No panic - The truth about bird flu, H5N1, vaccinations and AIDS-Stefan Lanka, Virologist, Part 2 of 3

[Sheri Nakken]

Interview with Stefan Lanka 27.10.2005 on "bird flu" and some related
subjects, Part 2 of 2

22.02.2006

No panic - The truth about bird flu, H5N1, vaccinations and AIDS
In reality, those purported antibodies are soluble blood albumins, which
play a central role in the tightmaking of cells which are growing and
dividing and in the healing of wounds.

These blood albumins, also called globulins, in a test-tube containing
corresponding concentrations of acids and bases, minerals and solvents,
will combine arbitrarily with other albumins. Thus you can make any sample
taken from an animal or a person test arbitrarily positive or negative.
It's complete, and this must be quite clearly said too, criminal, wilfulness.

Also if it is maintained that, by means of a biochemical multiplication
technique called polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the so-called gene
substance of the virus can be multiplied and thus be proven to exist, this
is a swindle, since firstly, there nowhere exists a gene substance of a
diseasecausing virus, to which one might compare the artificially
multiplied particles of gene substance, and secondly, only such parts of
gene substances get multiplied which already existed in beforehand in those
fluids which are being used for indirectly demonstrating the existence of
the purported virus.

And it's quite simple:
A thousand pieces of indirect proof, corn circles for instance, do not make
an UFO either. You don't even have to know English, so as to read those
publications to which the virus swindlers are referring, in order to see
for yourself that nowhere in them does a virus appear: If you ask those
scientists for proof of the existence of the purported viruses, for
instance that of H5N1, you will get only evasions in return and never a
concrete answer.

On TV we have heard time and again that the investigations were carried out
in an English laboratory. The name of that English laboratory the public
has not gotten to know. It's the reference laboratory of the EU for bird
flu, in Weybridge. I have asked the scientists several times for the pieces
of proof of the existence of the H5N1 virus. They have replied to me only
once, and after that never again, and wrote that they did not understand my
question.

To the World Health Organization and in particular to the bird flu pandemic
co-ordinator, the German Klaus Stöhr, I also have written several times and
asked for proof of the existence of the bird flu virus. Neither the WHO nor
Klaus Stöhr has reacted to this.

But what does this H5N1, which makes the whole world tremble, mean?

The "H" in H5N1 stands for haemaglutinin, the "N" stands for neuraminidase.

The pseudovirologists are maintaining that in the protective coat of
influenza viruses, there are albumins of the type haemaglutinin and
albumins of the type of the enzyme neuraminidase.

As haemaglutinin, in biochemistry the most diverse substances are being
referred to, not only albumins, which are causing the red blood-corpuscles
to lump together with each other.

The pseudovirologists have jointly agreed that in the protective coat of
influenza viruses there supposedly are 15 different kinds of albumins
having the property of a haemaglutinin. The "5" here stands for Type Five
of a purported albumin, whose existence, again, is also only being
demonstrated indirectly.

Now in order to prove the existence of an influenza virus, in the
laboratory red blood-corpuscles are mixed with samples in which there
supposedly is the purported virus. If the red blood-corpuscles lump
together, then it is maintained that a haemaglutinin in an influenza virus
must be the cause of this, without there ever having been isolated a virus
from - not to speak of, there ever having been seen a virus in - such a
sample or from/in such a mixture.

then conclude, precisely in the manner of the seers in the cartoon Asterix
and Obelix, which type of haemaglutinin, supposedly, has been found. For
this, these scientists have available a multitude of test procedures, which
by their construction ascertain that precisely that type of haemaglutinin
which the "testing" scientist already has assumed in advance would be
present becomes indicated too.

Precisely the same is the case with the enzyme neuraminidase, which is
maintained to be a component part of the protecting hood of influenza
viruses. Here, 9 different types are being maintained by the
pseudovirologists to exist. In reality the neuraminidase is an enzyme which
by the separating off of parts of an aminosugar called neuramin acid
regulates that surface tension which is decisive for the functioning of the
respective metabolism. Analogously to the "viral" haemaglutinin there is a
multitude of corrupt test procedures which "demonstrate" that result, that
is, "the existence of" precisely that type of neuraminidase, which the
"seeing" virologist already had assumed in advance.

Therefore it is also no wonder that that turkey cock, belonging to the 73
years old farmer Dimitris Kominaris of the East Aegean island Inousses,
which ostensibly died of H5N1, has vanished without a trace, that at the
reference laboratory in question demonstrably no sample from Greece has
arrived either, and that the clairvoyant media however have reported that a
first sample has confirmed the suspicion.

For demonstrating the existence of H5N1, really no sample is necessary
either, since, as is the case with all purported contagious diseases, it is
a question of a planned action, intended for political reasons to induce fear.

In the media, photos of bird flu viruses and influenxa viruses constantly
are being shown. Some of these photos show round formations. Are those not
viruses?

No! Firstly, those round formations which supposedly are influenza viruses
are, as every molecular-biologist can see, artificially produced
particles consisting of fats and albumins. The layman can check on this by
asking for a scientific publication in which these pictures are reproduced
and described and the composition of the formations shown is documented.
Such a publication does not exist.

Secondly, those pictures which supposedly show bird flu viruses in reality
show, as every biologist can make out without any doubt about it, quite
normal component parts of cells, or even show complete cells which happen
to be in the process of exporting or importing cell and metabolism
component parts. Again, the layman can check on this very precisely, by
asking for those publications on which those photos are based and from
which they originate: He will never receive such publications. The
scaremongerers' craftguild is loth to expose its trade basis, the swindles
with laboratory and animal experiments.

If you ask the picture agencies or a news agency such as the dpa from where
they are getting these photos of theirs, then they will refer you to the
American contagious-disease authority the CDC of the Pentagon. >From this
CDC it is that the only photo of the purported H5N1 originates too.

This photo shows the length section cut and also the cross section cut of
tubes in cells which have been caused to die in a test-tube. These small
tubes in the professional language are called microtubuli, and serve the
transport and communication in the cell and in the process of cell division.

It has been demonstrated however that H5N1 kills hen embryos and can be
cultivated in eggs. Where is the rat to be smelled in this?

These experiments have been used already since over 100 years back, in
order to "prove" the existence of several "viruses" quite different from
each other, for instance also that of the purported smallpox virus. In
these experiments, extracts are being injected through the eggshell into
the embryo. Depending on how much is injected and where in the embryo the
supposedly "virus-infected" extract is injected, the embryo dies faster or
more slowly. It would die from such injections in precisely the same manner
too if the extracts were sterlilized in advance.

This killing then is presented by those virologists, firstly, as direct
proof of the existence of the respective virus, secondly as proof of the
possibility of multiplying the virus, and thirdly and simultaneously as
proof of the isolation of the virus.

each year at the vaccine manufacturers', various vaccine substances are
being produced.

Besides hen embryos, also cells are being killed in test-tubes in order to
present the dying of these cells as proof of the existence, the multiplying
and the isolation of a diseasecausing virus.

Nowhere however is a virus being isolated in this manner, photographed in
an electrone microscope and its component parts described in processes of
the type called electrophoresis.

But then what does kill the animals in the animal experiments, if it is not
the H5N1?

Concerning this too you only have to take a look at the publications in
which these animal experiments are described. Hens are being slowly
suffocated to death within three days by means of administering a fluid to
them through the windpipe tube.

In small Java monkeys, 30 days before the purported infection temperature
transmitters are being placed in the abdomen, 5 days before the purported
infection they are fixated in an air sub-pressure chamber and at the point
of the so-called infection, an amount of liquid corresponding to 6 schnaps
glasses for humans is pressed through the tube in the windpipe of these
young animals. Parts of the same extract from dying, that is putrifying,
cells are sprayed into both eyes and into the tonsils of the animals. In
many cases, suffocation attacks are caused in the animals by means of
rinsing the bronchial tubes, etc. The resulting damage and destruction is
then presented as the result of H5N1.

I have informed the earlier Minister for Consumer Protection, Künast, and
the present minister, Trittin, who are presenting themselves as protectors
of animals, about this, via their personal reporters. There was no reaction.

But the virus of the Spanish flu has been reconstructed genetically and
also has been demonstrated to be a bird flu virus!

What, so to speak, was reconstructed genetically is nothing else than a
model of the genetic substance of an influenza virus. An influenza virus
has never been isolated. A genetic substance of an influenza virus has
never been isolated either. All that has been done is multiplying gene
substance by means of the biochemical multiplication method "poliymerase
chain reaction". With this method it also is possible to multiply
arbitrarily new, never earlier existing, short pieces of gene substance.

Thus it's possible with this technique also to manipulate the genetic
fingerprint, that is, to test someone as identical to or different from a
sample that has been "found". Only if very much of gene substance that can
be compared is found will the genetic fingerprint, provided the process is
carried out properly, provide a certain probability of a match.

Dr Jeffery Taubenberger, from whom the allegation of a reconstruction of
the 1918 pandemic virus originates, works for the US-American army and has
worked for more than 10 years on producing, on the basis of samples from
different human corpses, short pieces of gene substance by means of the
biochemical multiplication technique PCR. Out of the multitude of produced
pieces he has selected those which came closest to the model of the genetic
substance of the idea of an influenza virus, and has published these.

In no corpse however was a virus seen or isolated or was a piece of gene
substance from a such isolated. By means of the PCR technique there were
produced out of nothing pieces of gene substance whose earlier existence in
the corpse could not be demonstrated.

If viruses had been present, then these could have been isolated, and out
of them their gene substance could have been isolated too; there would have
been no necessity for anyone to produce laboriously, by means of PCR
technique - with clearly a swindle intention - a patchwork quilt of a model
of the genetic substance of the idea of an influenza virus.

How can a layman check on this?

About these short pieces of gene substance, which in the sense of genetics
are not complete and which do not even suffice for defining a gene, it is
being maintained that they together would make up the entire gene substance
of an influenza virus.

In order to see through this swindle one only has to be able to add up the
published length pieces, in order to ascertain that the sum of the lengths
of the individual pieces, which supposedly makes up the entire viral gene
substance of the purported influenza virus, does not make up the length of
the idea of the genome of the influenza virus model.

Even simpler it is to ask in what publication you can find the electrone
microscope photo of this supposedly reconstructed virus. There is no such
publication.

It's being maintained that these experiments have demonstrated that this
reconstructed virus from 1918 would kill very effectively. What might be
untrue in this?

If I inject into a hen embryo a mixture of artificially-produced pieces of
gene substance and albumins and aim at the centre of its heart, then it
dies faster than if I only inject the mixture into the embryo peripherically.

If I expose cells in a test-tube to a quantity of artificially-produced
gene substance and albumins, then they die faster than under the standard
conditions for cells' dying in a test-tube, something which "normally" is
being presented as proof of the existence, as proof of the isolation and as
proof of the multiplication of the purported virus.

Based on this artificially produced gene substance, which is presented as
viral, models of albumins are being made with computers. Procceding from
these albumin models, the appearance of the entire virus is reconstructed
with computers.

That is all, but the whole world believes that you can reconstruct viruses
in laboratories. Thus it's no wonder either that, referring to statements
by the CIA and by the British secret service MI6, it is being maintained
that in North Korea, the communist regime would now be producing flu
viruses even more deadly than H5N1.

What conclusions do you draw from this?

Since the head of the supposed al-Qaida, Bin Laden, has not been found,
al-Qaida in Arabic only means The Road and nothing had been heard of this
organization before the hotcleaning-up of the collapse-endangered
skyscrapers in New York, since, just as the supposed smallpox viruses have
not been found, there were not found any mass destruction weapons of
Saddam's, which were the reason for the second Iraq war, and now once more
some deadly viruses are being maintained to exist, it should be obvious who
in reality are the terrorists and who in reality are the suicide bombers:
All who are participating in the virus panic and are contributing to it!

In the pandemic plans a possible breakdown of the provisioning and of
public order, in connection with the declaring of a bird flu pandemic, has
been envisaged by the WHO. The estimates of up to 100 million deaths should
be taken seriously.

As being under threat I see all inhabitants of homes for the aged, who in a
breaking-out of chaos and a breakdown of the provisioning systems, and with
those the public order, will be the first, and besides small children the
most protectionless and defenceless, victims. Hardly possble to depict
would it be, if the contagious-disease makers would declare the emergency
already during the winter.

Does then the substance Tamiflu, which is now being purchased with tax
money and stocked, protect people from the bird flu?

That this substance protects against a flu nobody is maintaining.

Tamiflu is supposed to function as a neuraminidase-restraining agent. It
restrains in an organism the function of the sugar neuraminidase acid,
which is co-responsible for the surface tension in the cells.

Those side effects which are noted on the instruction slips accompanying
packages of Tamiflu are almost identical to the symptoms of a serious
influenza. On a large scale, thus, medicines are now being stored which
cause precisely the same symptoms as those which appear in an actual
so-called influenza - and which will discontinue, with a doctor, after
seven days, and without a doctor after a week.

If Tamiflu is administered to sick persons, then this is likely to cause
far more serious symptoms than those of a serious influenza. If a pandemic
is stated to exist, then many people will take this medicine at the same
time. In that case we will actually have unequivocal symptoms of a Tamiflu
epidemic. Then also deaths caused by Tamiflu are to be expected, and this
will then be presented as evidence of the dangerous nature of the bird flu
and evidence of how anxious is the state that people should be in good health.

In this, the well-tested AIDS pattern is being repeated. In Spain it's
noted on the instruction slips accompanying packages of AIDS medicine that
it is not known whether the symptoms are caused by the medicine or by the
virus.

Then you will also not recommend any general vaccination or the specially
developed vaccination against the bird flu?

I am not recommending any madness.

Every vaccination substance contains poisonous substances which have
effects during a long time resulting in smaller or larger permanent injury.
The infection protection law requires, as necessary precondition for a
vaccination's being justified, the "is", the fact of there existing
something which causes a disease, for instance a virus.

Since none of the so-called diseasecausing viruses can be, nor should be,
maintained to exist, there can also be no lawful vaccinations against
influenza, and none against bird flu either.

Every vaccination which has occurred in Germany after the infection
protection law became operative on 01.01.2000 is a crime of serious bodily
assault. Of course I am not recommending people to surrender themselves to
become victims of lawbreakings and crimes.