Sycosis & Common Gonorrhea 1

[David Little]

My respect colleague Dr. Ardavan and others,

Hahnemann was looking at mixed cases much of the time and noted
together several symptoms caused by differing venereal agents. He did not
have blood tests to make a differential diagnosis. It does not seem what
Hahnemann called "sycosis" is HPV alone. It is more complicated than that
and may not be based only on one single infection. I already noted the HPV
factor many years ago and studied the situation quite closely. IMO, the
answer lies in a common terrain, similar susceptibility factors and
spectrums of related microorganisms not a single vector. I will explain
this view as I progress through your post.
I have a different view of this material. There are several self
limiting subacute infections that produce a urethral discharge.
Nevertheless. there is NO doubt that suppressed gonorrhea Nessieria DOES
produce a well documented set of chronic symptoms. I and many others over
the last 150 years have charted the suppression of gonorrhea N followed by
memory loss, fishy smells, yellow-green to brown smelly catarrhs, dark
patches with hair, the arthritic and rheumatic pains as well as tendency
to overgrowth and flecks, moles and warts. We have given anti-sycotic
remedies and seen the symptoms reverse and the warts fall off, the dark
spot fade, fishy smells disappear, the yellowish green catarrh cease and
THEN the old suppressed discharge came back! After this the patients
completely recover! The reversal of the chronic symptoms and the return of
the originally suppressed gonorrhea N discharge cannot be calledc a "mistake".
Sycosis, like psora, may not related only to one particular causal
element. Hahnemann spoke of several agents that could transmit psora
included mites (scabies), bacteria (leprosy, pimples, boil, erysipelas,
fungi (ringworm, tinea) and viruses (herpes). When ringworm is complicated
by bacteria infection it is still "psora". This means psora is not one
infective agent, but rather, a spectrum of related agents that have share
similar susceptibility and pathways of disease and produce a homogeneous
constitutional syndrome when suppressed. It appears to be the same with
sycosis. It may not be a case of "either or" but "more and many".
Hahnemann promised Boenninghausen that he was writing up a detail list
of the symptoms of sycosis as he had done with psora. Unfortunately, he did
not finish the project and his notes have never been found. So we don't
really know what he thought by 1843. There are many acute infections that
can cause local irritation of the urethra but gonorrhea N is not self
limiting. It can cause will cause gleet for years and years if unresolved
and is known for constitutional sequels. To think Neisserain gonorrhea is a
acute local disease is a mistake. 1000s of homoeopathic case histories have
proved otherwise! I have many cases histories that show otherwise.
In 1828 Hahnemann mixed up symptoms of TB and psora and his description
of "figwarts" ARE NOT a description of the warts caused by HPV. They are a
perfect description of the lesions called Condylomata Lata, which are
caused by the gummata of syphilis! Hahnemann mix the condylomata lata of
syphilis with condylomata accuminata (HPV) and gonorrhea N! He was looking
at some mixed cases of VD. What Hahnemann wrote was only the beginning but
it was a great beginning because he opened the door. It was the later
generations that clearly separated the symptoms of the TB miasm from psora
and the symptoms of sycosis from syphilis.
Condyloma acuminata are regular "warts" Figwarts are condylomata lata,
which is caused by syphilis. Some of Hahnemann's patients suffered both
sycosis and syphilis. Now, I believe that sycosis, like psora, includes a
*spectrum* of related infections that produce the entire syndrome we now
call "sycosis". This syndrome may include gonorrhea N, HPV and HSV-2 and
possibly some other agents. There are just too many case records that show
this range of infections coming together in sycosis.
Hahnemann treated obvious infections of gonorrheal N infections with
Thuja! I have read the cases in the Paris casebooks. These particular cases
did NOT have HPV warts! His own cases show he included that gonorrhea N was
part of sycosis! His observations sycosis included several vectors of
venereal diseases not just HPV. These infections come together because they
thrive in the terrain we call sycosis! Best for man not to separate too
quickly what Nature has brought together. We best look at the bigger
picture through the collective study of thechronic symptoms in many patients.

Hering wrote that we may have to speak of subspecies of psora, because
it is transmitted by mites, bacteria, fungi and viruses. Nevertheless, they
are all still Psora and produce a homogeneous syndrome when suppressed. I
call these Psora 1, 2, 3, and 4, when referring to primary infections. I
have even noted some variations on the psora theme in 1, 2, 3 and 4
patients. We may have to the same thing with sycosis but it is still
sycosis because all these agents come together because they share a related
spectrum and piggyback one upon the another. They seem to produce a
homogeneous chronic syndrome we now called "sycosis" when suppressed.

I have seen the same sycotic symptoms in our books appear after the
suppression of genital chlamydia and trichinoses also! These patients
suffered the same loss of memory, confusion, pains in joints, pain in
muscles, bad smells, foul mucus discharges, etc. And yes, the suppressed
discharges have returned on anti-sycotic remedies. It is quite possible
that we are dealing with a spectrum of microorganisms that share a similar
terrain susceptibility and pathway of disease. Traditional Homoeopathy has
documented the effects of a wide variety of non syphilitic venereal agents
that cause a particular syndrome we know by the symptoms of "sycosis".
Homeopaths have proved over the last 150 years that gonorrhea N causes
a constitutional disorder, especially when suppressed. It is well
documented in books that suppressed gonorrhea N can cause chronic
diseases Under treatment the symptoms of loss of memory, dark hairy
patches, fishy smells, yellow and yellow green to brown foul discharges,
joint and muscle pains, many different types of growths, etc, have been
reversed and in many cases the old suppressed gonorrheal discharge came
back. We can not ignore all the testimonies about the return of the old
discharges by Kent, J.H. Allen, Banerji, and others. I have seen this also!

The proof is in the reversal of symptoms and the return of the
gonorrheal discharge followed by a permanent return of health! This has
been a great boon to 1000s of patients who suffered from chronic symptoms
after the suppression of gonorrhea N! These cases are too well documented
to called a "mistake". To think gonorrhea N is a acute disease is a bigger
mistake! The gonorrhea miasm is a chronic disease on its own merits with or
with or without HPV. This is a proven fact!

I have also seen similar symptoms of sycosis produced when HPV warts
have been removed by allopathy! The spine aches the muscles pain and the
foul smells appear! We must look at the whole terrain and collective signs
and symptoms not just one single agent or another like orthodox medicine.
Gonorrhea, HPV, and several other agents may be involve in sycosis just
like mites, bacteria, fungi and viruses are involved in Psora. The common
factors are a similar terrain, similar susceptibility, a similar pathway of
disease and a homogeneous group of symptoms.
Hahnemann said the *suppression* of venereal disease causes latent
psora to flare up and complicated the case. This flare up needs to calmed
because it became the active layer and then the VD addressed. This does not
mean, however, that all the damage seen caused by gonorrhea N is psora!
That is jumping to a rather large conclusion. First of all, many cases that
progress to gonococci arthritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and
septicemia, etc., have NOT been treated! Therefore, they were not
suppressed so psora could not arise. Therefore psora is not the cause of
the pathology in these cases. Please, let us not underestimate the disease
power of the gonorrhea miasm in its own right whether one calls it sycosis
or not! Hahnemann cases of gonorrhea N show that he did not always treat
psora first. It all depended on the time can circumstances.

To think that gonorrhea N cannot cause a chronic disease is not true.
There are too many cured cases of arthritis, rheumatism, fishy smells, dark
hairy spots, kidney stones, skin growths and tags that ENDED in a return of
the original suppressed discharge! They did not resolve with the return of
an "itch". The were solved with the return of the "drip". This shows Causa.
In many of these cases the person developed moles, flecks, warts and other
growths AFTER suffering gonorrhea N. They were removed along with the rest
of the problems as the symptoms reversed! This happens because the sycotic
terrain is removed.
The term "sycosis" has evolved with the clinic experience gathered by
homoeopaths like Boenninghausen, Kent, J. H. Allen, Banerji, Dhawale, etc.,
over the last 150 years. We know what symptoms are associated with chronic
sycosis. Although it might not be the perfect name (figwarts are
syphilitic) - the symptoms are well documented. To make new terms or change
the definition would cause more confusion than good. What was named
mistakenly in the beginning has proved to be of great clinical value in the
end! I believe we need to make corrections and clarifications as well as
include subspecies of sycosis as we have done with psora on Hering's
suggestion.

The reasons I say this is that there are TOO MANY documented chronic
disease associated with traditional sycosis that are based on the
suppression of gonorrhea N. Too many times remedies like Thuja, Natrum
Sulph and Medorrhinum have brought back the old suppressed gonorrheal
discharges with a permanent removed of the sycotic symptoms. I have such
cases myself and it is not possible to tell me gonorrhea N can not cause
chronic symptoms associated with sycosis in our books! I have seen the
original suppressed discharges come back with the return of health!

It is already known that Hahnemann mixed up the condymata lata of
syphilis and condylomata accuminata (HPV) and misnamed non syphilitic VD
"sycosis". As Hering said we must all go further than Hahnemann and correct
the errors of the past. This error has already been corrected by
generations of homoeopaths! Hahnemann's Paris casebooks also show that he
was treating gonorrhea N with Thuja and anti-sycotic remedies. There is not
doubt that several non syphilitic venereal diseases are part of the overall
syndrome called "sycosis". They all lead to a similar syndrome when
suppressed because they share a similar terrain, disease pathways, and
chronic symptoms.

The group case based on a study of 100s suffering from suppressed
gonorrhea N shows that it produces a constitutional state with a well
documented group of symptoms and disease states. There are many cases that
show that after the suppression of gonorrhea N. there was loss of memory,
the development of yellow greenish catarrhs, fishy smells, joint and muscle
pains, heart disease, the growth of fatty tumors, flecks and warts, etc.
Such symptoms have appeared after the suppressions of other non syphilitic
venereal diseases including chlamydia, trichinosis, and HPV.

I think to say sycosis as we know it is a total "mistake" is to throw
out the baby (150 years of clinical experience confirmed by the reversal of
symptoms) with the bath water (Hahnemann confusing mixed cases of sycosis
and syphilis). There are many cases that show a host of chronic problems
started with suppressed gonorrhea N (arthritis, heart disease, asthma,
fatty tumor, kidney stones, skin growths, etc) and end when the old,
suppressed gonorrheal discharge returned. Some of this may be discovering
by accident but it is no "mistake". No one should under estimate gonorrhea
N as a chronic miasma.

I have seen the return of the original discharge even 25 years after
the suppression of gonorrhea N! One just cannot ignore the appearance of
this smelly suppressed discharge! The medicine of experience shows the
suppression of gonorrhea N, HPV, and other non syphilitic venereal
infections may cause the syndrome named (rightly or wrongly) "sycosis".
Yes, we have some sorting and updating to do but I do not think the last
150 years of clinical experience can be ignored just because we now
understand that gonorrhea N, HPV, HSV-2, chlamydia, trichinoses are
different microorganisms. Why? Because sycosis is a *terrain* that may
involve a spectrum of microorganisms that share a similar susceptibility,
venereal pathway and symptoms just like psora involves mites, bacteria and
fungi that affect the skin. We must look at the bigger picture in living
human beings by the group anamnesis and clinical experiences such as the
reversal of symptoms not just modern pathology books.

Sincerely, David Little

---------------
"It is the life-force which cures diseases because a dead man needs no more
medicines."

Samuel Hahnemann

Visit our website on Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Cyberspace Homoeopathic
Academy at
http://www.simillimum.com
David Little © 2000

[David Little]

My respect colleague Dr. Ardavan and others,

Hahnemann was looking at mixed cases much of the time and noted
together several symptoms caused by differing venereal agents. He did not
have blood tests to make a differential diagnosis. It does not seem what
Hahnemann called "sycosis" is HPV alone. It is more complicated than that
and may not be based only on one single infection. I already noted the HPV
factor many years ago and studied the situation quite closely. IMO, the
answer lies in a common terrain, similar susceptibility factors and
spectrums of related microorganisms not a single vector. I will explain
this view as I progress through your post.
I have a different view of this material. There are several self
limiting subacute infections that produce a urethral discharge.
Nevertheless. there is NO doubt that suppressed gonorrhea Nessieria DOES
produce a well documented set of chronic symptoms. I and many others over
the last 150 years have charted the suppression of gonorrhea N followed by
memory loss, fishy smells, yellow-green to brown smelly catarrhs, dark
patches with hair, the arthritic and rheumatic pains as well as tendency
to overgrowth and flecks, moles and warts. We have given anti-sycotic
remedies and seen the symptoms reverse and the warts fall off, the dark
spot fade, fishy smells disappear, the yellowish green catarrh cease and
THEN the old suppressed discharge came back! After this the patients
completely recover! The reversal of the chronic symptoms and the return of
the originally suppressed gonorrhea N discharge cannot be calledc a "mistake".
Sycosis, like psora, may not related only to one particular causal
element. Hahnemann spoke of several agents that could transmit psora
included mites (scabies), bacteria (leprosy, pimples, boil, erysipelas,
fungi (ringworm, tinea) and viruses (herpes). When ringworm is complicated
by bacteria infection it is still "psora". This means psora is not one
infective agent, but rather, a spectrum of related agents that have share
similar susceptibility and pathways of disease and produce a homogeneous
constitutional syndrome when suppressed. It appears to be the same with
sycosis. It may not be a case of "either or" but "more and many".
Hahnemann promised Boenninghausen that he was writing up a detail list
of the symptoms of sycosis as he had done with psora. Unfortunately, he did
not finish the project and his notes have never been found. So we don't
really know what he thought by 1843. There are many acute infections that
can cause local irritation of the urethra but gonorrhea N is not self
limiting. It can cause will cause gleet for years and years if unresolved
and is known for constitutional sequels. To think Neisserain gonorrhea is a
acute local disease is a mistake. 1000s of homoeopathic case histories have
proved otherwise! I have many cases histories that show otherwise.
In 1828 Hahnemann mixed up symptoms of TB and psora and his description
of "figwarts" ARE NOT a description of the warts caused by HPV. They are a
perfect description of the lesions called Condylomata Lata, which are
caused by the gummata of syphilis! Hahnemann mix the condylomata lata of
syphilis with condylomata accuminata (HPV) and gonorrhea N! He was looking
at some mixed cases of VD. What Hahnemann wrote was only the beginning but
it was a great beginning because he opened the door. It was the later
generations that clearly separated the symptoms of the TB miasm from psora
and the symptoms of sycosis from syphilis.
Condyloma acuminata are regular "warts" Figwarts are condylomata lata,
which is caused by syphilis. Some of Hahnemann's patients suffered both
sycosis and syphilis. Now, I believe that sycosis, like psora, includes a
*spectrum* of related infections that produce the entire syndrome we now
call "sycosis". This syndrome may include gonorrhea N, HPV and HSV-2 and
possibly some other agents. There are just too many case records that show
this range of infections coming together in sycosis.
Hahnemann treated obvious infections of gonorrheal N infections with
Thuja! I have read the cases in the Paris casebooks. These particular cases
did NOT have HPV warts! His own cases show he included that gonorrhea N was
part of sycosis! His observations sycosis included several vectors of
venereal diseases not just HPV. These infections come together because they
thrive in the terrain we call sycosis! Best for man not to separate too
quickly what Nature has brought together. We best look at the bigger
picture through the collective study of thechronic symptoms in many patients.

Hering wrote that we may have to speak of subspecies of psora, because
it is transmitted by mites, bacteria, fungi and viruses. Nevertheless, they
are all still Psora and produce a homogeneous syndrome when suppressed. I
call these Psora 1, 2, 3, and 4, when referring to primary infections. I
have even noted some variations on the psora theme in 1, 2, 3 and 4
patients. We may have to the same thing with sycosis but it is still
sycosis because all these agents come together because they share a related
spectrum and piggyback one upon the another. They seem to produce a
homogeneous chronic syndrome we now called "sycosis" when suppressed.

I have seen the same sycotic symptoms in our books appear after the
suppression of genital chlamydia and trichinoses also! These patients
suffered the same loss of memory, confusion, pains in joints, pain in
muscles, bad smells, foul mucus discharges, etc. And yes, the suppressed
discharges have returned on anti-sycotic remedies. It is quite possible
that we are dealing with a spectrum of microorganisms that share a similar
terrain susceptibility and pathway of disease. Traditional Homoeopathy has
documented the effects of a wide variety of non syphilitic venereal agents
that cause a particular syndrome we know by the symptoms of "sycosis".
Homeopaths have proved over the last 150 years that gonorrhea N causes
a constitutional disorder, especially when suppressed. It is well
documented in books that suppressed gonorrhea N can cause chronic
diseases Under treatment the symptoms of loss of memory, dark hairy
patches, fishy smells, yellow and yellow green to brown foul discharges,
joint and muscle pains, many different types of growths, etc, have been
reversed and in many cases the old suppressed gonorrheal discharge came
back. We can not ignore all the testimonies about the return of the old
discharges by Kent, J.H. Allen, Banerji, and others. I have seen this also!

The proof is in the reversal of symptoms and the return of the
gonorrheal discharge followed by a permanent return of health! This has
been a great boon to 1000s of patients who suffered from chronic symptoms
after the suppression of gonorrhea N! These cases are too well documented
to called a "mistake". To think gonorrhea N is a acute disease is a bigger
mistake! The gonorrhea miasm is a chronic disease on its own merits with or
with or without HPV. This is a proven fact!

I have also seen similar symptoms of sycosis produced when HPV warts
have been removed by allopathy! The spine aches the muscles pain and the
foul smells appear! We must look at the whole terrain and collective signs
and symptoms not just one single agent or another like orthodox medicine.
Gonorrhea, HPV, and several other agents may be involve in sycosis just
like mites, bacteria, fungi and viruses are involved in Psora. The common
factors are a similar terrain, similar susceptibility, a similar pathway of
disease and a homogeneous group of symptoms.
Hahnemann said the *suppression* of venereal disease causes latent
psora to flare up and complicated the case. This flare up needs to calmed
because it became the active layer and then the VD addressed. This does not
mean, however, that all the damage seen caused by gonorrhea N is psora!
That is jumping to a rather large conclusion. First of all, many cases that
progress to gonococci arthritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and
septicemia, etc., have NOT been treated! Therefore, they were not
suppressed so psora could not arise. Therefore psora is not the cause of
the pathology in these cases. Please, let us not underestimate the disease
power of the gonorrhea miasm in its own right whether one calls it sycosis
or not! Hahnemann cases of gonorrhea N show that he did not always treat
psora first. It all depended on the time can circumstances.

To think that gonorrhea N cannot cause a chronic disease is not true.
There are too many cured cases of arthritis, rheumatism, fishy smells, dark
hairy spots, kidney stones, skin growths and tags that ENDED in a return of
the original suppressed discharge! They did not resolve with the return of
an "itch". The were solved with the return of the "drip". This shows Causa.
In many of these cases the person developed moles, flecks, warts and other
growths AFTER suffering gonorrhea N. They were removed along with the rest
of the problems as the symptoms reversed! This happens because the sycotic
terrain is removed.
The term "sycosis" has evolved with the clinic experience gathered by
homoeopaths like Boenninghausen, Kent, J. H. Allen, Banerji, Dhawale, etc.,
over the last 150 years. We know what symptoms are associated with chronic
sycosis. Although it might not be the perfect name (figwarts are
syphilitic) - the symptoms are well documented. To make new terms or change
the definition would cause more confusion than good. What was named
mistakenly in the beginning has proved to be of great clinical value in the
end! I believe we need to make corrections and clarifications as well as
include subspecies of sycosis as we have done with psora on Hering's
suggestion.

The reasons I say this is that there are TOO MANY documented chronic
disease associated with traditional sycosis that are based on the
suppression of gonorrhea N. Too many times remedies like Thuja, Natrum
Sulph and Medorrhinum have brought back the old suppressed gonorrheal
discharges with a permanent removed of the sycotic symptoms. I have such
cases myself and it is not possible to tell me gonorrhea N can not cause
chronic symptoms associated with sycosis in our books! I have seen the
original suppressed discharges come back with the return of health!

It is already known that Hahnemann mixed up the condymata lata of
syphilis and condylomata accuminata (HPV) and misnamed non syphilitic VD
"sycosis". As Hering said we must all go further than Hahnemann and correct
the errors of the past. This error has already been corrected by
generations of homoeopaths! Hahnemann's Paris casebooks also show that he
was treating gonorrhea N with Thuja and anti-sycotic remedies. There is not
doubt that several non syphilitic venereal diseases are part of the overall
syndrome called "sycosis". They all lead to a similar syndrome when
suppressed because they share a similar terrain, disease pathways, and
chronic symptoms.

The group case based on a study of 100s suffering from suppressed
gonorrhea N shows that it produces a constitutional state with a well
documented group of symptoms and disease states. There are many cases that
show that after the suppression of gonorrhea N. there was loss of memory,
the development of yellow greenish catarrhs, fishy smells, joint and muscle
pains, heart disease, the growth of fatty tumors, flecks and warts, etc.
Such symptoms have appeared after the suppressions of other non syphilitic
venereal diseases including chlamydia, trichinosis, and HPV.

I think to say sycosis as we know it is a total "mistake" is to throw
out the baby (150 years of clinical experience confirmed by the reversal of
symptoms) with the bath water (Hahnemann confusing mixed cases of sycosis
and syphilis). There are many cases that show a host of chronic problems
started with suppressed gonorrhea N (arthritis, heart disease, asthma,
fatty tumor, kidney stones, skin growths, etc) and end when the old,
suppressed gonorrheal discharge returned. Some of this may be discovering
by accident but it is no "mistake". No one should under estimate gonorrhea
N as a chronic miasma.

I have seen the return of the original discharge even 25 years after
the suppression of gonorrhea N! One just cannot ignore the appearance of
this smelly suppressed discharge! The medicine of experience shows the
suppression of gonorrhea N, HPV, and other non syphilitic venereal
infections may cause the syndrome named (rightly or wrongly) "sycosis".
Yes, we have some sorting and updating to do but I do not think the last
150 years of clinical experience can be ignored just because we now
understand that gonorrhea N, HPV, HSV-2, chlamydia, trichinoses are
different microorganisms. Why? Because sycosis is a *terrain* that may
involve a spectrum of microorganisms that share a similar susceptibility,
venereal pathway and symptoms just like psora involves mites, bacteria and
fungi that affect the skin. We must look at the bigger picture in living
human beings by the group anamnesis and clinical experiences such as the
reversal of symptoms not just modern pathology books.

Sincerely, David Little

---------------
"It is the life-force which cures diseases because a dead man needs no more
medicines."

Samuel Hahnemann

Visit our website on Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Cyberspace Homoeopathic
Academy at
http://www.simillimum.com
David Little © 2000

[Rochelle Marsden]

I have read all the correspondence on this subject and all I know is that I
have a patient with Genital Warts which are flesh coloured and nothing I
have given him has done anything at all. So therefore if anyone has any
suggestions for this 1 sided case...... The only other thing is that he has
sweaty palms and occasional cold sweats at night and "sticky sperm". I have
tried Thuja up to 1M, Sepia and the last Rx I gave him was Calc. The genital
warts we believe were caught from his asymptomatic wife years ago before
they were married.

Rochelle

Registered Homeopath, EFT(Advanced)Practitioner
www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

[muthu kumar]

Hi Rochelle-
Did you consider Staphysagria-
Has "sticky" seminal emissions and is a warty medicine as well.
Medorrhinum has thick seminal emissions.
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Rochelle Marsden" wrote:
that I
he has
I have
genital

[Joy Lucas]

Kali bich, Nat sulph, Puls and a whole range of others have 'sticky'
discharges. If he only perspires on the palms of the hands that would
be quite unusual - maybe Dulcamara. Joy

http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/provings

[Rochelle Marsden]

No I haven't so I will look that one up. I can think of absolutely no reason
to give him Medorrhinum.

Thanks
Rochelle
Registered Homeopath, EFT(Advanced)Practitioner
www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

[Rochelle Marsden]

The "sticky " sperm is the only sticky discharge he has. As I said it is
really a one sided case with the genital warts as otherwise he is healthy.
Rochelle
Registered Homeopath, EFT(Advanced)Practitioner
www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk