Case BST/Nov.01

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Trying to analyse someone else's case is a difficult task - because the information is second hand.

My first and immediate reaction to reading this case was that I was not sure whether the centre of the case has been identified.
It seems that we only have part of the picture.

There seems to be a lot of history in this case and my feeling is that we need to take this history gently apart to see what is really there.

We have a history of abuse / Criticism, too much responsibility over long period, loads of fears etc.
Each of these issues need to be explained and opened in greater detail. How did they take place and what was the pt's reactions to them. How did the pt react to them?

Then we have a single word 'Positive.
How and why and when and to wards what?

And then we have a whole para later on 'feelings of despair' being expressed!

What is the relationship between the two? Are they mood swings?

"Very intuitive" Evidence? How?

"Sometimes feeling of cold air in nose". All the time or during inhalation or exhalation?

My recommendation would be that certain ground rules ought to be observed for the cases to be presented to the group.
In this presentation all sorts of information are presented without any editing or arrangement of symptoms.

I think it is essential to have the age and sex of the patient.

In a case such as this, where some remedies have been prescribed we need to know on what basis and what was the exact reaction to each remedy.

Only then do I think it would be fair to ask us to have a go.

Nonetheless, I think these cases are a brilliant idea and will have my full support.

Rgds & good luck
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]