Hello,
In the previous post I wrote about allopathy. Now I would like to add two points:
1- Allopathy or the modern western medicine may save lives in emergency cases. At least the patients do not die, although suppression may take place.
2- Many homoeopaths in the world are allopaths but they do not recognize it !! Prescribing potentized remedies doesn't make a physician a homoeopath. Giving specifics, repeating frequently, combining remedies, etc is simply allopathy not homoeopathy. So what I wrote about allopathy (suppressions ...) is applicable to this kind of the so-called homoeopathic practice. NOT ALL THAT GLITTERS IS GOLD!
Sincerely,
Feras Hakkak
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Allopathy and homoeopathy
-
Farbod Rahnamai
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Allopathy and homoeopathy
Dear Feras
As a theoretical argument:
Allopathy is different from orthodox medicine. As you said above many
homeopaths in the world do allopathy by the remedies which are obtained
from homeopathic farmacy. Do not forget that in some cases of modern
medicine they do homeopathy, although they are using a drug which is
chemical. I believe they use anthipathy, allopathy and in some cases
homeopathy. So that is not right to call modern western medicine,
allopathy. Because it is a mixture of Antipathy, Allopathy and
Homeopathy. What is your idea?
Best
Farbod
As a theoretical argument:
Allopathy is different from orthodox medicine. As you said above many
homeopaths in the world do allopathy by the remedies which are obtained
from homeopathic farmacy. Do not forget that in some cases of modern
medicine they do homeopathy, although they are using a drug which is
chemical. I believe they use anthipathy, allopathy and in some cases
homeopathy. So that is not right to call modern western medicine,
allopathy. Because it is a mixture of Antipathy, Allopathy and
Homeopathy. What is your idea?
Best
Farbod
-
Feras Hakkak
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2001 10:00 pm
Re: Allopathy and homoeopathy
Hello Farbod,
?
Yes, you are absolutely right. Allopathy means use of
a remedy with no antipathic or homoeopathic
relationship to the disease. But it has another
meaning which is commonly used (although wrong), i.e.
the modern western medicine.
?
I know that sometimes they prescribe a remedy
homoeopathically, but it is rare. Please keep in mind
that the remedy must be homoeopathic to the whole
patient not some of his disease symptoms. For example,
they use digitalis for heart problems. It may be
homoeopathic to the heart symptoms, but usually it is
not homoeopathic to the totality of symptoms. This
is?why?I do not call the specific-prescribers,
homoeopaths. Their work leads to suppressions.
?
Thanks for the reminding,
?
Feras Hakkak
-----------------------------------------------------
Farbod Rahnamai wrote:
Dear Feras
As a theoretical argument:
Allopathy is different from orthodox medicine. As you
said above many homeopaths in the world do allopathy
by the remedies which are obtained from homeopathic
farmacy. Do not forget that in some cases of modern
medicine they do homeopathy, although they are using a
drug which is chemical. I believe they use anthipathy,
allopathy and in some cases homeopathy. So that is not
right to call modern western medicine,
allopathy. Because it is a mixture of Antipathy,
Allopathy and Homeopathy. What is your idea?
Best
Farbod
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
?
Yes, you are absolutely right. Allopathy means use of
a remedy with no antipathic or homoeopathic
relationship to the disease. But it has another
meaning which is commonly used (although wrong), i.e.
the modern western medicine.
?
I know that sometimes they prescribe a remedy
homoeopathically, but it is rare. Please keep in mind
that the remedy must be homoeopathic to the whole
patient not some of his disease symptoms. For example,
they use digitalis for heart problems. It may be
homoeopathic to the heart symptoms, but usually it is
not homoeopathic to the totality of symptoms. This
is?why?I do not call the specific-prescribers,
homoeopaths. Their work leads to suppressions.
?
Thanks for the reminding,
?
Feras Hakkak
-----------------------------------------------------
Farbod Rahnamai wrote:
Dear Feras
As a theoretical argument:
Allopathy is different from orthodox medicine. As you
said above many homeopaths in the world do allopathy
by the remedies which are obtained from homeopathic
farmacy. Do not forget that in some cases of modern
medicine they do homeopathy, although they are using a
drug which is chemical. I believe they use anthipathy,
allopathy and in some cases homeopathy. So that is not
right to call modern western medicine,
allopathy. Because it is a mixture of Antipathy,
Allopathy and Homeopathy. What is your idea?
Best
Farbod
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

