On one person I've had 30c aggravate badly (but some curative action)
whereas 200c aggravated only slightly, with much better curative
action, and 10M did the best of all--terrific action and no aggravation
whatever.
He's the only person I've seen that in, but I was taught that you can
get aggravation from going too *low* as well as too high, because (so
to speak) the body can "hear" the remedy and is *trying* to follow, but
the remedy isn't "speaking" clearly enough, so the body gets as if
irritated, and can't quite do what's needed; but higher, more specific
potency will do the job.
With repeating doses (6c, 12, or LM) I've had good results with having
the person notice what improves after the dose, identifying what gets
better and worse *first* as the picture starts to change, and key the
repetition schedule to that. If the remedy's acting curatively they'll
need less frequent doses over time, so could *either* re-dose only as
sxs start to return, *or* see how long a period that is, and time the
repeat for just before they would begin to.
Maybe this is a situation where EFT could help the reaction pass off
faster, and give him a sense of control over it? (www.emofree.com)
Maybe... Yet it might not be realistic to assume we can *always* get a
perfect match, and we don't usually *need* a perfect match to cure, or
at least to move things along.

think that "no aggravations" might be unrealistic.
Yet I've had the impression that most people's experiences are more
similar to mine with aggravations--that they are actually pretty rare.
If you're seeing a lot of them, it would be interesting to figure out
why. ?
Yes!!!
Yes, definitely! That would be called "clarifying the case", as
Hahnemann talks about in "one-sided cases" which, as he notes, are
often not *truly* one-sided, but case-taking wasn't complete enough to
bring out the rest of what *was* there to prescribe on, and a "sorta
close" remedy can sometimes emphasize the parts of the case that we
need to make better use of for prescribing.
Then you need to sort out whether it is "clarifying", or whether there
are proving sxs mixed in too. This might be a time where moving to
single doses of higher potencies; 30 or 200 are also considered good
"learning" potencies, at least that's how I was taught.
Best wishes,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]