potency

[isali ben-jacob]

You will likely require an inventory as the potency should match the picture and the pt. vital force to respond.

pegmee@aol.com wrote:

[Joy Lucas]

Soroush, I respect that your post was to Lisa but... you cannot theorise
about this, it all depends on the individual case and yes, to correspond to
the level of disease, (as Lisa says) that is all you need to decide.
Regards, Joy
Joy

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

[Lisa Barrett]

Dear Soroush,

you wrote:

<

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

I was not asking for theorising?

I was asking for results of experiments (although uncontrolled).

Soroush

[Lisa Barrett]

Dear Charlotte,

you wrote:

Divya Chhabra has done proving of several remedies in potencies 30c, 200c,
lM, 10M
and 50M.

Lots of people over the years have tried to demystify potency, and I read
Divya article with interest but cannot wholly agree with her.

She cites examples of someone having a fear of dogs at 30c not being so
intense, meaning that the person can express the fear and still live a
normal life. She goes on to say that the person who needs lM finds it
difficult to cope with the fear, and to continue normal life, because their
delusion or fear of dogs is ever-present and they will see a dog from miles
away. This theory goes back to the belief that the higher the potency the
deeper the state or disease, e.g. a delusion that one is criticised at 30c
would be that they think they are criticised but actually realise that it
may not be a reality but something to do with their sensitivity. At 1M they
believe comments directed towards them are definate criticisms and cannot be
persuaded otherwise.

When I read this what immediately sprang to mind was a friend of mine who's
fear of dogs was so intense she would cross the road if she saw one coming
from a long way away. One day one came in her back gate and she fainted. I
gave her one Stram 30 on that and other symptoms and she now owns two dogs
of her own. According to this theory she needed lM but 30c cured.

I have also found on experimentation of potency over the last few years that
6c and 30c
are very effective potencies and cure many case without having to ascend to
lM and further. I did not find the same to be true when I used mainly high
potencies.

I think further work on potency is great but I suspect we will never fit it
in to tight compartments.

regards
Lisa Barrett

[Willy]

Hello to all,

I read in different kind of sources (P. Guyt, de Schepper etc) that
for example C200 is prescribed in acute diseases, while I was told
to use a low(er) potency. Also I read that in chronic cases you give
a low potency.

This confuses me, can anybody explain?
Gr Willy

[Shannon Nelson]

Hi Willy,

Either high or low potency can be used in either acute or chronic case.
The choice would depend partly on the particulars of the case (there
are situations where high potency may be more effective, and other
situations where high potency should not be used at all), and partly on
the training and experience of the prescriber (sometimes our choices
are simply based on our experience, not meaning that it's the only way
to do it!), and perhaps also on preference of the patient (each potency
range has its advantages and disadvantages...).

High potencies (above 30c) should be used only by prescribers with very
full training--to know when high potency is (or is not) appropriate,
what to expect, what to do if the unexpected happens, etc., etc., etc.

Low potencies (6-12?) are best for learning with, as they are very
"user friendly" yet extremely effective when well chosen.

It's a big topic, but does that help at all?
Shannon

[Farbod RAHNAMAI CHITSAZ]

Dear Willy

The dose and potency only depends on the
susceptibility of your patient. In acute cases the
susceptibility is higher, then its better to use
weaker artificial disease, means lower potencies if
you use Dry dose, If you use solution remedies its
also better to use low potencies. But my experience
is, low potency and high dose works better than low
potency and low dose.

Regards
Farbod
--- Willy wrote:

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Rosemary C Hyde, Ph.D.]

Can it be cured?

Since Type I diabetes, which is apparently what this person has, results from destruction of the pancreatic tissue, it's been my understanding that it is not amenable to cure by homeopathy, although certainly homeopathic treatment can help to forestall many of the terrible complications of this disease.

Rosemary
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Shannon Nelson]

But, I was taught that in an acute disease with a strong, quick pacing
and strong, clear symptom picture, high potency is needed to match the
energy of the disease. And I have numerous times seen this approach
work very well. Wouldn't this also be a situation of "higher
susceptibility", or do I misunderstand that part?

In strong illness and severe injury, I have seen 30c repeatedly work
less well (not so completely and not so lastingly) than 200c or 1M. I
have not tried using e.g. 6c and e.g. 1M on the same injury or illness;
maybe at some point I will be able to compare that directly.

It seems that this is another area where there are numerous
possibilities...??

Best,
Shannon