More constructive arguments?

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Dear Colleagues

Pls let me quote from the Organon Aph 3 where Hahnemann explains the tools
of the Art and Science of Homoeopathy, first he said "if the physician he
clearly perceives what is to be cured in diseases" and then
"if he (the Physician) CLEARLY PERCEIVES what is curative in medicines, that
is to say, in each individual medicine (knowledge of medical powers)"

The second point is about the proving of the remedies.

He has given instructions as how materials should be proved and we deviate
from this to the peril of homoeopathy.
If the source and method of proving become unreliable, then it is not worth
inclusion in our MM.

People who propose dream or meditative proving need to PROVE that they can
comprehensively cover all M/E and Physical symptoms which may be obtainable
from the proving carried out as per Hn's instructions and that they CLEARLY
PERCEIVE what is curative in the remedy that they have dream proved.

Else the whole theoretical or pipe-dream mumbo-jumbo should be discarded.

Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]