Bird Flu - Scare Scenario

[Sheri Nakken]

Bird Flu - Scare Scenario

Of course, I know vaccines don't work so don't agree with the vaccine
statement, but the essence of this is good. Also those treated
homeopathically fared much better.

"In the case of bird flu, direct comparisons to the scourge of 1918 may
well be overblown. Many people died of pneumonia during that outbreak of
the Spanish flu because there were no antibiotics to treat it. There were
also no vaccines, no antivirals and little in the way of public health or
the sanitary conditions Americans take for granted today. We also have our
top scientists and epidemiologists tracking this avian flu, which was not
the case in 1918 prior to the essential mutation."

Sheri

The Nation

This article can be found on the web at
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051107/bird_flu_scare

Scare Scenario

by DR. MARC SIEGEL

[posted online on October 24, 2005]
When I see the posters for the soon-to-be released Chicken Little movie, I
have to wonder what the lead character would have to say about the current
bird flu craze. Would he say the sky is about to fall on him? Or would he
come to his senses and understand that even as an American chicken, he is
more likely to be killed by panic than by the flu?

The American public is profiting the least from the ongoing hysteria
surrounding avian influenza. The drug manufacturer Roche is suddenly in
great demand for its antiviral drug Tamiflu, which has only been tested
against bird flu in the test tube and has no current use, because the virus
has not mutated to a form that can easily be transmitted among humans. A
common misconception--that Tamiflu is some kind of a bird flu vaccine
rather than an antiviral that at best decreases symptoms of infection--has
led to a lot of impulse buying. As with the antibiotic Cipro, prescribed to
treat anthrax back in 2001, Tamiflu is becoming a treatment for the fear of
a virus rather than the virus itself.

Another main profiteer of the bird flu panic is our federal government.
Driven to avoid another disaster debacle like Hurricane Katrina, the Bush
Administration is galloping to the rescue in advance of anything happening.
The President's recent suggestion that he might use the military to control
an influenza pandemic reminds us how quickly civil liberties can be
sacrificed in an emergency. But more than that, it is a hysterical
suggestion. Pandemics infiltrate a community person by person. A show of
military force would likely cause a panic that would spread a virus more
quickly.

CONTINUED BELOW
Most bird flus don't mutate sufficiently to pass to humans. And those that
do are usually responsible for our yearly influenza outbreak. On the
average of three times per century, a mutated avian influenza is a bad
enough bug to cause a pandemic. The bird flu of current concern, A(H5N1),
is a big killer among birds but is still several mutations away from being
able to routinely infect us. The estimated sixty-five people who have died
of it over the past two years did so because of their close and repeated
contact with birds, not because of casual contact. Cooking a chicken kills
the influenza virus.

So why all the panic over a potential threat? In part the public hysteria
is due to the fact that basic information about this potential pandemic has
been misconstrued or ignored about this potential pandemic, much in the way
previous health threats in the news--anthrax, smallpox, West Nile virus,
mad cow disease--were all magnified beyond their ability to do great harm.

In each case there is a doomsday scenario that is packaged and sold to the
public by the media, which consequently makes some undeserving manufacturer
rich or collects votes for an undeserving leader.

In the case of bird flu, direct comparisons to the scourge of 1918 may well
be overblown. Many people died of pneumonia during that outbreak of the
Spanish flu because there were no antibiotics to treat it. There were also
no vaccines, no antivirals and little in the way of public health or the
sanitary conditions Americans take for granted today. We also have our top
scientists and epidemiologists tracking this avian flu, which was not the
case in 1918 prior to the essential mutation.

Fear leads to a diversion of resources; our fear of bird flu is being
translated into a proposal for massive stockpiles of perishable drugs and
vaccines. Congress could calmly and rationally designate funds to upgrade
our flu vaccine manufacturing capacity using the genetic technology we
already use routinely for other vaccines. Instead, our government allows
pharmaceutical companies to use an outdated chicken-egg medium that
requires three to six months to develop a vaccine against a particular
strain. This slow process is then a justification for panicked stockpiles.

Bird flu is better studied in the laboratory than in a news conference.
This virus deserves public attention only insomuch as it motivates our
government to improve emergency services while bringing methods of vaccine
manufacturing into the twenty-first century.

Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!

If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.