recent Vithoukas article on homeopathy... and Sankarans methods/now Organon

Robyn · Post by **Robyn** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:34 am

Another Australian training ----We did 150 hours out of 4,150 hour course on hom. philosophy, in 3
separate subjects over the first 3 years of the course, using the Dudgeon edition and other texts.
The course I did was not the same as Michelle's, but in the same vicinity/location, and following
national standards that were set in place at that time in this country (1997).

I guess we were lucky here, to have so many hours devoted to this aspect.

Robyn

Saalome gam naan ben uurda, gan njjber asaala hesporoona!

Peace be on Earth, and among all beings!

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.19/556 - Release Date: 11/28/2006 3:22 PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

totalyouhealth · Post by **totalyouhealth** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:40 am

I can attest to the fact that I have 1000's of hours in studying
homeopathy. I am an ND and certainly would not put homeopath on
my "business card" at this point. I think it depends on how much
the student/professional wants to learn and be good at their
profession and really help people; isn't that what it is all about?
I have spent more then 220 hours reading this group and others alone
and learning from others. It all comes down to the individual and
how much they want to be a "Homeopath". Will any of us ever be done
studying? Just because the school can only list or fit a small
amount of hours into their programs does not mean a person that
really wants to learn the tools will not spend many many more hours
working towards their goals. Thanks Kathy
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Robyn" wrote:
hour course on hom. philosophy, in 3
Dudgeon edition and other texts.
vicinity/location, and following
country (1997).
aspect.
11/28/2006 3:22 PM

Shannon Nelson · Post by **Shannon Nelson** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:23 am

Hi Robyn,
What's the structure of that 4,150 hour course--I mean in
hours-per-week, years-total, etc.? (Trying to correlate it to courses
I'm familiar with.)
Thanks!
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Luise Kunkle · Post by **Luise Kunkle** » Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:49 pm

Also, do not forget that many, if not most, if not all of the modern
"greats" of homeopathy have learned by self-study or at most some
lectures/seminars.

As far as the Organon goes: IMO it is much better for a sudent to read
it by her/himself and come to their own own conclusions than to learn
the interpretation of their respective teachers, which again were
derived from the interpretation of their teachers and so on.

AFTER you have got your own opinion fairly settled it will probably be
good to discuss it with others, read up different interpretations
(after all there are multitudes of them).

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Paul Booyse · Post by **Paul Booyse** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:34 pm

Hi Luise,
That is the problem. The Organon should be read as is. Not with opinion.
A medical student studying anatomy does study with opinion. Thety study what
is written in black and white. If what is written is not clear, the one
has to go further, but actually the Organon is very clearly written.. It
has a set logic in the layout, and and clear storyline from start to finish.
One has to read it as the "unprejudiced observer". It's not about
interpretation and it's not about opinion. That is what has got us into
this mess. And Hahnemann was battling with the vitalists in his day as
well.

Regards,
paul

Paul Booyse · Post by **Paul Booyse** » Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:28 am

Correction:
That is the problem. The Organon should be read as is. Not with opinion.
A medical student studying anatomy does NOT study with opinion.

apologies for the typo

Paul

Kathleen Ramsey · Post by **Kathleen Ramsey** » Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:40 pm

Without opinion your joking right

Kathy
_____

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Booyse
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 10:47 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: recent Vithoukas article on homeopathy... and
Sankarans methods/now Organon
Correction:
That is the problem. The Organon should be read as is. Not with opinion.
A medical student studying anatomy does NOT study with opinion.

apologies for the typo

Paul
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Dr. Lau · Post by **Dr. Lau** » Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:24 am

100% setuju !