Potencies - Interview of Dr. Luc De Schepper

[Rik Shannon]

Just a few clarifications: Luc does not always use
LM's. Nor does he always use Split-dose. Nor does he
he use anything exclusively. The similimum is the
right rx. at the right potency, at the right dose.
These are determined by the first assesment of the
pt.'s overall sensitivity and then by the reaction to
the first dose. For Luc everything is sensitivity. And
LM's are a great way to deal w/ hypersensitives. (I
have also found them of great use in one-sided disease
states, especially when working through allopathic
meds, and when a state dictates that palliation is the
only possibility.) He has given a dose dry in many
cases, especially if there is no water! His time
working in S.E. Asia after the tsunami was riddled w/
problems of getting clean water. He will also recount
plenty of high C potency acute stories where there was
no time for a split dose and he gave it dry. There are
many instances where he will start w/ a 6C split dose
due to his trepidation regarding the pt's sensitivity,
especially advanced pathologies or M/E states that are
unstable.
As for his next seminar in Vegas, I hope to see
you there Sheri.
Peace and prosperity, Rik

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Sheri Nakken]

At 05:17 AM 10/17/2006 -0700, you wrote:

Yes, I'll BE THERE! Yeah!
Looking forward to meeting you.
Sheri

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936

[Shannon Nelson]

Hi Rik,
Why would one-sided diseases be particularly appropriate for LMs?
Thanks,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[muthu kumar]

I would think it must be because one can repeat LMs to palliate
without aggravation...
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Robert & Shannon Nelson
wrote:

[Shannon Nelson]

But palliation wouldn't be the goal--instead we want to "kickstart" the
reaction and bring out a fuller picture. I don't know why LMs would do
that more efficiently than Cs (whether high or low); but if palliation
is the best that can be done in a given situation, Cs can do that too.

I know that LMs are said to be more "repetition-friendly", but Cs in
water are equally so, aren't they? And as we've all heard
there's disagreement over the idea that there's any (or much) problem
with repeating low Cs anyway, and why would a one-sided disease be apt
to need more repetition anyway... I'm not trying to be argumentative,
just don't understand.
Best,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Sheri Nakken]

At 06:13 PM 10/17/2006 -0500, you wrote:

They are repeated as necessary and only if succussed to increase potency of
each dose.

Sheri
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936

[Shannon Nelson]

Thanks Sheri--
But how would that be different from using Cs in water? I mean, what
would be the particular connection between "one-sided dx" and LMs?
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[muthu kumar]

I thought at least you have read Organon - even if I have not
Apparently not so - better get 6th edition and go thru that...
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Robert & Shannon Nelson
wrote:

[Rik Shannon]

Shannon,
Other than subjective extrapolation, I don't have
an answer as to why LM's would have the affect they do
in one sided disease states. We could hypothesize that
when a disease state has destroyed something, i.e.
tissue or a gland, that the VF is in a particular
conundrum that reacts well to this particular potency.
I have seen it time and again work through many meds
at the end of life and still affect profound change,
i.e. palliation, i.e. calmness, tranquility, pain
relief etc. That is not to say that I have not also
seen this w/ C's. but just much less frequently.
Peace and prosperity, Rik

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Shannon Nelson]

Okay, I can go with that. (Tho I was not associating "one-sided" with
anything to do with end-of life...)
Thanks!
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]