Minerals / Elements?

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Hi

I am in favour all such learning.

However, I assume that we are going to stick to just elements.
But the compounds are just as interesting and it would be of interest if
colleagues volunteered on a rota basis to research one element and its
compounds, prepared a comparative chart (on WORD or EXCEL) which could be
sent to the interested group privately as an attachment.

Joy's input in such a scheme would be invaluable.

[Can those who are familiar with Scholten's work, advise how much of his
work is based on proving and how much of it is theoretical.]

Rgds
Soroush
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 06:38:24 -0000
From: "tjelie"
Subject: Re: Minerals
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, AH wrote:

I like the idea, but my vote would be to start
Hi Andy

Maybe that is a better idee, and then take only those who had a
descent proving.
Then Plutonium could be a good one to start with.

Annemieke
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Rosemary C Hyde PhD]

This is a nice idea, shaping up interestingly. I'd enjoy volunteering to research a part. Rosemary

[tjelie]

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:
Hi Soroush

Well, I think it is not necessesary to stick to just elements.
A lot of remedy's are only proved as a compound, and that will do.
My proposal would be to just get started and see what happens.
So maybe we can start with Plutonium Nitricum (I think that is the
only Plutonium that had a proving) and call this week officially
Plutoniumweek
Then next Sunday we could start with the next remedy: Neptunium.

So has anyone experience with Plutonium Nitricum or knows if there
are some other Plutonium compounds that are proved.

Look forward to any information.
Annemieke