brain injury

[Jean Doherty]

Deepest sympathy,Jean

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Dear Deepak

A very sad story and my condolences.

It is a shame that Allopaths give no recognition to the power of
homoeopathy.

Rgds
Soroush

[muthu kumar]

My condolences-

You did whatever you could- given the hospital policies etc. Even
though we can blame the doctor from a homeopathist point of view - the
doctor had a responsibility and could not allow what is - from his
point of view- an untested and unreliable form of therapy to interfere
with his regimen and jeopardize what is already a critical case-

Homeopathy might or might not have helped - even homeopaths die- at
least you could get him to a hospital and help with whatever you could

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Deepak Sharma"
wrote:

[radha rani]

Dear Deepak,

An introduction to alternate Medicines in such traumas and mechanical injuries should be made as a part of syllabus for allopaths. Also there is no mistake occured in your approach and within the limited scope of the situation.
In mechanical injuries like that, we can not depend upon single remedy or single system. You done best what you could . condolences.
Natrum sulph and Bryonia instead of belladonna would have better because when the movement started vomitings occured.........
take care.

Finrod wrote:
________________________________

Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

[Jean Doherty]

Agree wholeheartedly. Also very good minds which many of them have are needed in analysis BUT how can this be achieved How can we get them interested??/ Something really serendipitous needs to happen. Maybe just the thought of this possibility will help Jean

[muthu kumar]

While I agree in spirit there are many problems-

1) Treating severe trauma esp. to the head has become a specialized
field - even GPs in allopathy do not get to do it - it is highly
doubtful if in such a specialized field alternative medicines will be
considered...

2) For all the experience/capabilities we have for treating injuries -
our experience with trauma like this - brain stem injury etc- is
limited.We can only say that it will be an experimental step at
best-how many cases of brain stem injury have we treated?

3)For all our hope, we cannot say that our medicines will definitely
act . I have written before of 2 rabies cases. One a homeopathic
doctor - another a homeopathy enthusiast. Following a dog bite both
refused allopathy prophylaxis and medical care and subsequently died.
Medicines like Hydrophobinum and others like Stramonium etc. were
given- to no avail. Even Gandhi was criticized for not allowing
allopathic treatment for his ailing wife and she subsequently died. (
Not that allopathy would have saved all of them)- but at least shows
that advocating homeopathy for such cases is different - actually
effecting a cure is different.

4)Cases like this subdue the vital force itself. We do not know if
there is enough turnaround time for the medicine to induce a healing
reaction from the vital force. These conditions perhaps fall into the
category for which even Hahnemann suggested allopathic care.

5)Yes - in an ideal world all modalities should be available for the
patient and his/her care must be the only concern of every medical
practitioner. Of course we know that this is a political world and we
know that "all are equal but some are more equal than others ".

When we have people within our groups who are set dead against
allopathy, we should not be surprised when that feeling is reciprocated.

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Jean Doherty wrote: