Does anyone else besides myself recieve this post EVERY time they post?
This is really frustrating! If this person doesn't want to be on the list,
why don't they unsubscribe? Also, why when I'm posting to a Yahoogroups
list, why is this coming at me from a Lyris List? I don't understand.
On CNN tonight
-
Soroush Ebrahimi
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: On CNN tonight
Mm, arguing "on theory", in absence of a full case, is always exciting,
LOL! Personally, I would think *in theory* that a single remedy might
have been sufficient (I don't think I'd bank on a single dose, but
that's only a guess)--IF...
But that's the sort of situation--dire emergency--when (again
personally) I might be open to "throwing a bunch against the wall, and
hoping that something sticks", er, I mean giving more than one at a
time, of course unless I felt pretty sure about a particular remedy.
(Normally I *never* combine remedies; but normally I am not treating
someone who's being threatened with imminent amputation!)
It sure would be nice to *know* just what was doing what! And once
healing was well underway, maybe it would have been feasible to
"experiment" and find out... If the patient was open to it, and once
the situation was out of the critical stage, of course.
Shannon
LOL! Personally, I would think *in theory* that a single remedy might
have been sufficient (I don't think I'd bank on a single dose, but
that's only a guess)--IF...
But that's the sort of situation--dire emergency--when (again
personally) I might be open to "throwing a bunch against the wall, and
hoping that something sticks", er, I mean giving more than one at a
time, of course unless I felt pretty sure about a particular remedy.
(Normally I *never* combine remedies; but normally I am not treating
someone who's being threatened with imminent amputation!)
It sure would be nice to *know* just what was doing what! And once
healing was well underway, maybe it would have been feasible to
"experiment" and find out... If the patient was open to it, and once
the situation was out of the critical stage, of course.
Shannon
-
Simon King LCPH MARH
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: On CNN tonight
I'm certainly not suggesting that any one should!
What interests me is that in the past I seem to remember that when not
too dissimilar prescribing strategies have been mooted there have been
responses, if not admonitions, that a single remedy should be the
better way, that a fuller case should be taken and so forth. I am
neither for nor agin these positions but am asking those that usually
do come down strongly on any thing not 'classical' to expound their
position in light of such a case.
Simon
see Health, Hope, Joy & Healing :
What interests me is that in the past I seem to remember that when not
too dissimilar prescribing strategies have been mooted there have been
responses, if not admonitions, that a single remedy should be the
better way, that a fuller case should be taken and so forth. I am
neither for nor agin these positions but am asking those that usually
do come down strongly on any thing not 'classical' to expound their
position in light of such a case.
Simon
see Health, Hope, Joy & Healing :
-
Simon King LCPH MARH
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:00 pm
-
Simon King LCPH MARH
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:00 pm
-
Simon King LCPH MARH
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:00 pm
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: On CNN tonight
Hi Simon,
I'm neither one of our experts nor one of our dogmatists, but here are
my thoughts:
In a case less critical than this, I think there are a number of
advantages to the "one remedy at a time" approach (tho I don't think
anyone would espouse "one dose" as a matter of principle; of course
that has to depend on the person's situation and response):
remedy on assumption that it will do "only so much", but you will find
that it does a great deal more--that sort of clinical experience has
added wonderful dimensions to some of our remedies, that we would not
have otherwise found out about. Thiosinamin comes to mind, but there
have been others too.
up not really doing much, even tho it seems like it "ought to" (I'm
sure we've all see that happen, hm?
)
remedies work.
But experience does seem to say that you *can* (generally speaking)
give a combination of remedies and have "the right one work, and the
others do nothing". This may not *always* be true, but seems generally
to be. So if you have an urgent case and are not *certain* of the
remedy needed, for whatever reason, IMO it could be a reasonable thing
to do--I would, at any rate. And as soon as I could--as soon as the
patient had sufficient recovery in place--I would work out *which*
remedy(s) had had the needed effect.
I'll be interested to hear others' thoughts!
Shannon
I'm neither one of our experts nor one of our dogmatists, but here are
my thoughts:
In a case less critical than this, I think there are a number of
advantages to the "one remedy at a time" approach (tho I don't think
anyone would espouse "one dose" as a matter of principle; of course
that has to depend on the person's situation and response):
remedy on assumption that it will do "only so much", but you will find
that it does a great deal more--that sort of clinical experience has
added wonderful dimensions to some of our remedies, that we would not
have otherwise found out about. Thiosinamin comes to mind, but there
have been others too.
up not really doing much, even tho it seems like it "ought to" (I'm
sure we've all see that happen, hm?
)remedies work.
But experience does seem to say that you *can* (generally speaking)
give a combination of remedies and have "the right one work, and the
others do nothing". This may not *always* be true, but seems generally
to be. So if you have an urgent case and are not *certain* of the
remedy needed, for whatever reason, IMO it could be a reasonable thing
to do--I would, at any rate. And as soon as I could--as soon as the
patient had sufficient recovery in place--I would work out *which*
remedy(s) had had the needed effect.
I'll be interested to hear others' thoughts!
Shannon
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
-
Atiq Ahmad Bhatti
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:22 pm
Re: On CNN tonight
Pyrogenium 200c combined with another remedy (one I am not willing to state)
in 200c is the Homeopathic anti biotic. I have used it on over 400 patients
and taken them off GP allopathic antibiotics and it ALWAYS works, mostly
within 3 days compared to a course for many antibiotics
_____
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Finrod
Sent: 23 June 2005 16:09
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Minutus] On CNN tonight
What is the difference in treatment between MRSA (staph) infection and any
other?
Do we not take the patient's symptoms and treat them accordingly?
Or are you saying that it can be regarded as an epidemic and for example
Pyrogen is selected based on the symptoms it has generated in many people?
Rgds
Soroush
in 200c is the Homeopathic anti biotic. I have used it on over 400 patients
and taken them off GP allopathic antibiotics and it ALWAYS works, mostly
within 3 days compared to a course for many antibiotics
_____
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Finrod
Sent: 23 June 2005 16:09
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Minutus] On CNN tonight
What is the difference in treatment between MRSA (staph) infection and any
other?
Do we not take the patient's symptoms and treat them accordingly?
Or are you saying that it can be regarded as an epidemic and for example
Pyrogen is selected based on the symptoms it has generated in many people?
Rgds
Soroush