Why classical homeopathy is full of hatered?

[Nanga Pir]

Dr. Margery Blackie was the first homopath who introduced this term and published a book name "CLASSICAL HOMOEOPATHY". Blackie used to send patients to allopathic surgeons and not only used mixed remedies but also simultaneously used allopathic and homopathic remedies. For example in pneumonia she prescribed penicillin and lachesis both at the same time. It shows what is classical anyway? Sure!

All this rhetoric against everybody else is similar to puritonical religious cult. Some people go for surgery yet they scold it. That is not much of a deal. But, in fact historically so called classical homopathy has been racist and discriminatory. Look how Nux Vom is for black and Pulsatilla is is for blue eye blonde people. Sepia is brunette. I have read almost all the famous authors in homeopathy and found that it carried this tendency consistently. One guy wrote a book about heart diseases and called Russians and native Americans as "primitive people". Hering thinks people who do not drink, like Muslims, are idiot. Pierce in his materia medica under Nux Vomica describes bad odor from patient. He says the odorin a Nux Vomica is similar to a home that have been recently been vacated by Black family. In one book, not related to homopathy, (Mismeasure of Man) Ira Gould writes that Hindus' brains are smaller than average. Do we have to base our medicine on such concepts? If the very
fundametnal theories of a medicine is hurting humenity how will it heal them or at least how it can claim to heal them? Blackie suggests that Hahnemann outrage against other medical professions was because he was driven out from one town where he was practicing. While traveling his cart had an accident and his family members were injured so he grew very angry and kept this anger for whole life.
Nanga Pir
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Allen Coniglio]

Once again you amaze me with your blind hatred and just plain meanness. You
are illogical and obviously looking for someone to hate. Look for the good
and you will find it. Look for the evil and you will find it. Grow up.

AC

[Shannon Nelson]

Q: "If a wise man and a fool have a discussion, who learns more?"
A: The wise man of course; if the fool were one for learning from the wise,
he wouldn't be a fool.

If we can only learn from "perfect people", people without any sins or
foolishness or error, well... Since I've yet to meet anyone like that, i
guess I'd have not even learned to talk yet! (Some would call that an
improvement, LOL!)

But did you have a point here?
Shannon
on 4/16/04 1:32 PM, allen coniglio at anon058@adelphia.net wrote:

[Julian Winston]

At 2:32 PM -0400 4/14/04, Nanga wrote:
Sorry to say, you are mistaken on a few counts. The book itself is
titled "Classical Homeopathy." It was published in 1986 by
Beaconsfield Press. It was Edited by, I believe, by Drs. Elliott and
Bodman. It was issued posthumously. The title was NOT Blackie's but
one chosen by the publisher. A careful perusal of of the first
section of the book will uncover no use of the term "classical" by
Blackie.
The term "Classical Homeopathy" was coined by Bill Gray and George
Vithoulkas in about 1978 to describe the practice of homeopathy that
relied on Kentian/Hahnemannian principles in contrast to that of a
simple "this for that" Therapeutic approach or the use of
polypharmacy.
These examples are taken out of the context in which they were
written. Hering died in 1880. Pierce lectured in 1900, Kent did the
same.
Times were different. We don't often come across concepts like these
because most books we read are newer texts. Only in Homeopathy are
the old works read because most of the information is as useable now
as it was then. So only homeopathy see these old references to sex,
race, and religion.
The attitudes expressed were those of 100 years ago. There is no
reason to get offended at them now.
As for Pulsatilla being for blue eyed blonde people-- you obviously
haven't read the lecture where Kent says that since Pulsatilla has
never, in a proving, turned a brunette into a blonde, or in clinical
work has never done the reverse, that using that to prescribe upon is
folly. BUT... in HIS experience (and this is in 1900 USA) a good
number of blonds respond to Pulsatilla. That was the genotype he was
seeing.
I remember at my first homeopathic training, we had a doc from India
in the class. After talking about Pulsatilla, Dr. Williams asked the
gentleman, "So, how often do you prescribe Pulsatilla for blondes in
India?" The doc laughed, and said, "For blondes? I never see them.
But for others, I prescribe a lot of Pulsatilla!"
That is Blackie's interpretation. Read Haehl. Hahnemann had a great
hatred of the medical profession long before he was driven out of
town.
Always go back to the source material
Blackie's comments are her interpretation, and come down third hand.

JW

[Allen Coniglio]

My point is exactly as stated.

Allen

[VBLUES]

In einer eMail vom 16.04.04 08:52:37 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt
nangapir@yahoo.com:

>
13.5.4.
The things you've written just MUST be answered.
Homeopathic and allopathic medicine can be used simultaneously because they
have different attack points:allopathic medicine works on the chemical level
while the homeopathic ones on the energetical, which is deeper and differently
structured. The point is if it does really make sens from the strategical point
of view, but there is no contraindication as a matter of principle.
There is no racism in homeopathy - every example you brought has NOTHING to
do with that. Racism is something completely different. It would be racist, if
anyone would refuse to treat a patient because he is black or whatever. No
doctor in the world will do such a thing! Human beings are very different, some
have dark eyes, some blue, etc., so what?
Nux vomica stinks, even terrible, from the mouth, due to dyspeptic phenomena
in the stomach.
Hahnemann had a coach-accident and one of his children even died on that
occasion. He hated the other doctors because he understood, being very
far-sighted, that they were doing many mistakes and nonsense and that they were not
willing to learn or hear or open for something new.
Classical homeopathy does NOT operate with complex remedies and works and is
practiced after a precise plan. "Other" homeopathies are rubbish and unproven,
subject of speculation and money-making.
I do not know who you actually are or what your level of knowledge is, but
I'd friendly suggest you defer in the future from this kind of remarks and give
it a second thought BEFORE you put such thing on-line.
Otherwise, kind regards, Dr. medic Viorel V. Bucur.