Dear,
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
theoretical discussion
-
H. Balasubramanian
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: theoretical discussion
Dear,
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
H. Balasubramanian
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: theoretical discussion
Dear,
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
H. Balasubramanian
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: theoretical discussion
Dear,
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
I am subscribing for 4 homoeopathic lists. All in daily digests. I find time to read them after midnight. I read minimum 300 e-pages per day (including the skipping pages). I couldn’t clear the arrears. If we cooperate discussion can be brief and to point.
Let it be Virulent (powerful/potent) and not verbose (longwinded/ bombastic.)
Without offence to anybody my view.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Long back I read J.S. Mill on “Liberty”. He says that when you were encountered with a contradictory view, there would be three possibilities.
1. You might convince the other person with you view.
2. You might be convinced by the other view.
3. If not both, you would conform your view. Your conviction strengthened.
Sometime back in my absence, two of my colleagues were in heated discussion for more than an hour. One is theist and the other atheist. When I entered the room other friends requested me to mediate. I told them, as the arguments were on parallel lines and both persons were convinced in their views, there couldn’t be mediation or arbitration.
My suggestion as well as request. In the list when you are in theoretical discussion, you may be brief and specific. Regarding organon or chronic diseases, quote the relevant line or words, which you agree, differ or interpret differently. You may give the aphorism #. Then you may give your points.
I assume that we might have read organon at least once (!!), though not mastered it. We might be having a copy of anyone of the translation. If necessary we can refer it. More or less we are members in more lists. Similar inconclusive discussions were in the past and will be in future. The reason for inconclusive is given above.
I am subscribing for 4 homoeopathic lists. All in daily digests. I find time to read them after midnight. I read minimum 300 e-pages per day (including the skipping pages). I couldn’t clear the arrears. If we cooperate discussion can be brief and to point.
Let it be Virulent (powerful/potent) and not verbose (longwinded/ bombastic.)
Without offence to anybody my view.
BE HAPPY AND MAKE OTHERS HAPPY.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
PLEASE VISIT: http://www.freewebs.com/aumpranava/index.htm
---------------------------------
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]