ROH and misconceptions

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Feras Hakkak
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2001 10:00 pm

ROH and misconceptions

Post by Feras Hakkak »

Hello,
Following my previous email, where I said that many of us have misconceptions about the masters of our art, I would like to present the answer Dr Yogesh Sehgal has given to me. I asked him why they use only "mental symptoms" and he said they use "mental state" to prescribe..... From my correspondences with Dr Yogesh I understood that what I had gathered from their books was incomplete and faulty.
Dr Yogesh Sehgal (the son of the late master Dr M.L.Sehgal) wrote to me:
"We don't prescribe on mental symptoms. We base our prescription only on Mental state. We don't say that physicals have no value , they have but if you are taking them with mind symptoms. You can add a few symptoms of mind + physicals like thermal + taste+ miasm and thus get the totality. But if I reach to the mental state E.g a patient who feels that it is useless to take the medicine for a small problem like cough which according to him is not a matter of concern , is not a disease state for which medicine has to be taken and he is coming to you because his family feels that he must take the medicine. It shows the Present Mental state of a patient during his problem. His attitude towards his problem. What it reflects the whole man. An individual. How he is taking his problem.? He is not trying to understand the importance of taking the medicine as according to him it is not a dieseas, he is not sick, it is only a simple cough. He is coming to you because family members are
putting pressure on him to escape from that pressure he feels it is better to take the medicine. It is to please other that he has come to you for the medicine. On his own he would not have come. He is persued by other, pushed by others.DELUSIONS, well he is
FRIVOLOUS : He feels what is the need to take medicine for such a small problem. He is floating on the surface with his attitude. Not thinking deep about the consequences of having a cough for which others are so serious but he is not.
WELL, says he is when , very sick : when all people around him are taking his problem so seriously and pushing him to visit the dr. he is still satisfy and does not feel he is sick. Well is a state of satisfaction.
Here I am trying to focus on an individual deep into his psyche, feel him what he is."
With best wishes,
Feras Hakkak
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


APEX PRECITECH
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:00 pm

Re: ROH and misconceptions

Post by APEX PRECITECH »

Dear Feras Hakkak,
Nice to see someone write on Dr Sehgal.
I myself contributed one or two postings in our group
the notable one being my reply to Rochell whose
patient had a desire to climb.

Dr Yogesh sehgal has given the term 'state' which was
eluding me all the time. What a term? People who have
read Dr Sehgal's works would be awestruck at the
simplicity of his work and the fact that he brought
another prescription method within the law of similars
yet distinct from contemporary thought.

I myself had a few good experiences with his method,
and when in a case nothing physical is visible, I lean
back and simply observe the talking computer- the
patient. The rubrics with verbs ending in 'ing' - the
present and present continuous tense- which were Dr
Sehgal's favourites were of great help.
I cured my sister's uterus prolapse when during an
unrelated fever this following state was noticed
Conscientious, trifles about( she felt guilty of my
wife doing all the work in the kitchen)
Irritability , pain during ( she was talking
irritably)
Ignatia was given which produced great perspiration in
15 minutes and everything were relieved. The prolapse
did not recur.

I would like to see more on this from members.
Best
venkat
--- Feras Hakkak wrote:
---------------------------------
Hello,
Following my previous email, where I said that many of
us have misconceptions about the masters of our art, I
would like to present the answer Dr Yogesh Sehgal has
given to me. I asked him why they use only "mental
symptoms" and he said they use "mental state" to
prescribe..... From my correspondences with Dr Yogesh
I understood that what I had gathered from their books
was incomplete and faulty.
Dr Yogesh Sehgal (the son of the late master Dr
M.L.Sehgal) wrote to me:
"We don't prescribe on mental symptoms. We base our
prescription only on Mental state. We don't say that
physicals have no value , they have but if you are
taking them with mind symptoms. You can add a few
symptoms of mind + physicals like thermal + taste+
miasm and thus get the totality. But if I reach to the
mental state E.g a patient who feels that it is
useless to take the medicine for a small problem like
cough which according to him is not a matter of
concern , is not a disease state for which medicine
has to be taken and he is coming to you because his
family feels that he must take the medicine. It shows
the Present Mental state of a patient during his
problem. His attitude towards his problem. What it
reflects the whole man. An individual. How he is
taking his problem.? He is not trying to understand
the importance of taking the medicine as according to
him it is not a dieseas, he is not sick, it is only a
simple cough. He is coming to you because family
members are
putting pressure on him to escape from that pressure
he feels it is better to take the medicine. It is to
please other that he has come to you for the medicine.
On his own he would not have come. He is persued by
other, pushed by others.DELUSIONS, well he is
FRIVOLOUS : He feels what is the need to take
medicine for such a small problem. He is floating on
the surface with his attitude. Not thinking deep about
the consequences of having a cough for which others
are so serious but he is not.
WELL, says he is when , very sick : when all people
around him are taking his problem so seriously and
pushing him to visit the dr. he is still satisfy and
does not feel he is sick. Well is a state of
satisfaction.
Here I am trying to focus on an individual deep into
his psyche, feel him what he is."
With best wishes,
Feras Hakkak
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
ATTENTION PLEASE:

The Minutus Group is established purely for the
promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of
its members. It makes no representations regarding the
individual suitability of the information contained in
any document read or advice or recommendation offered
which appears on this website and/or email postings
for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their
use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the
minutus site or its individual members be liable for
any direct, consequential, incidental, special,
punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.

****
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send
a message with the subject of 'Digest' to
ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner online.
Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com


Albert
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:22 pm

Re: ROH and misconceptions

Post by Albert »

"J.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN" wrote: People who have read Dr Sehgal's
works would be [1.] awestruck at the simplicity of his work and the
fact that he brought another prescription method within the law of
similars
yet distinct from contemporary thought."

And what's wrong with Hahnemann's method?

---------

1. Would be? I thought you're referring to people who have already
read it. Are you talking about people with two heads, who thus have
to change them to fully comprehend something? Seems da be sum of dem
kinds 'round here, pardner; know what I mean?


Albert
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 4:22 pm

Re: ROH and misconceptions

Post by Albert »

Feras Hakkak wrote: "I asked him [Dr. Yogesh] why they [the master
prescribers] use only 'mental symptoms.'"

That's a lie, and only somebody without the slightest clue about how
to do homeotherapeutics ever makes such assinine remarks.


Feras Hakkak
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2001 10:00 pm

Re: ROH and misconceptions

Post by Feras Hakkak »

The words in the brackets are yours not mine. "They" means "the ROH homoeopaths". ROH is revolutionized homoeopathy founded by Dr L.M.Sehgal.

Albert wrote:Feras Hakkak wrote: "I asked him [Dr. Yogesh] why they [the master
prescribers] use only 'mental symptoms.'"

That's a lie, and only somebody without the slightest clue about how to do homeotherapeutics ever makes such assinine remarks.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”