In the interview with dr. Hamer there were a number of pretty strong
statements. Maybe some people on this list would like to comment.
- A pregnancy beyond 3 months has precedence over most, if not all, other
health issues, including the development or growth of cancer.
- No form of cancer will develop in tissues or organs that are disconnected
from the brain.
- In those recovering from cancer you will see some form of epileptic
complaints and/or edema in the brain.
- A woman taking the pill will react biologically to conflict shocks the
same way a man would, and so can have masculine conflicts.
Hennie
a bit more Hamer
Re: a bit more Hamer
Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 4:14:33 PM, Hennie wrote:
Hi Hennie,
Read the same thing and wondered about a few of his statements myself,
cancer has my interest because we had several of those in my close
relatives, i can believe that troublesome thoughts can cause cancer in
the long run, but the way dr Hamer explains it... dont know.
What do you think? can you stand behind his overall viewpoint?
Marleen
Hi Hennie,
Read the same thing and wondered about a few of his statements myself,
cancer has my interest because we had several of those in my close
relatives, i can believe that troublesome thoughts can cause cancer in
the long run, but the way dr Hamer explains it... dont know.
What do you think? can you stand behind his overall viewpoint?
Marleen
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: a bit more Hamer
Well...
on 8/25/04 12:22 PM, Marleen at marleen.scheers@pandora.be wrote:
"Takes precedence" in what sense? Does he mean that, after 3 months
gestation, the baby's survival is more important than the mother's? Or does
he mean progression of cancer will be suspended while the pregnancy
develops? (I believe that second to not be the case...)
??? Are the breasts connected to the brain? If so, then what tissues could
be said *not* to be? No comprendo...
Shannon
on 8/25/04 12:22 PM, Marleen at marleen.scheers@pandora.be wrote:
"Takes precedence" in what sense? Does he mean that, after 3 months
gestation, the baby's survival is more important than the mother's? Or does
he mean progression of cancer will be suspended while the pregnancy
develops? (I believe that second to not be the case...)
??? Are the breasts connected to the brain? If so, then what tissues could
be said *not* to be? No comprendo...
Shannon
-
Nancy Siciliana
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 10:00 pm
Re: a bit more Hamer
I find a lot of this to be very interesting, especially the epileptic/edema
complaints in patients recovering from cancer...
but, what, exactly, would be the definition of "masculine conflicts"?
I'm really, really curious here...I have lots of patients on the BCP, and
their conflicts aren't particularly "masculine" in any way I can see. I
hope I'm not missing anything.
regards,
Nancy
_________________________________________________________________
Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen
Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&pag ... S_Taglines
Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
first two months FREE*.
complaints in patients recovering from cancer...
but, what, exactly, would be the definition of "masculine conflicts"?
I'm really, really curious here...I have lots of patients on the BCP, and
their conflicts aren't particularly "masculine" in any way I can see. I
hope I'm not missing anything.
regards,
Nancy
_________________________________________________________________
Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen
Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&pag ... S_Taglines
Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
first two months FREE*.
-
Hennie Duits
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: a bit more Hamer
I don't know what to think of these statements, but I am sure there must be
people who are able to confirm or deny them. Does cancer *never* develop in
the last six months of pregnancy? Is it possible to induce cancer in an
isolated organ in an artificial circulation, in a cell culture, or even: has
there ever been anybody who developed cancer after getting into coma? Are
epileptic complaints and/or edema in the brain a rule when recovering from
cancer? I dont't know, but there must be those who do.
If his statements are true, it raises Hamers credibility, I think.
Hennie
people who are able to confirm or deny them. Does cancer *never* develop in
the last six months of pregnancy? Is it possible to induce cancer in an
isolated organ in an artificial circulation, in a cell culture, or even: has
there ever been anybody who developed cancer after getting into coma? Are
epileptic complaints and/or edema in the brain a rule when recovering from
cancer? I dont't know, but there must be those who do.
If his statements are true, it raises Hamers credibility, I think.
Hennie
-
Hennie Duits
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: a bit more Hamer
I could explain (I think..) 'masculine conflicts', but I'm sure it would be
'cleaner' to read what is said in the interview.
(http://www.neue-medizin.com/interv2a.htm ). The subject is in part 2 of the
interview.
HIH,
Hennie
epileptic/edema
'cleaner' to read what is said in the interview.
(http://www.neue-medizin.com/interv2a.htm ). The subject is in part 2 of the
interview.
HIH,
Hennie
epileptic/edema

