Sim....II?

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Editor-in-Chief; Homoeopathic Medical Panorama
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:33 pm

Re: Sim....II?

Post by Editor-in-Chief; Homoeopathic Medical Panorama »

So..
Joy,
You are also invited to join the discussion of 'what do you think about
applying the theory to tailor making individual remedies for cases otherwise
not responding to Rx. I hope you do not object in curing more patients who
are outside the purview of homoeopathy now.
Also with due respect, let me strongly disagree with your statement of
liking H as the way it is today. In my opinion exploring/expanding/advancing
is never a sin but the need of any system. Also ultimately one has to
discover what is homoeopathy. And I think it will be a lot more better if we
do it ourselves than any physicist or biologist. Because I am sure we can do
it if we use our brain power.
Best Regards,
Dr. Abdul Gafar.
www.homeoweb.com/clinic/uae.htm
www.homedpa.com/chief.htm
Tel: +971 50 4699659 (mobile-UAE)
+91 944 7244662 (mobile-India)
(Presently in UAE)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely, science will catch up with Homoeopathy!
---------------------------------------------------------------


J Lucas
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Sim....II?

Post by J Lucas »

Dr Gafar, cases not responding to the rx = remedy not correct, potency
and/or dose not correct. For me it is that simple.

It is difficult to judge anything new, we are still waiting for the data to
come in on this. What does this have to do with not wanting to cure people.

*** Also for Cinnabar ­ I am not criticising Dr R. He doesn¹t speak as much
about the organ/disease specific rx he uses but more about the repeat dose
plussing method which he says is the main reason he has so much success with
cancer cases. This is a more than subtle difference. He uses multiple rx, as
you know, but we still don¹t know what is doing what. Nosodes are prominent
in his work and I think this is a significant factor.

Joy
on 9/2/05 6:39 am, Editor-in-Chief; Homoeopathic Medical Panorama at
chief@homedpa.com wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Rochelle Marsden
Posts: 2005
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:00 pm

Re: Sim....II?

Post by Rochelle Marsden »



I attended his Post Grad course over 6 weekends I think it was where all he did was speak about the organ/disease specific Rx he uses!! The Cancer Seminar was something different. He only uses plussing in cancer. His standard posology other than that is 200C 4 x a day repeated fortnightly. In an acute situation he will give 6- 10 doses a day for a couple of days and again often in the 200 potency but in a water potency rather than a dry dose. BTW I still prescribe by looking for the constitutional Rx needed at that moment (except in acutes)!!

Rochelle

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


J Lucas
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Sim....II?

Post by J Lucas »

I was actually referring to his approach to cancer ­ should have been
clearer on this.

Joy

on 9/2/05 3:24 pm, Rochelle Marsden at rochelle@ntlworld.com wrote:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”