Aesculus

[tjelie]

Hi all

In Vermeulen's synoptic I find sensation of paralysis of muscles of
back, but I cannot find the right rubric in the repertory.
Does anyone know where I can find that.

Thanks in advance,
Annemieke

[Joy Lucas]

Dear Annemieke, as you know Aesculus has an affinity to the sacro-iliac
and you will find this rx in many references to this area, also this rx
is about stasis = paralysis and this can occur almost anywhere in the
body but from a rubric point of view you could use the rubric 'Pelvis,
lameness' to be the most applicable. Hope useful, best wishes, Joy

http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.blogspot.com
http://homepage.mac.com/joylucas/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Robyn]

Would this be it?

Synthesis

BACK - PARALYSIS - Spine
AESC. cocc. con. Irid-met. phos. plb-i. plect. sec. Stry.

Aesc. references are kent, Phatak, and Tyler

and it can be found in:
BACK - PARALYSIS - Spine
GENERALITIES - PARALYSIS - sensation of
GENERALITIES - PARALYSIS - sensation of - lower part

But, in Murphy:

Back - PARALYSIS, muscles of back - paralysis, spine - sensation of, muscles
AESC.mp1

Back - PARALYSIS, muscles of back - paralysis, spine
AESC.mp1 caust.mp1 con.mp1 lath.mp1 plb.mp1 xan.mp1

Maybe this is where Vermeulen found it. And as we know, Murphy does not
include references. or maybe Murphy go it from Vermeulen?

Best

Robyn

"The fact is we need any and every way of finding the right remedy; the
simple simile, the simple symptomatic similimum and the farthest reach of
all - the pathologic similimum, and I maintain that we are still well within
the lines of Homoeopathy that is expansive, progressive, science fostered
and science fostering." (Dr. J. Compton Burnett)

[tjelie]

Thanks Joy and Robyn

muscles

Robyn I think this is what he was refering to, but indeed it makes you
wonder where it came from in the first place.
And Joy I could not find the rubric 'pelvis lameness' but I did
find 'back lameness' which contains Aesculus.

Thanks again,
Annemieke