to do with them - consider homeopathy quackery. At least
the homeopathy based on higher potencies than Avogadro's number will
allow;-)

There are indeed approaches to high potencies (IMO) from the sciences
that work with ultra-high dilutions kind of thing - there was on
then-Lyghtforce List a chemical engineer who worked in the field and
posted about it - sorry to say she stopped posting because she could
not stomach the mobbings - but they have not yet seen any connections
to the high-potency problem, although Avogadro's number may not
relevant to what they found either.

Dimitri:

To all the other things, we

Oh, I hope I am not that bad. I am not a scientist myself and I do try
to write that people can understand. Where I do not, it is not
intention but inadequacy.

And i would prefer to discuss with a woman

Well, with me it is more simple: I am ready to discuss any way as long
as it is the topics that are attacked. Attack my opinion - fine, as
long as you give reasons. Attack me - and the discussiion is closed.

I try to discuss that way myself - I think most of the time I succeed.
Where not, it is again not intention but inadequacy on my part:-)

So, you are from Germany?

Near Cologn - for exact address Linux users may type in the command
line "whois bar-do.net" or consult the German telephone book. There is
only one Luise Kunkle listed. I live in a glass house:-))

I' ll be visiting your country in February

I hope you will enjoy it. Are you going to visit homeopaths or
seminars or is your purpose different?

Where do you live?

Regards

Luise

________________________________

The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.


Luise Kunkle
Posts: 1180
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: Scientific medicine, was: Ancient Wisdom and Acute diseases- the Paradox - To Luise

Post by Luise Kunkle »

Hi Dimitri,
I hope many posters follow your example - I sometimes find it very
hard to sort the posts myself.
Luise:

Well, it is hard to put into a few phrases in a post (or elsewhere)
what I found out in many hours of reading and researching, so the
statements will necessarily be imprecise.

Yes, it seems that v. Boenninghausen was the ONE person whose methods
he accepted or did for one reason or other not attack. I suppose
no-one on this list except perhaps you, is interested in my backups of
this, which would necessarily be long. I may one day write an article
on it - but it would be in German I found quite a sizeable minority of
homeopaths on the German-language list who are interested in my
published work on v. Boenninghausen and none on the English-speaking
lists where I introduced it - so I am not going to spend my time on
translating my German publications into English any longer.

If the homeopathy need to see Hahnemann and v. B. surrounded by a aura
of perfection and holyness I do not feel it is my calling to
change that:-) (This is why I do not anser Chris Gillen's post)

Dimitri

Luise:

Yes, I go along with common useage of the word and call them
scientist, as they call themselves - just as I call those people
homeopaths who commonly are called thus and who call themselves so.

I do not call them "true scientists".

Dimitri:
Luise:

Roughly 300 I think.

I hope you will visit the "Insitute of the History of Medicine" of the
Robert Bosch Foundation ( Short IGM Bosch) in Stuttgart while you are
there.

It is worth even a short visit, even more so a longer. I stayed there
for a month 2 years ago, and even that was too short (for me).

The people there, starting with the students working there up to Prof.
Juette, the head, are very nice - pleasant, competent and helpful.

Dimitri:

Luise:

Your visit would be welcome, of course.

As to consultation: I no longer practice and when I did, my main
method was TCM (the acupuncture part). Most of what I know of
homeopathy I learned after retiring, by taking up studying again - so
it is theory, not hardened by much practice. So this would not be
worth your effort - although I would not charge anything:-)

I do, however, know a homeopath who, by what I know about him, should
be excellent -- very classical but without any blinkers. Probably
close to what I call a true scientist. I do not know what he charges -
but if you are interested I can get you in touch with or
point to more information about him.

Dimitri:

Luise:

I do not eve know what that is:-)

Dimitri:

Luise:

This part of Greece I do not know.

Tell me about it by pm - only if you like to, of course.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”