hi anita,
i am Dr. priyanka from mumbai.
Hello
-
ANITA SALUNKHE
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Hello
Hi! priyanka from were??/
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
-
Hans Radax
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
-
HomeoDidact
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:00 pm
-
hannahfroukje
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
-
Eric Leventhal Arthen
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Hello
Dear List,
I am not a homoeopathic doctor but have tried to study the science
since 1977, that makes it 27 years. I do not practice. From the
perspective of a patient what I have found is that homoeopathy as it
is practised by most qualified homoeopaths is a wee bit different
from what is prescribed in the Organon and other classical texts.
The homoeopathy courses offered by various colleges and universities
too seem to be more interested in giving its students a "modern"
perspective of disease rather than making them aware of classical
homoeopathy. As a result most of the students who pass out are a
confused lot.
I believe that the most important part of homoeopathy is the case
taking. But very few doctors maintain records. The most common
explanation given is that patients are wary of intense questioning.
Well, if homoeopathy has to stand out and make itself felt then
these anomalies have to be rectified. The patients do not mind if
the allopaths subject them to a retinue of costly clinical tests, so
is it so difficult for them to answer a few questions?
My grievances are not merely intellectual. As a chronic patient I
had to suffer from the whims and fancies of many a so called
homoeopath for about 25 years before I found the good soul who
treats me now. I doubt if every patient will have that kind of faith
and patience. They would rather conclude that homoeopathy is a pain
in the neck.
Regards,
Jagannath.
I am not a homoeopathic doctor but have tried to study the science
since 1977, that makes it 27 years. I do not practice. From the
perspective of a patient what I have found is that homoeopathy as it
is practised by most qualified homoeopaths is a wee bit different
from what is prescribed in the Organon and other classical texts.
The homoeopathy courses offered by various colleges and universities
too seem to be more interested in giving its students a "modern"
perspective of disease rather than making them aware of classical
homoeopathy. As a result most of the students who pass out are a
confused lot.
I believe that the most important part of homoeopathy is the case
taking. But very few doctors maintain records. The most common
explanation given is that patients are wary of intense questioning.
Well, if homoeopathy has to stand out and make itself felt then
these anomalies have to be rectified. The patients do not mind if
the allopaths subject them to a retinue of costly clinical tests, so
is it so difficult for them to answer a few questions?
My grievances are not merely intellectual. As a chronic patient I
had to suffer from the whims and fancies of many a so called
homoeopath for about 25 years before I found the good soul who
treats me now. I doubt if every patient will have that kind of faith
and patience. They would rather conclude that homoeopathy is a pain
in the neck.
Regards,
Jagannath.