Rochelle, I seem to remember a similar discussion before with an end
result of 50/50.
I have not treated anyone with implants but I have known awful stories
regarding the effect of Silicea. Potency and dose would probably be an
issue to prevent any attempt towards expulsion or leakage but in the
grander scale of things it is hard to imagine the silica 'type' wanting
breast implants. FWIW.
Best wishes, Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
re: breast implants and Silica
-
Fran Sheffield
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm
Re: re: breast implants and Silica
Hello all,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 7:13:36 PM, you wrote:
JL> Rochelle, I seem to remember a similar discussion before with an end
JL> result of 50/50.
JL> I have not treated anyone with implants but I have known awful stories
JL> regarding the effect of Silicea. Potency and dose would probably be an
JL> issue to prevent any attempt towards expulsion or leakage but in the
JL> grander scale of things it is hard to imagine the silica 'type' wanting
JL> breast implants. FWIW.
It can go either way. Implants of any type are perceived by the vital
force as a foreign body and can push the person into a Silica state -
the more sensitive they are the more easily it will happen. A person
who is already in a constitutional Silica state will also react more
readily to the foreign body when inserted.
I have not treated breast implants but have treated patients with
coronary artery stents and with other prosthetics and as long as I
have prescribed according to reaction and sensitivity have not had too
much of a problem. When treated carefully the body will not jeapardise
its own health. Those who would appear to have been pushed into a
Silica state by a foreign body deeply embedded within them seem to
move out of a Silica state with treatment allowing them to live with
the implant with less sensitivity. Have had superficial foreign bodies
such as splinters, amalgams, etc, fall out though.
Best regards,
Fran mailto:FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 7:13:36 PM, you wrote:
JL> Rochelle, I seem to remember a similar discussion before with an end
JL> result of 50/50.
JL> I have not treated anyone with implants but I have known awful stories
JL> regarding the effect of Silicea. Potency and dose would probably be an
JL> issue to prevent any attempt towards expulsion or leakage but in the
JL> grander scale of things it is hard to imagine the silica 'type' wanting
JL> breast implants. FWIW.
It can go either way. Implants of any type are perceived by the vital
force as a foreign body and can push the person into a Silica state -
the more sensitive they are the more easily it will happen. A person
who is already in a constitutional Silica state will also react more
readily to the foreign body when inserted.
I have not treated breast implants but have treated patients with
coronary artery stents and with other prosthetics and as long as I
have prescribed according to reaction and sensitivity have not had too
much of a problem. When treated carefully the body will not jeapardise
its own health. Those who would appear to have been pushed into a
Silica state by a foreign body deeply embedded within them seem to
move out of a Silica state with treatment allowing them to live with
the implant with less sensitivity. Have had superficial foreign bodies
such as splinters, amalgams, etc, fall out though.
Best regards,
Fran mailto:FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au